Incomplete

Automatic Testing Systems (ATS) have become widely used to assist in fault detection of electronic devices, especially in the field of avionics. These systems have widely varying capabilities, and can range in size from large 6-foot racks of equipment to small PC-based testers. Selecting the individual systems can be a complex procedure, depending on many variables such as cost, dependability, and transportability. This paper presents an object-oriented knowledge-based approach to making intelligent decisions about the most optimal selection of these testers. It is believed that such an approach could be highly beneficial to organizations that utilize these ATS by helping to save time, money, and other relevant resources.

Fig. 1a should have a clearer design and description because, as it is now, looks that IL-15 appears because of the antigen pulse, while in the description is understood that before the DC is engineered to express IL-15 then it is pulsed with HCP to present the tumor antigen on MHC I complex.In Fig. 6a, due to the dimension of the mice, is not immediate to recognize what are the symbols related to the syringes (cells or therapy), and the last mouse (for imaging) doesn't show the orthotopic tumor, only metastatic lungs.The texts on page 5 lines 77-82 and 88-90 should be put together and remodeled to avoid repetitions.Since HSP-70 is highly represented in 4T1 and CT26 cancer cells, why not obtain it directly from cultured cell lines instead of using cells dissociated from tumors developed in animals?An in vivo tumor is not homogeneous as in the cultured cell line due to the components of the tissue in which the cells are inoculated and developed.The presence of other cells positive to HSP-70, also in the tissue indicated as NT in the images, increases the possibility of a not fully pure HSP-70-Ag (HCP) of only tumor origin (even though prevalent).
In preliminary experiments, were the HCP alone co-incubated with CD8+ cells to see their potential to directly prime CTL in vitro?If it was done, it should be fine as a note in the Discussion.At page 7 line 133 do you mean "50µg HCP/l /g tumor tissue"?Please, revise the "Supplementary and additional material" part because suppliers of materials and type/company of used instruments (ELISPOT reader; Spectrophotometer; Cytotoxicity Detection Kit; Exosome Spin Column; D-Luciferin; in vivo imaging system; imaging analysis software, etc.) are not always cited.In Animal studies (Supplementary,(143)(144)(145)(146), the source, age and rearing conditions of animals are not indicated.In Flow cytometry (lines 220-226) should be indicated that the described procedure is for identifying the TILs.Was CD45, used to gate immune cells?To stain Foxp3 is necessary permeabilization of the cells, but here it is not described; please add this passage and the method that you used.In the Immunohistochemistry assay (lines 252-259) the block of endogenous peroxidases is indicated but not the inhibition of the block to prevent non-specific antibody binding and reduce background and prevent false positive results using sera or a protein.Please, show it, if it was performed.The indication of time is sometimes variable, either in minutes or in fractions (e.g.0.03) of the hour.To use only one modality is recommended.Why to produce an orthotopic tumor and metastases in the same animal if the aim of looking for anti-tumor therapy was already done?Generally, the orthotopic implant of tumor cells is used to study metastasis by following the spontaneous spread from the primary tumor (it takes time).The i.v.(in the tail veins -never cited in the text) injection of cells for lung colonization is a quicker simulation of the metastatic process (very used, even though biologically not overlap the natural process).Two pathologic conditions together may influence each other and increase animal suffering.What was the reason of this choice?It should be indicated.Some revision of English might be useful, especially in Methods.
