의료기관의 도매상 선정을 위한 평가지표 개발 - 델파이 기법 활용 중심으로

@article{ART002747731},
author={ 손은선 and 김재송 and 금민정 and 권경희 },
title={의료기관의 도매상 선정을 위한 평가지표 개발 - 델파이 기법 활용 중심으로},
journal={병원약사회지},
issn={1226-640X},
year={2021},
volume={38},
number={3},
pages={351-369},
doi={10.32429/jkshp.2021.38.3.006},
url={http://dx.doi.org/10.32429/jkshp.2021.38.3.006}

TY - JOUR
AU - 손은선
AU - 김재송
AU - 금민정
AU - 권경희
TI - 의료기관의 도매상 선정을 위한 평가지표 개발 - 델파이 기법 활용 중심으로
T2 - 병원약사회지
PY - 2021
VL - 38
IS - 3
PB - 한국병원약사회
SP - 351-369
SN - 1226-640X
AB - Background : Medical centers generally spend billions to hundreds of billions of Won annually to purchase medicines. More than 3,000 domestic wholesalers are needed. It is important to know how to select wholesalers to promote safe and reasonable drug distribution. So far, many studies have been performed on wholesalers in Korea. However, tools for evaluating these wholesalers have not yet been developed. Methods : In this study, we reviewed the supply chain management factors in drug distribution management standards (Korean Good Supplying Practice; KGSP) and international distribution management standards (Good Distribution Practice; GDP). We performed a focus group interview with hospital pharmacists and wholesalers in order to improve and evaluate the initially proposed evaluation tools. The first round of Delphi survey and reliability analysis were carried out. Results : The reliability and validity of the Delphi technique were assessed. We did not conduct the Delphi survey in the second round because there was a high level of agreement in the first round. We developed 51 categories in 14 chapters of wholesaler evaluation items, and we confirmed their high validity and reliability. Conclusion : It is expected that medical centers may utilize this evaluation tools as a basis for selecting wholesalers and also as data for improving wholesale quality. In addition, wholesale businesses may be promoted to a higher level and may conduct objective and standardized quality management through efforts to comply with the evaluation standards.
KW - Wholesalers, Evaluation, Tools, Delphi survey
DO - 10.32429/jkshp.2021.38.3.006
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.32429/jkshp.2021.38.3.006
ER -

손은선 , 김재송 , 금민정 and 권경희 (2021). 의료기관의 도매상 선정을 위한 평가지표 개발 - 델파이 기법 활용 중심으로. 병원약사회지, 38( 3), 351- 369.

손은선 , 김재송 , 금민정 and 권경희 . 2021, “의료기관의 도매상 선정을 위한 평가지표 개발 - 델파이 기법 활용 중심으로”, 병원약사회지, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 351-369. Available from: doi:10.32429/jkshp.2021.38.3.006

손은선 김재송 et al. 금민정 권경희 “의료기관의 도매상 선정을 위한 평가지표 개발 - 델파이 기법 활용 중심으로” 병원약사회지 38.3 pp. 351-369 (2021): 351.

손은선 , 김재송 , 금민정 , 권경희 . 의료기관의 도매상 선정을 위한 평가지표 개발 - 델파이 기법 활용 중심으로 병원약사회지 [Internet]. 2021; 38( 3), : 351-369. Available from: doi:10.32429/jkshp.2021.38.3.006

손은선 , 김재송 , 금민정 and 권경희 . “의료기관의 도매상 선정을 위한 평가지표 개발 - 델파이 기법 활용 중심으로” 병원약사회지 38, no.3 (2021): 351-369. doi: 10.32429/jkshp.2021.38.3.006

