The Readiness of History Teacher in Implementing Classroom Assessment

Abstract

This concept paper will discuss the readiness of History teacher in implementing classroom assessment in the national secondary schools. Classroom assessment is a standard medium applied by Education Ministry to measure the development of students’ holistically. 21st century History teachers need to equip themselves with higher order of skills in pedagogy, mastery of syllabus, the latest technology, learning psychology and understanding of students’ development whilst caring for their needs, thus as assessor for their students’. History teacher needs to install themselves with a certain level of knowledge, skill and attitude in order to achieve the Malaysia Education Standard of Quality (SKPM). Implementation of classroom assessment needs teachers to apply various methods and techniques in order to achieve interesting and fun learning activities. This concept paper will also discuss several recommendations to increase the level of readiness among History teacher in implementing effective classroom assessment. The recent changes in Malaysia educational system, mainly in the explosion of technology and global communication, have been seen as big challenge for History teachers in ensuring an effective, adaptive and ongoing classroom assessment in various level of knowledge. Therefore, History teacher needs to put more effort in developing and delivering knowledge and information to their students and be prepared to adapt and inculcate the various 21st century teaching methods and techniques in their lesson and assessment.

Keywords

readiness, history teachers, classroom assessment, 21stcentury teaching and learning

References

  • [1] Abdul Said & Shanti Gobalakrishnan. 2017. Tahap Integriti dan Kesediaan Guru Dengan Pelaksanaan Pentaksiran Berasaskan Sekolah. International Journal of Education, Psychology and Counselling, 2 (4): 1-22.
  • [2] Ainon Mohd. & Abdullah Hassan. 2002. Guru Sebagai Pendorong Dalam Darjah. Pahang: PTS Publications & Distributors Sdn. Bhd.
  • [3] Ekua Teyiwa Amua-Sekyi. 2016. Assessment, Student Learning and Classroom Practice: A Review. Journal of Education and Practice. 7 (21): 1-6.
  • [4] Fullan, M. 2015. Makna Baharu Perubahan Pendidikan. Terj. Kasturi Isan & Aziah Salleh. Kuala Lumpur: Institusi Terjemahan & Buku Malaysia.
  • [5] Hussain Alkharusi. 2008. Effect of Classroom Assessment Practices on Students’ Achievement Goals. Journal Education Assessment, 13 (4): 243-266.
  • [6] Kementeri Pendidikan Malaysia. 2018. Panduan Pentaksiran Bilik Darjah. Putrajaya: Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum.
  • [7] Laura Mueller. 2007. Classroom Assessment. Journal of Security Education, 2: 47-53.
  • [8] McMillan, J. H. 2011. Classroom Assessment: Principles and Practice for effective instruction. United States of America Pearson Education, Inc.
  • [9] Mohd Safarin & Nur Hidayah Ismail. 2014. Kesediaan Guru Terhadap Pelaksanaan Pentaksiran Berasaskan Sekolah Bagi Mata Pelajaran Kemahiran Hidup Bersepadu. International Seminar Teaching and Vocational Education 2014 (TVEIS 2014): 475-483.
  • [10] Mok Soon Sang. 2010. Pengurusan Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran. Selangor: Multimedia-ES Resourcee Sdn. Bhd.
  • [11] Noorzeliana Idris, Norazilawati Abdullah & Saniah Sembak. 2017. Isu dan Cabaran Pentaksiran Berasaskan Sekolah Dalam Kalangan Guru. Universiti Sultan Idris.
  • [12] Shaari. 2008. Guru Berkesan: Petua dan Panduan. Sintok. Penerbitan Universiti Utara Malaysia.
  • [13] Suresh Kumar N Vellymalay. 2015. Guru Hebat Penjana Transformasi Pendidikan Negara. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

DOI : https://doi.org/10.32698/GCS.0196