Reviewer #3: Remarks to the Author: In this manuscript, Wang et al. developed a biomimetic nanovaccine with multivalent IL-15 selftranspresentation (MIST) using cytomembrane vesicles from dendritic cells infected by adenovirus expressing IL15 and IL15Ralpha, together with tumor antigens.They characterized the nanovaccine platform in size, in vivo distribution, biosafety, and most importantly, antitumor efficacy in multiple mouse tumor models.Overall I think it is a nice study with well-designed experiments and impressive results, but a bit short of biological insights.I have a few questions about this manuscript: 1.By using dendritic cell membrane as the surrogate source of antigen-MHC complex to stimulate T cells has been reported previously by the same group and other groups, e.g. as in references 23 and 30.The authors may want to explicitly describe how this current study differ from the previous studies using similar strategy for T cell stimulation besides IL15 transpresntation.
2. How would the authors define the cytomembrane vesicles?Do they contain membrane debris or exosomes?Or are they equivalent to the exosomes?3.In the results description for tumor immune micrioenvironment analysis in Fig. 4C, the authors suggested that MIST treatment converted M2 to M1 macrophages, but in Fig. 5F and S5, S9, the infiltration number of F4/80+ cells increased as well as CD8+ cells.F4/80 is generally considered a pan marker for macrophage, why would the MIST treatment increase the total number of tumorinfiltrating macrophages?4. The authors used recombinant IL15 as a control group.In the method part, the authors only mentioned that the recombinant IL15 was from Abcam Inc. without Cat # information.Is the recombinant IL15 is the monomer cytokine only, or the IL15-IL15Ralpha heterodimer complex as the authors expressed in dendritic cells?This is important, as the latter can better serve as a control group for the MIST treatment group.For example, NIZ985, a recombinant heterodimer of IL15-IL15Ralpha, are currently under clinical trials for cancer therapy.So in my opinion the MIST platform, but not the transpresentation, is the major point of this manuscript.56.Minor points: In the introduction part, page 4, line 56-58, the authors wrote: "IL-15 supports the generation and survival of memory T cells, while IL-2 promotes immunosuppressive regulatory T cell (Treg) expansion".This is misleading, as IL2 is a T cell survival factor for all T cell subsets including effector T cells and Tregs.In another sentence, the authors claimed "In addition, the distinct size of IL-15 is below the renal filtration threshold (<40 kDa), resulting in rapid clearance and short-lived effects."This is partially true, but it is not the main reason for the limit of IL15 clinical use.For example, IFNalpha and IL2 are also small proteins, but both have been approved by FDA for cancer treatment.Please revise these sentences to accurately describe the current limit of clinical use of cytokines in cancer therapy.
Title: Biomimetic nanovaccine-mediated multivalent IL-15 self-transpresentation (MIST) for potent and safe cancer immunotherapy Dear reviewers, We are truly grateful for your constructive comments.We have made substantial changes.The revisions are highlighted in red.We also provide below a point-by-point response to the comments.
We appreciate the critical reviews of the manuscript and hope the revised version has been improved to a significant degree to merit further consideration for publication.Response: We appreciate the reviewer's comments.To further evaluate the antitumor efficacy of biNV-IL-15, we constructed a heterodimer cytokine (IL-15 superagonist, IL-15:IL-15Rα) consisting of IL-15 and IL-15Rα, which was produced and purified from a cloned cell line derived from the HEK293 cell line transfected with optimized plasmid DNA encoding IL-15 and IL-15Rα (J Immunother Cancer. 2020, 8(1), e000599;J Biol Chem. 2013, 288(25), 18093-18103).We then compared the therapeutic outcomes of IL-15:IL-15Rα, IL-15:IL-15Rα+biNV, and biNV-IL-15 in the 15:IL-15Rα and IL-15:IL-15Rα+biNV, biNV-IL-15 exhibited superior antitumor activity, antirecurrence effect, and metastasis-inhibitory ability, demonstrating the potential for practical clinical application.The immune responses after various treatments were also explored through flow cytometric assays.The results indicated that biNV-IL-15 treatment effectively activated antitumor immunity including improved proportion of CD8 + T cells, M1-type macrophage polarization, and increased TEM percentage, demonstrating significant advantages over IL-15:IL-15Rα and IL-15:IL-15Rα+biNV.

