Optimization of Scan Delay in Contrast Enhanced Computed Tomography of Pancreas Using Bolus Tracking Category

Authors

  • Sudil Paudyal  Department of Radiology and Imaging, Institute of Medicine, Maharajgunj Medical Campus, Nepal
  • Damodar Rokka  Department of Radiology, National Academy of Medical Sciences, Nepal
  • Saroj Chhetry  Department of Radiology, Sahid Gangalal National Heart Center, Nepal

DOI:

https://doi.org//10.32628/IJSRST2310110

Keywords:

Bolus tracking, Computed Tomography, Optimization, Pancreas, Scan delay

Abstract

Introduction: Pancreatic pathologies present a challenge for the medical imaging professionals for detection, classification and staging. Multiphasic multidetector computed tomography provides detailed visualization and definition of deeper and smaller structures and enhancement pattern of tumors during different phases. The objective of this study was to optimize the scan delay time for contrast enhanced computed tomography of pancreas after the use of bolus tracking technique. Materials and methods: Triphasic MDCT of the pancreas was performed on 109 patients after administration of 300-350 mgI/mL contrast medium injected at 3.5 mL/s. Patients were prospectively randomized into three groups with different scanning delays for the three phases (arterial, pancreatic, and venous) after bolus tracking was triggered at 100 HU of aortic contrast enhancement. Mean attenuation values of the abdominal aorta, superior mesenteric artery, pancreatic parenchyma, splenic vein, portal vein, and hepatic parenchyma were measured. Increases in attenuation values after contrast administration were assessed. Results: Mean contrast enhancement in the aorta (change in attenuation, 313–320 HU) and the superior mesenteric artery (change in attenuation, 291–302 HU) approached peak enhancement 4-7 seconds after bolus tracking was triggered. Pancreatic parenchyma became most intensely enhanced (change in attenuation, 107–110 HU) 20-25 seconds after triggering, and then the enhancement gradually decreased. Enhancement of the splenic vein and portal vein peaked at 22 seconds. Liver parenchyma reached 71 HU, 25 seconds after triggering and reached a plateau (change in attenuation, 81-76 HU) at a further scanning delay of 45–50 seconds. Conclusion: Based on the protocol used in this study, the optimum scan delay were 4-7 seconds for arterial phase, 10-22 seconds for pancreatic parenchymal phase and 40-50 seconds for the hepatic parenchymal phase; after bolus tracking triggered at 100 HU in the abdominal aorta.

References

  1. Haaga John R., Charlez F. Lanzier; CT and MR Imaging of the whole body. 4th Edition USA. Mosby 2002
  2. Adam A, Dixon AK; A textbook of Medical Imaging. 5th edition, USA, Churchill Livingstone
  3. Ryan Stephanie, McNicholas Michelle, Eustace Stephen; The Abdomen. Anatomy for Diagnostic Imaging. 2nd Edition Ireland. C  Elsevier Limited 2004
  4. Kondo H, Kanematsu M, Goshima S et al. MDCT of the pancreas: Optimizing Scanning Delay with a bolus-tracking technique for pancreatic, peripancreatic vascular and hepatic contrast enhancement. AJR:188, March 2007
  5. Fletcher JG, Wiersema MJ, Farrell MA, et al. Pancreatic malignancy: value of arterial, pancreatic, and hepatic phase imaging with multi–detector row CT. Radiology 2003; 229:81–90
  6. Goshima S, Kanematsu M, Kondo H, et al. Pancreas: Optimal scan delay for contrast enhanced multi-detector row CT. Radiology 2006;241(1):167-174
  7. Hollett MD, Jorgensen MJ, Jeffrey RB Jr. Quantitative evaluation of pancreatic enhancement during dual-phase helical CT. Radiology 1995;195:359–361.
  8. Hu H, He D, Foley D, Fox SH. Four multidetector- row helical CT: image quality and volume coverage speed. Radiology 2000;215: 55–62.
  9. Berland LL, Smith JK. Multidetector-array CT: once again, technology creates new opportunities. Radiology 1998;209:327–329.
  10. Bae KT. Peak contrast enhancement in CT and MR angiography: when does it occur and why? pharmacokinetic study in a porcine model. Radiology 2003;227:809–816.
  11. Hollet MD, Jorgensen MJ, Jeffery RB Jr; Quantitative evaluation of pancreatic enhancement during dual phase helical CT. Radiology 1995; 195(2):359-361
  12. Lu DS, Vedantham S, Krasny RM, Kadell B, Berger WL, Reber HA. Two-phase helical CT for pancreatic tumors: pancreatic versus hepatic phase enhancement of tumor, pancreas, and vascular structures. Radiology 1996; 199:697–701
  13. McNulty NJ, Francis IR, Platt JF, et al. Multi–detector row helical CT of the pancreas: effect of contrast- enhanced multiphasic imaging on enhancement of the pancreas, peripancreatic vasculature, and pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Radiology 2001; 220:97–102
  14. Goshima S, Kanematsu M, Nishibori H, et al., CT of the pancreas; Radiology 2011; 260; 139-147
  15. Tublin ME, Tessler FN, Cheng SL, Peters TL, McGovern PC. Effect of injection rate of contrast medium on pancreatic and hepatic helical CT. Radiology 1999; 210:97–101
  16. Kim T, Murakami T, Takahashi S, et al. Pancreatic CT imaging: effects of different injection rates and doses of contrast material. Radiology 1999; 212:219–225

Downloads

Published

2023-02-28

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

[1]
Sudil Paudyal, Damodar Rokka, Saroj Chhetry, " Optimization of Scan Delay in Contrast Enhanced Computed Tomography of Pancreas Using Bolus Tracking Category, International Journal of Scientific Research in Science and Technology(IJSRST), Online ISSN : 2395-602X, Print ISSN : 2395-6011, Volume 10, Issue 1, pp.159-166, January-February-2023. Available at doi : https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRST2310110