Analisis ‘Illah Hukum Terhadap Hadis Perubatan Nabawī Berkaitan Habbatussauda, Madu, Susu Berserta Air Kencing Unta
Prophetic Medicine on the Usage of the Black Seed, Honey, Milk, and Camel’s Urine: An Analysis of its ‘Illah
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33102/johs.v7i1.168Keywords:
Prophetic medicine, ‘illah, black seed, honey, camel’s urine and milk.Abstract
Prophetic medicine is one of the parts of Islamic Shariah law as it is mentioned in the hadiths of the Prophet which is one of the sources of Islamic jurisprudence. To avoid any misunderstanding and exploitation in society, these hadiths need to be understood precisely through the method of ‘illah analysis contained in these hadiths. The ‘illah debate has been explained in detail by past and contemporary scholars from both theoretical and practical points of view. Thus, through qualitative methods, the researchers refer to the main sources of fiqh, uṣūl fiqh and prophetic medicine to discuss the debate of 'illah and Prophetic medicine in more depth while utilizing current scholarly writings, articles, newspapers, magazines and websites that touching on the topic of study. Overall, based on research on the hadiths related to the black seed, honey, and camel’s urine and milk, the researchers found that the hadiths about Prophetic medicines are not all absolutely general in nature and mean obligatory orders because there are certain qarinah that deny them. Therefore, it is inappropriate if these hadiths are practiced according to their understanding that is only taken outwardly without taking into account factors such as the position of the hadith, its context, and interpretation.
Downloads
References
‘Umar Qāsim Hajj Muhammad. (2015). At-Tibb an-Nabawi wa Qawaid at-Ta’amul ma’a al-Ahādith fi al-Masā’il at-Ṭibbiah. Jurnal at-Tajdid, jidil 14, bil.38.
Abū Daud, Sulaymān al-Ash‘ath. (2009). Tahqiq: Abū Ṭāhir Zubair bin Ali Zay’. Sunan Abū Daud. Dar as-Salām lil Nasyr wa at-Tauzī’.
Al-‘Uthaimin, Muhammad ibn Salih. Al-Ta‘liqat ‘Ala al-Kafi li Ibn Qudamah. t.t. t.p.
Al-Āmidī, `Alī bin Muḥammad. (1402H). Al-Iḥkām fī Uṣūl al-Aḥkām. Al-Maktab al-Islāmī.
Al-Aṣfahānī, Abū Nu‘aym. (2006). Mausū‘ah al-Ṭibb al-Nabawī. Dar Ibn Hazm.
Al-Bazdawi, ‘Ali ibn Muhammad. (2014). Kanz al-Wusul ila Ma‘rifat al-Usul. Dar al- Sirāj.
Al-Bukhārī, Muhammad ibn Ismā‘il. (1999). Ṣahīh al-Bukhārī. Dar as-Salam lil Nasyr wa at-Tawzi‘.
Al-Ghasani, Al-Malik al-Muzaffar. (1982). Al-Mu‘tamad fi al-Adawiah al-Mufradah. t.t. Dar al-Ma‘rifah.
Al-Ghazālī, Muḥammad ibn Muḥammad. (t.t). Al-Muṣtaṣfā min `Ilm al-Uṣūl. Dār al-Maimān li al-Nasyr wa al-Tauzī`.
Al-Haitamī, Aḥmad ibn Muhammad ibn ‘Alī ibn Ḥajar. (1983). Tuhfat al-Muḥtāj. t.t. Maktabah al-Tijariah al-Kubra.
Al-Khaṭṭābī, Ḥammād ibn Muhammad bin Ibrahim. (1932). Ma’ālim fi al-Sunan. Al- Matba’ah al-Ilmiah.
Al-Mubārakfūri, Muhammad Abd al-Raḥmān ibn Abd al-Rahīm. (t.t). Tuḥfat al- Aḥwāzī sharh Sunan al-Tirmidhī. Dar al-Kutub al-‘ilmiah.
Al-Mubārakfūrī, Ṣafiy al-Rahmān. (2014). Al-Rahīq al-Makhtūm. Dar Ibn al-Jauzi.