Response to
The results were discussed in the revised manuscript : "Furthermore, the 4T1 tumor model was also established to compare the therapeutic outcomes of heterodimeric IL-15 (IL-15:IL-15Rα) and the MIST platform (Supplementary Fig. 9a).As shown in Supplementary Fig. 9b, the biNV-IL-15 exhibited superior antitumor activity compared with IL-15:IL-15Rα and IL-15:IL-15Rα+biNV, leading to prolonged survival period of mice"; "The flow cytometric assays were also performed in  9c, d)"; "Furthermore, the tumor resection model was also established to compare the anti-recurrence effects of heterodimeric IL-15 and the MIST platform (Supplementary Fig. 16a).As shown in Supplementary Fig. 16b-d (Supplementary Fig. 16i-n)"; "Moreover, the hematogenous metastasis model was also established to compare the antimetastatic ability of heterodimeric IL-15 and the MIST platform (Supplementary Fig. 19a).As shown in Supplementary Fig. 19b-k   Response: We appreciate the reviewer's comments.As suggested, the reference has been added.Response: We appreciate the reviewer's comments.As reviewer suggested, we have improved the In Flow cytometry (lines 220-226) should be indicated that the described procedure is for identifying the TILs.Was CD45, used to gate immune cells?To stain Foxp3 is necessary permeabilization of the cells, but here it is not described; please add this passage and the method that you used.

The manuscript needs some upgrades and minor revisions:
Response: We appreciate the reviewer's comments.As reviewer suggested, we have indicated in the revised manuscript that the described procedure is to identify the TILs.CD45 was not used to gate immune cells.This procedure was widely used in many articles (J Am Chem Soc. 2022, 144(2), 787-797; ACS Nano.2023, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.3c01733).For Foxp3 staining, the description of cell permeabilization has been added to the method.Response: We appreciate the reviewer's comments.As reviewer suggested, we explained in the main text why 4T1-luc tumor cells were additionally injected i.v."The additional tail vein injection of tumor cells into tumor-bearing mice to simulate hematogenous metastasis has been widely applied as an artificial whole-body spreading tumor model (Nat Commun. 2019, 10, 2025;Nat Commun. 2016, 7, 13193;ACS Nano. 2019, 13(5), 5662-5673;Nano Today. 2020, 35, 100987).Compared with spontaneous lung metastasis, the whole-body metastasis model was more aggressive and challenging, which was suitable for specialized anti-metastasis evaluation."

Some revision of English might be useful, especially in Methods.
Response: We appreciate the reviewer's comments.As reviewer suggested, we have carefully revised the English, especially in Methods.Response: We appreciate the reviewer's comments.By considering their hydrophilic cavity and hydrophobic bilayer structure, as well as their inherent biocompatibility, we sought to harness the exceptional features of biosynthetic cytomembrane vesicles for efficient therapeutic transportation.
In our previous studies, we have successfully developed a range of biosynthetic cytomembrane vesicles that can serve as customizable shells for delivering bio-functional moieties and therapeutic entities (Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2015, 112(45), E6129-E6138;Angewandte Chemie. 2018, 130(38), 12679-12683;Adv Mater. 2019, 31(17), 1808294;Nat Nanotechnol. 2022, 17(5), 531-540).Our primary goal was to develop it as a versatile and adaptable model platform for future clinical applications.To achieve this, we have established a standardized operating procedure that ensures scaled synthesis and proper quality control of the cytomembrane vesicles.
