Experimental Infection of Cattle with Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Virus (H5N1)

Four calves were experimentally inoculated with highly pathogenic avian influenza virus A/cat/Germany/R606/2006 (H5N1) isolated from a cat in 2006. All calves remained healthy, but several animals shed low amounts of virus, detected by inoculation of nasal swab fluid into embryonated chicken eggs and onto MDCK cells. All calves seroconverted.


The Study
In 2007, 6 Holstein-Friesian calves, 3 month of age, were obtained from a breeder near Greifswald-Insel Riems, Germany. Their infl uenza A virus-free status was confi rmed, and no avian infl uenza virus-specifi c genomes or antibodies were detected. All experiments were performed in the high-containment animal facility (Biosafety Level 3+) at the Friedrich-Loeffl er-Institut (trial approval no. LVLM-V/TSD/7221.3-1.1-003/07).
Four of the calves were intranasally inoculated with HPAIV (H5N1) strain A/cat/Germany/R606/2006, which had been isolated from a cat in 2006 (8,9). The virus was aerosolized in 5 mL cell culture medium containing 10 8.5 50% egg infectious dose/mL (third egg passage). The other 2 calves (contacts) were not inoculated but were housed in the same containment room for the duration of the experiment. For 7 days all calves were monitored by physical examination, and pharyngeal swabs were collected and examined for virus excretion.
All 6 calves remained healthy; no specifi c clinical signs were observed. All nasal swabs were tested with realtime reverse transcription-PCR specifi c for subtype H5N1 (10), and the genomic load was semiquantifi ed by using threshold cycle values. Infectious virus was detected by inoculation of swab fl uid into embryonated chicken eggs with 1 subsequent passage and onto MDCK cells (collection of cell lines in veterinary medicine, Friedrich-Loeffl er-Institut, Isle of Riems, RIE83).
Nasal swabs from all inoculated calves collected at 1 day postinoculation (dpi) were positive for viral RNA, and 3 of 4 calves shed infectious virus, detected by virus isolation in embryonated chicken eggs ( Table 1). Isolation of infectious virus in cell culture was successful in 2 of 4 samples. Furthermore, of 4 inoculated calves, 2 were positive for HPAIV (H5N1) genome copies at 2 dpi, and 1 shed infectious virus. From 3 dpi through 7 dpi, samples from nasal swabs of all animals were negative for viral genome, and all nasal swabs of the 2 contact calves remained negative for HPAIV (H5N1) RNA during the experiment ( Table 1).
Assuming that susceptible animals should mount an antibody response, we looked for antibodies against the highly conserved and immunogenic nucleoprotein (NP) of type A infl uenza viruses (11). Heat-inactivated (30 min at 56°C) serum samples collected at 0, 7, 14, 21, 28, and 91 dpi were tested for NP-specifi c antibodies with a licensed commercial ELISA (avian infl uenza A-blocking ELISA, Pourquier, Montpellier, France) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Serum samples from 50 HPAIV (H5N1)-negative, nonrelated cattle were used as controls and to confi rm the specifi city of the ELISA (data not shown).
To quantify the serologic response, we performed virus neutralization (VN) and hemagglutination inhibition (HI) tests with homotypic virus. The VN test was modifi ed according to a previously described procedure (12). In brief, bovine serum samples were heat inactivated for 30 min at 56°C, and 3-fold serial dilutions were performed in a 50-μL volume of cell culture medium in 96-well plates. The diluted serum samples were mixed with an equal volume of media containing homotypic infl uenza virus at a concentration  (14). All serum samples were treated with periodate and heat inactivated to eliminate serum inhibitors. The HI tests were performed with a starting dilution of 1:8 by using a 1% suspension of chicken erythrocytes in a 0.85% saline solution.
The commercial NP-specifi c ELISA detected infl uenza A virus-specifi c antibodies at 14 dpi in 2 of the 4 inoculated animals ( Table 2). All 4 animals had positive scores for neutralizing antibodies against the homologous virus at 14 dpi; specifi c titers ranged from 16 to 51. Furthermore, the HI test detected titers of 8 at 28 dpi in the 4 inoculated calves. At 21 dpi, VN testing indicated that 1 of the contact calves was positive for subtype H5N1-specifi c antibodies, NP-ELISA results for this calf were questionable, and HI testing did not detect any hemagglutinating antibodies. The other contact calf remained serologically negative throughout the experiment. Finally, 3 months after inoculation, VN test and ELISA clearly indicated seroconversion by all inoculated calves and 1 of the contact calves. In contrast, HI results were negative for all but 2 inoculated animals ( Table 2).

Conclusions
Our fi ndings show that HPAIV (H5N1) has the potential to infect bovine calves, at least after high-titer intranasal inoculation, and that conventional HI tests may underestimate such infections. Furthermore, asymptomatic shedding of HPAIV (H5N1) by infected calves and subsequent seroconversion seem to be possible, and even low levels of HPAIV (H5N1) might be suffi cient to induce a detectable antibody response in contact calves. However, the possibility that the infectivity detected in the contact  calf at 1 dpi was the result of residual inoculum cannot be ruled out. Although the question whether calf-to-calf transmission of HPAIV (H5N1) occurs could not be defi nitely answered by our study, bird-to-calf transmission resulting in seroconversion is probable. The incidence of clinical infections of cattle with HPAIV (H5N1) in disease-endemic regions should be low. However, our data indicate that serum from bovine species would be a valuable source of additional information about transmission events, especially in regions like Asia and Egypt, where HPAIV (H5N1) is endemic and probability of contact between poultry and cattle is high. The NP-ELISA is currently the assay of choice for the evaluation of bovine serum, and the VN test should be used for confi rmation.