The Factors Affecting HDI Indonesia

Authors

  • Rita Fidella  BPS-Statistic of Tanggamus Regency, Lampung. Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org//10.32628/IJSRSET218629

Keywords:

Function expenditure of local government, HDI, klassen typology, panel data regression

Abstract

This research aims to determine the factors affecting human development index (HDI) in regency/city in Indonesia. Based on data from BPS (Statistics Indonesia), human development index (HDI) of each regency/city in Indonesia has a heterogeneous achievement value from the low, middle to high categories of HDI. This indicates that there are still underdeveloped areas and inequality in human development in Indonesia. Meanwhile, regional government expenditure on education, health, and economic functions tends to increase considerably each year. The methods used were panel data regressions with time series data from 2011-2017 and cross section data of 465 regencies/cities in Indonesia. Econometrics results show variables that have significant positive effect on HDI, which are regional government expenditure on education function, health function, economic function, GRDP (Gross Regional Domestic Product), education infrastructure (number of junior high schools), health infrastructure (number of community health center), and BPK (The Audit Board of Indonesia) opinion. While poverty has negative effect, infrastructure (road length) has no effect. To avoid inequality from affecting human development in Indonesia, the government role to prioritize human development in regency/city with HDI achievement values that are still low or underdeveloped is necessary. These contributions can be made by prioritizing expenditure on health, education, and economic functions in the regional budget.

References

  1. S. C. Smith and M. Todaro, Economic Development, Twelfth ed. New York, 2015.
  2. A. Afonso, W. Ebert, and L. Schuknecht, “Quality of Public Finances and Growth", Working Paper  Series No. 438/ February, 2005.
  3. R. K. Edeme, “Analyzing the Effects of Sectoral Public Spending on Human Development in Nigeria: Evidence from Panel Data,” IOSR J. Humanit. Soc. Sci., vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 01–13, 2014.
  4. M. Lokshin and R. Yemtsov, “Has Rural Infrastructure Rehabilitation in Georgia Helped the Poor?,” 2005
  5. E. Colantonio, R. Marianacci, and N. Mattoscio, “on Human Capital and Economic Development: Some Results for Africa,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 9, pp. 266–272, 2010.
  6. N. Berlian VA, “Faktor-faktor yang Terkait dengan Rendahnya Pencapaian Wajib Belajar Pendidikan Dasar 9 Tahun,” J. Pendidik. dan Kebud, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 43–55, 2011.
  7. A. M. N. Renzaho, S. Chitekw, W. Chen, S. Rijal, T. Dhakal, and P. Dahal, “The Synergetic Effect of Cash Transfers for Families, Child Sensitive Social Protection Programs, and Capacity Building for Effective Social Protection on Children’s Nutritional Status in Nepal,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 14, no. 12, pp. 1–22, 2017.
  8. T. K. Kim and S. R. Lane, “Government Health Expenditure and Public Health Outcomes : A Comparative Study among 17 Countries and Implications for US Health Care Reform,” Am. Int. J. Contemp. Res., vol. 3, no. 9, pp. 8–13, 2013.
  9. D. Nugraheni and D. S. Priyarsono, “Kinerja Keuangan Daerah,    Infrastruktur,    dan    Kemiskinan :    Analisis Kabupaten / Kota di Indonesia 2006 – 2009,” J. Ekon. dan Pembang. Indones., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 148–167, 2012.
  10. E. Sofilda, M. Hamzah, and A. SS, “Human Development and Poverty in Papua Province (an Analysis of Simultaneous Approach on Panel Data Regression),” OIDA Int. J. Sustain. Dev., vol. 06, no. 06, pp. 51–62, 2013
  11. Fransisco, “Strategi Alokasi Belanja Pemerintah Daerah dalam Meningkatkan IPM di Provinsi Jambi,” J. Manaj. Pembang. Drh., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 1–13, 2016.
  12. E. Sofilda, P. Hermiyanti, and M. Hamzah, “Determinant Variable Analysis of Human Development Index in Indonesia (Case for High and Low Index at Period 2004-2013),” OIDA Int. J. Sustain. Dev., vol. 08, no. 09, pp. 11–28, 2015.
  13. Z. M. Y. Latuconsina, “Analisis Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Indeks Pembangunan Manusia Kabupaten Malang Berbasis Pendekatan Perwilayahan dan Regresi Panel,” J. Reg. Rural Dev. Plan., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 202–216, 2017.
  14. H. Dewi, “Kinerja pembangunan daerah : suatu evaluasi terhadap kursus keuangan daerah,” Bogor Agricultural University, 2015.
  15. N. G. Mankiw, of Principles, 3rd edition. New York, 2003.
  16. Bappenas, Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Program Wajib Belajar Pendidikan Dasar 9 Tahun. Jakarta (ID): Bappenas, 2009.

International Journal of Scientific Research in Science, Engineering and Technology

Downloads

Published

2021-12-30

Issue

Volume 8, Issue 6, November-December-2021

Section

Research Articles

License

Copyright (c) IJSRSET

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

[1]
Rita Fidella, " The Factors Affecting HDI Indonesia, International Journal of Scientific Research in Science, Engineering and Technology(IJSRSET), Print ISSN : 2395-1990, Online ISSN : 2394-4099, Volume 8, Issue 6, pp.160-167, November-December-2021. Available at doi : https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRSET218629