In contrast to the traditional modification methods such as multivalent electrostatic interactions, receptor-ligand binding, and hydrophobic insertion, our genetic decorating procedure with desired proteins on the surface successfully hijacks the cellular activity and has several unique advantages: 1) the artificial proteins/peptides/domains can avoid undesired protein orientation, structural distortions and interfere with the existed membrane proteins because of cellular strict genetic control expression system; 2) the integrated proteins could have more post-translational modifications (e.g., glycosylation, acetylation, phosphorylation) that are critically important for their biological functions; 3) the existence of degeneracy and usage bias for genetic codes has excellent benefits for the same functional proteins expressing in different species but maintain their original sequence information and functions.
In this study, we synthesized genetically engineered biNV-IL-15 to enable multivalent IL-15 selftranspresentation.This approach resulted in extended blood circulation, an enhanced therapeutic window, and the ability to manipulate therapeutic T cells in a spatiotemporal manner, facilitating a broad spectrum antigen-specific T cell response with minimal systemic side effects.This platform technology demonstrates remarkable safety, effectiveness, and versatility, providing a promising solution to the challenges encountered in the clinical application of IL-15.Importantly, it introduces a novel approach for the practical implementation of cytokine therapy in clinical settings.
In terms of using dendritic cell membrane as the surrogate source of antigen-MHC complex to stimulate T cells, we isolated primary bone marrow-derived DCs (BMDCs) for genetic engineering and antigen pulse in this study.In contrast, the DC2.4 cells used in references 23 and 30 are an immortalized cell line derived from C57BL/6 mice.Compared with primary dendritic cells, DC2.4 cells exhibit some functional differences and deficiencies (J Pharm Pharmaceut Sci. 2010, 13(1), 21-26).Moreover, the 4T1 and CT26 tumor models were derived from BALB/c mice, so the primary BMDCs from the same strain of mice are more reliable than DC2.4.In addition, we chose endogenous HSP70-chaperoned polypeptides (HCP) as tumor antigens to pulse BMDCs in this study instead of the commonly used model antigen ovalbumin (OVA).For many tumors, most endogenous tumor antigens are unknown.Studies have reported that HSP70 acts as a chaperone for several polypeptides that can generate tumor antigens, which can be represented by MHC molecules and elicit CD8 + T cell responses (Science. 1997, 278(5335), 117-120;Annu Rev Immunol. 2002, 20(1): 395-425).The immunogenic nature of the HCP allows for their novel use in personalized immunotherapy of cancer (Adv Sci. 2020, 7(1), 1900069).Our primary goal is to translate this versatile and adaptable cytokine delivery platform into clinical practice.As part of our future preclinical development, we intend to collect tumor samples directly from patients.This approach of isolating HCP from tumor tissue, rather than relying on cultured cell lines or model antigens, holds greater relevance for clinical application.