Al-Namlah, `Abd al-Karīm ibn `Alī. (1999). Al-Muhadhdhab fī `Ilm Uṣūl al-Fiqh al-Muqāran. Maktabah al-Rusyd.
Al-Qāḍī ‘Iyādh. (1981). As-Shifā fi bi Ta‘rīf Huqūq al-Muṣṭafā. Dar al-Fikr.
Al-Qarḍāwī, Yūsuf. (2008). Dirāsah fi Fiqh Maqāsid as-Sharī‘ah. Dar as-Syuruq.
Al-Qarḍāwī, Yūsuf. (2013). Kaifa Nata’āmul ma’a as-Sunnah. Dar as-Syuruq.
Al-Quḍāh, Sharf Mahmūd. (t.t). Hal Ahadis at-Tibb an-Nabawi Wayh?.
Al-Qurrah Dāghi, Ali., Al-Muhammadī. (2011). Fiqh al-Qaḍāyā at-Ṭibbiah al- Mu‘āsirah. Dar al-Nashā’ir al-Islamiah.
Al-Qurṭubī, Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad. (1964). Al-Jāmi` li Aḥkām al-Qur’ān. Kaherah: Dār al-Kutub al-Miṣrīah.
Al-Ṭabarī, Muḥammad ibn Jarīr. (2000). Jāmi` al-Bayān fī Ta’wīl al-Qur’ān. Mu’assasah al-Risālah.
Al-Zuḥailī, Wahbah ibn Muṣṭafā. (1418 H). Al-Tafsīr al-Munīr fi al-`Aqīdah wa al-Syarī`ah wa al-Manhaj. Dār al-Fikr al-Mu`aṣir
Ibn ‘Asyūr, Muḥammad ibn Ṭāhir. (1984). Al-Taḥrīr wa al-Tanwīr. Al-Dār al-Tūnisiah li al-Nasyr.
Ibn Battal, ‘Ali ibn Khalaf. (2003). Sharḥ Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī. Maktabah al-Rushd.
Ibn Ḥajar al-‘Asqalāni, Ahmad ibn ‘Alī. (1960). Tahqiq: Muhammad Fu’ād Abd al-Baqi dan Muḥib al-Dīn al-Khatib. Fatḥ al-Bari sharh Sāhih al-Bukhārī. Dar al-Ma’rifah.
Ibn Hazm, ‘Alī ibn Ahmad. (2004). Al-Iḥkām fi Uṣūl al-Iḥkām. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiah.
Ibn Mājah, Muhammad bin Yazīd. (2009). Tahqiq: Abu Tāhir Zubair bin ‘Alī Zay’. Sunan Ibn Mājah. Dar as-Salām lil Nasyr wa at-Tauzie’.
Ibn Qayyim al-Jauziah, Muhammad ibn Bakar. (2010). Tahqiq: Shu‘aib al-Arnouṭ dan Abd al-Qādir al-Arnouṭ. Al-Ṭibb al-Nabawī. Muassasah al-Risālah al-‘Alamiah.
Ibn Qayyim al-Jauziah, Muhammad ibn Bakar. (2014). Tahqiq: Shu‘aib al-Arnouṭ dan Abd al-Qādir al-Arnouṭ. Zād al-Ma‘ād. Muassasah al-Risālah al-‘Alamiah.
Ibn Qudāmah, ‘Abdullāh bin Aḥmad. (1998). Rauḍah al-Nāẓir wa Jannah al-Manāẓir fī Uṣūl al-Fiqh `alā Madhhab al-Imām Aḥmad ibn Ḥanbal. Al-Maktabah al-
Tudmuriyah.
Ibn Qudamah, ‘Abdullah ibn Ahmad. (2010). Al-Kafi. Dar Ibn Ḥazm.
J.W.N. Sollivan. (1973). The Limitation of Sciences. Augustus M.Kelley Publisher.
Linda Rafter, Tim Reynolds, Mark Collier, Mark Rafter, A Clinical Evaluation of Algivon Plus Manuka Honey Dressings for Chronic Wounds, Wounds UK, Vol.13, No.4, 2017
Lyn Robinson. (2010). Understanding Healthcare Information. Facet Publishing.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The copyright of this article will be vested to author(s) and granted the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license, unless otherwise stated.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
