Curriculum of History Education in Malaysia, Finland and Republic of Turkey: A Comparative Literature Analysis

Abstract

History education has been labelled as a rigid, boring and least favoured subject amongst students especially primary and secondary school students. Classroom practice is said to lack consistency and often based on date’s conceptualization of the construct. Scholars have introduced variety of conceptual and practical approaches to attract student’s interest in learning history but this still lead to persistent confusion about the nature, purpose and significance of learning history. The purpose of this conceptual paper is to analyse the progress of history education in Malaysia, Finland and Republic of Turkey. We focus on the goals set by the curriculum, the common issues in learning history and the the method used in teaching and learning history in these countries. We aim to highlight the challenges at implementing the best history education curriculum in Malaysia, Finland and Republic of Turkey and where further study is needed.

Keywords

History, history education, scholars, education, method, teaching

References

  • [1] Abdul Razaq Ahmad dan Andi Suwirta. (2007) Sejarah dan Pendidikan Sejarah: Perspektif Malaysia Dan Indonesia. Bandung: Historia Utama Press
  • [2] Bury, J.B. (2010). The Idea of Progress: An Inquiry into its Origin and Growth. Online Distributed Proofreading Team.
  • [3] Carr, E.H (1961). What is History? University of Cambridge and Penguin Books.
  • [4] Emperical Research on History Education in Turkey: An Overview of Key Issues, Methods and Out-comesYearbook of ISHD: 53-67
  • [5] Hanninen et. al. (2014). A New Finnish National Core Curriculum for Basic Education and Technology as an Integrated Tool for Learning. Sense Publisher, Rotterdam.
  • [6] Hartini Husain. 2006. Achievement and attitudes of students in teaching the subject through a computer. Masters Thesis. Facultyof Education. UKM
  • [7] Hasberg, W & Erdmann E. (2012). History Teacher Education. Wochenschau Geschichte
  • [8] Jukka Rantala (2012). How Finish Adolescents Understand History: Disciplinary Thinking in History and Its Assessment among 16-Year-Old Finns. Education Sciences 2 (2012): 193–207.
  • [9] Kasmuri, A. (2009). Pendidikan Sejarah di Malaysia: Isu Penerapan Nilai dan Patriotisme [History Education in Malaysia: The Implementation of Value and Patriotism Issue]. National University of Malaysia.
  • [10] Kasmuri, A. (2009). Pendidikan Sejarah di Malaysia: Isu Penerapan Nilai dan Patriotisme [History Education in Malaysia: The Implementation of Value and Patriotism Issue]. National University of Malaysia.
  • [11] Koruroglu, A. & Baskan, GA. (2013). An Overview and History Education in Republic of Turkey and Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 89, 786 – 791.
  • [12] Krokfors, Hurmerinta &Vitikka. (2012). Tthe Finnish Core Curriculum. Sense Publishers, Rotterdam.
  • [13] Pasi Sahlberg (2014). Finnish Lessons 2.0: What Can the World Learn from Educational Change in Finland: 2nd Edition. Teachers College Columbia University New York and London.
  • [14] Pasi Silander (2015). Phenomenon Based Learning in Finland. Retrieved from http://www.phenomenaleducation.info/phenomenon-based-learning.html on August 31, 2019.
  • [15] Pasi Silander (2015). Phenomenon Based Learning in Finland. Retrieved from http://www.phenomenaleducation.info/phenomenon-based-learning.html on September 1, 2019.
  • [16] Professor Alun Munslow. (2001). What History is? Retrieved from http://www.history.ac.uk/ihr/Focus/Whatishistory/munslow6.html on August 31, 2019.
  • [17] Robiah Sidin. (1994). Pendidikan di Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Fajar Bakti.
  • [18] Sabran & Muthusamy (2016). Cross – Cultural Module: Jabatan Perpaduan Negara. Serdang: Universiti Putra Malaysia
  • Selected Publications: Turkish History Teachers Perceptions of Primary Sources in History Textbooks The New Educational Review 21 (2010): 71-78

DOI : https://doi.org/10.32698/GCS.0173