How would the authors define the cytomembrane vesicles? Do they contain membrane debris
or exosomes?Or are they equivalent to the exosomes?
Response: We appreciate the reviewer's comments.The cytomembrane vesicles were different from exosomes and were isolated according to the following process (Fig. 1b).First, we gathered and washed the DCs twice in cold PBS containing protease inhibitor for removing cell debris.The DCs were then resuspended in PBS and sonicated in the sterile EP tube on ice.The cytomembrane vesicles were collected by multistep density gradient ultracentrifugation, and suspended in PBS.Finally, we introduced the isolated cytomembrane vesicles to the Mini-Extruder (Avanti Polar Lipids) with 200 nm pore-sized membrane filter in PBS to acquire uniform cytomembrane vesicles.The cytomembrane vesicles produced from the natural cell membrane have emerged as a promising alternative for biotherapy (Nat Nanotechnol. 2022, 17(5), 531-540;Angewandte Chemie. 2018, 130(38), 12679-12683;Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2015, 112(45), E6129-E6138).The inspiration for cytomembrane vesicles comes from the hijacking host cell machinery of enveloped viruses and the subsequent release (budding process) from the infected cells.Once the original cells are treated by ultrasonic crushing, cell membrane fragments will undergo a reassembly process to form cytomembrane vesicles (Adv Sci. 2021, 8(21), 2100460).
As is well known to all, the exosomes are naturally secreted from all cell types and bodily fluids, which are enclosed by a phospholipid membrane bilayer.Exosomes are generated in multi-vesicular bodies (MVBs) and secreted when MVBs fuse with the cytoplasmic membrane.In the process, not only some specific transmembrane proteins like CD9, CD63, CD81, CD82 were anchored as a specific marker; the lumen of exosomes also possesses many biological contents, such as soluble enzymes, mitochondrial DNA, mRNA, microRNA, or other functional genes.Their inherent merits to transfer cargos have improved their possibility of being used to deliver a variety of agents, including chemotherapeutics, miRNAs, siRNAs, proteins, and even nanoparticles (Nat Cell Biol. 2007, 9(6), 654-659;Adv Drug Delivery Rev. 2016, 106, 148-156).Nevertheless, the inherent substances in the lumen have their unique function that may increase the complexity of components for therapeutic application (ACS Nano. 2017, 11(1), 69-83;Cancer Res. 2003, 63(15), 4331-4337).
Compared with the secreted exosomes, the cytomembrane vesicles possess similar morphological structures, physicochemical properties, and membrane protein components but contain relatively smaller amounts of cellular RNA and other soluble proteins (Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2015, 112(45), E6129-E6138).In addition, the cytomembrane vesicles produced from the reassembled cell membrane fraction exhibit high productivity to meet clinical needs (ACS Nano. 2013, 7(9), 7698-7710).Therefore, the cytomembrane vesicles may provide an alternative choice for exogenous substances or functional moieties delivery (Fig. R2).Response: We appreciate the reviewer's comments.Derived from blood monocytes, macrophages can be recruited by chemokines produced in the tumor microenvironment and therefore infiltrate tumor sites.Among those chemokines, CC chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2) is shown not only to be the most potent chemoattractant factor for monocytes but also to be able to activate them for tumor cell killing (Cell Mol Immunol. 2018, 15(4), 335-345;Cancer Lett. 2021, 499, 148-163).Many studies have revealed that IL-15 transpresentation could upregulate the production of CCL2 (J Exp Med. 2006Med. , 203(10), 2329Med. -2338;;J Immunol. 2008, 180(10), 6477-6483;J Immunother Cancer. 2020, 8(1), e000599), which participates in macrophage recruitment into the tumor site.To explain why the MIST treatment could increase the total number of tumor-infiltrating macrophages, we investigated the levels of CCL2 in tumor tissues through immunohistochemical staining.As shown in Fig. R3- Wang and colleagues examines the biology and efficacy of a biomimetic nanovacine in which IL-15 superagonist, TAA/MHCI and co-stimulatory molecules are anchored to DC-derived cytomembrane vescicles.The authors report that the nanovaccine has a longer plasma half-life, elicits potent T cell responses, has minimal in vivo toxicity and is efficacious against several syngeneic tumor models.The authors should be complemented on developing a complex cell-based immunotherapeutic that harnesses many of the beneficial effects of IL-15 while minimizing toxicity in mice.Some of the hurdles for translation to humans are the current use of an adenovirus in the construct and the complex manufacturing process.Nevertheless, the authors provide good proof of concept data in mice.The following comments are offered.1.The efficacy and safety of the construct is quite good based on the presented data.The authors use free IL-15 as a major control in their studies.IL-15 superagonist (IL-15/IL-15rα) is more potent and is considered to be more favorable from an antitumor efficacy and drug development perspective.Some comment on their choice of IL-15 as a control is warranted.
4T1 tumor model established to compare the efficacy of heterodimeric IL-15 and the MIST platform.As shown in Supplementary Fig. 9c, e, biNV-IL-15 effectively enhanced the proportion of CD8 + T cells and decreased the immunosuppressive Tregs in tumors and dLNs, displaying obvious advantages over IL-15:IL-15Rα and IL-15:IL-15Rα+biNV.Meanwhile, biNV-IL-15 significantly remodeled TAMs from M2 type to M1 type and upregulated TEM level in the spleen in comparison with IL-15:IL-15Rα and IL-15:IL-15Rα+biNV (Supplementary Fig.