홈 권호 목록 논문 목록 논문 상세

의료기관의 도매상 선정을 위한 평가지표 개발 - 델파이 기법 활용 중심으로

병원약사회지

약어 : JKSHP

2021, vol.38, no.3, pp.351 - 369

DOI : 10.32429/jkshp.2021.38.3.006

발행기관 : 한국병원약사회

연구분야 : 약학

손은선¹ , 김재송² , 금민정³ , 권경희⁴

¹연세대학교의료원 세브란스병원 약무국

²연세대학교의료원 세브란스병원 약무국

³연세대학교 세브란스병원 약무국

⁴동국대학교

인용한 논문 수 : 2 서지 간략 보기

초록

Background : Medical centers generally spend billions to hundreds of billions of Won annually to purchase medicines. More than 3,000 domestic wholesalers are needed. It is important to know how to select wholesalers to promote safe and reasonable drug distribution. So far, many studies have been performed on wholesalers in Korea. However, tools for evaluating these wholesalers have not yet been developed. Methods : In this study, we reviewed the supply chain management factors in drug distribution management standards (Korean Good Supplying Practice; KGSP) and international distribution management standards (Good Distribution Practice; GDP). We performed a focus group interview with hospital pharmacists and wholesalers in order to improve and evaluate the initially proposed evaluation tools. The first round of Delphi survey and reliability analysis were carried out. Results : The reliability and validity of the Delphi technique were assessed. We did not conduct the Delphi survey in the second round because there was a high level of agreement in the first round. We developed 51 categories in 14 chapters of wholesaler evaluation items, and we confirmed their high validity and reliability. Conclusion : It is expected that medical centers may utilize this evaluation tools as a basis for selecting wholesalers and also as data for improving wholesale quality. In addition, wholesale businesses may be promoted to a higher level and may conduct objective and standardized quality management through efforts to comply with the evaluation standards.

키워드

Wholesalers, Evaluation, Tools, Delphi survey

참고문헌(28)

[인터넷자료] Ministry of Food and Drug Safety / 2020statistics on food and drug industrial trend
[인터넷자료] Health Insurance Review & Assessment service / 2019 statistics of pharmaceutical supply
[인터넷자료] Ministry of Health and Welfare / Third cycle acute care hospital accreditation standards
[인터넷자료] Ministry of Food and Drug Safety / Korea Good Supplying Practice (KGSP) commentary
[인터넷자료] uropean Union / Good Distribution Practice of medicinal products for human use
[인터넷자료] United States Pharmacopeia and The National Formulary (USP–NF) / <1083>Good Distribution Practice - Supply Chain Integrity
[인터넷자료] World Health Organization (WHO) / Good Distribution Practices for Pharmaceutical Products. Technical Report Series, No. 957, Annex 5 / Geneva(CH); 2010 [cited
[인터넷자료] Pharmaceutical inspection co-operation scheme (PIC/S) / PIC/S Guide to Good Distribution Practice for Medicinal Products
[기타] Joint Commission International (JCI) / 2020 / JCI Accreditation Standards for Hospitals
[학술지] Kitzinger J. / 2006 / Focus groups / Qualitative research in health care 3 : 21 ~ 31
[학술지] 최용석 / 2008 / 델파이기법을 이용한 U-city사업의 핵심성공요인 도출 / 인터넷전자상거래연구 8 (3) : 183 ~ 209
[학술지] Van Zolingen SJ / 2003 / Selection processes in a Delphi study about key qualifications in senior secondary vocational education / Technological forecasting and social change 70 (4) : 317 ~ 340
[학술지] Noh SY / 2006 / Delphi technique : Predict the future with professional insights / Planning and Policy 299 : 53 ~ 62
[학술지] Park GJ / 2008 / Real-time delphi technique / Planning and Policy 317 : 132 ~ 139
[학술지] 임은애 / 2012 / 전문가 델파이 조사를 통한 원예치료 평가지표 구성요소 개발 / 원예과학기술지 30 (3) : 308 ~ 324
[보고서] Kang YJ / 2008 / Understanding and Application of Delphi Techniques : 1 ~ 17
[학술지] Lawshe CH / 1975 / A quantitative approach to content validity / Personnel psychology 28 (4) : 563 ~ 575
[학술지] 홍석수 / 2013 / 델파이 기법을 활용한 절충교역 기술가치평가 분석지표 개발 / 기술혁신학회지 16 (1) : 252 ~ 278
[단행본] Fein, Adam J. / 2019 / The 2019-20 Economic Report on Pharmaceutical Wholesalers and Specialty Distributors / Drug Channels Institute
[보고서] Hwang IK / 2014 / A study on the development direction of the general wholesale (OTC) distribution business-focusing on the wholesale margin rate
[보고서] Lee EK / 2007 / Policy measures to ensure transparency and advancement of drug distribution
[보고서] Park HK / 2008 / Research on the advancement of drug distribution
[보고서] Jung YT / 2010 / A study on the development of pharmaceutical wholesalers industry
[보고서] Yu SY / 2015 / Survey on the status of distribution of pharmaceuticals wholesalers
[보고서] Lee JH / 2020 / Policy Research Report
[학술지] Hong CG / 1995 / Evaluation of medical institutions and improvement of medical quality-overall direction / Quality Improvement in Health Care 2 (1) : 20 ~ 23
[학술지] 이영환 / 2015 / 의료기관 인증 후 환자안전 및 질 관리 변화와 경영활동 변화 간의 관계: 정신병원과 요양병원 대상 / 한국콘텐츠학회 논문지 15 (1) : 286 ~ 299
[학술지] 이규식 / 2012 / 의료기관평가인증의 목표와 과제 / 대한의사협회지 55 (1) : 7 ~ 16