2.
Body weight and organ injury are good endpoints for assessing toxicity.Splenomegaly and increased plasma cytokines are common problems in mice treated with IL-15 superagonist.Did the authors assess spleen size and plasma cytokines in their study?Response: We appreciate the reviewer's comments.As reviewer suggested, we further assessed spleen size and serum inflammatory cytokines (CXCL10 and IL-6) of mice treated with biNV-IL-15 and IL-15 superagonist (IL-15:IL-15Rα).Compared with biNV-IL-15, IL-15:IL-15Rα induced an obvious splenomegaly and significantly increased serum levels of inflammatory cytokines such as CXC motif chemokine ligand 10 (CXCL10) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) (Fig. R1), confirming the superior safety of the MIST platform.

Figure R1 .
Figure R1.The assessment of spleen size and serum inflammatory cytokines after biNV-IL-15 administration.(a) Photographs and (b) quantification of spleen/body weight ratios of mice after treatment with PBS, biNV-IL-15, and IL-15:IL-15Rα on days 0 and 3 (n = 5/group).For the detection of serum inflammatory cytokines, BALB/c mice were treated with PBS, biNV-IL-15, and IL-15:IL-15Rα on days 0 and 3. Blood was collected at 12 h after the last treatment.Levels of (c) CXCL10 and (d) IL-6 in the serum were measured (n = 5/group).Data represent the mean ± s.d.Statistical significance was calculated through one-way ANOVA using a Tukey post-hoc test (b-d).

Fig.1a should
Fig.1a should have a clearer design and description because, as it is now, looks that IL-15 appears because of the antigen pulse, while in the description is understood that before the DC is engineered to express IL-15 then it is pulsed with HCP to present the tumor antigen on MHC I complex.
Immunohistochemistry assay (lines 252-259) the block of endogenous peroxidases is indicated but not the indication of the block to prevent non-specific antibody binding and reduce background and prevent false positive results using sera or a protein.Please, show it, if it was performed.Response: We appreciate the reviewer's comments.As reviewer suggested, the description of blocking non-specific antibody binding using serum has been added to the method.The indication of time is sometimes variable, either in minutes or in fractions (e.g.0.03) of the hour.To use only one modality is recommended.Response: We appreciate the reviewer's comments.As reviewer suggested, the indication of time has been revised into one modality.Why to produce an orthotopic tumor and metastases in the same animal if the aim of looking for anti-tumor therapy was already done?Generally, the orthotopic implant of tumor cells is used to study metastasis by following the spontaneous spread from the primary tumor (it takes time).The i.v.(in the tail veins -never cited in the text) injection of cells for lung colonization is a quicker simulation of the metastatic process (very used, even though biologically not overlap the natural process).Two pathologic conditions together may influence each other and increase animal suffering.What was the reason of this choice?It should be indicated.

Reviewer # 3 :
In this manuscript, Wang et al. developed a biomimetic nanovaccine with multivalent IL-15 self-transpresentation (MIST) using cytomembrane vesicles from dendritic cells infected by adenovirus expressing IL15 and IL15Ralpha, together with tumor antigens.They characterized the nanovaccine platform in size, in vivo distribution, biosafety, and most importantly, antitumor efficacy in multiple mouse tumor models.Overall, I think it is a nice study with well-designed experiments and impressive results, but a bit short of biological insights.I have a few questions about this manuscript: 1.By using dendritic cell membrane as the surrogate source of antigen-MHC complex to stimulate T cells has been reported previously by the same group and other groups, e.g., as in references 23 and 30.The authors may want to explicitly describe how this current study differ from the previous studies using similar strategy for T cell stimulation besides IL15 transpresentation.

Figure R2 .
Figure R2.The procedure for purification and preparation of cytomembrane vesicles and exosomes (Adv Sci.2021, 8(21), 2100460).The prepared cytomembrane vesicles are usually generated with the addition of ultrasonication to control their size distribution.Benefiting from the complete ultrasonic crushing of primary cells and following a centrifugal separation, cytomembrane vesicles can

3.
In the results description for tumor immune microenvironment analysis in Fig.4C, the authors suggested that MIST treatment converted M2 to M1 macrophages, but in Fig.5Fand S5, S9, the infiltration number of F4/80 + cells increased as well as CD8 + cells.F4/80 is generally considered a pan marker for macrophage, why would the MIST treatment increase the total number of tumor-infiltrating macrophages?
5, biNV-IL-15 treatment significantly elevated the intratumoral CCL2 level in the 4T1 tumor model, CT26 tumor model, and tumor resection model, leading to enhanced tumor infiltration of macrophages.

Figure R3 .
Figure R3.Immunohistochemical staining of tumors displaying CCL2 levels for PBS and biNV-IL-