Echinococcus multilocularis: An Emerging Pathogen in Hungary and Central Eastern Europe?

Echinococcus multilocularis, the causative agent of human alveolar echinococcosis, is reported for the first time in Red Foxes (Vulpes vulpes) in Hungary. This parasite may be spreading eastward because the population of foxes has increased because of human interventions, and this spread may result in the emergence of alveolar echinococcosis in Central Eastern Europe.

Echinococcus multilocularis, the causative agent of human alveolar echinococcosis, is reported for the first time in Red Foxes (Vulpes vulpes) in Hungary. This parasite may be spreading eastward because the population of foxes has increased as a consequence of human interventions, and this spread may result in the emergence of alveolar echinococcosis in Central Eastern Europe. E chinococcus multilocularis is the causative agent of alveolar echinococcosis in humans. The life cycle of this tapeworm is indirect and sylvatic; eggs shed by the definitive host, mainly the Red Fox (Vulpes vulpes) in Europe, develop to the metacestode stage in arvicolid rodents, which serve as intermediate hosts. In accidental cases, humans as aberrant intermediate hosts may also acquire E. multilocularis infection by egg ingestion. Although a rare disease in humans, alveolar echinococcosis is of considerable public health importance because it can be lethal in up to 100% of untreated patients (1). Treatment is still difficult, and therapy may cost $300,000 per patient (1).
The parasite has an extensive geographic distribution in the Northern Hemisphere, including parts of North America (Alaska, Canada, and some of the lower contiguous states of the United States), Asia (some of the newly independent states of the former Soviet Union, China, and Japan), and some European countries. Until the end of the 1980s, parasiteendemic areas in Europe were known to exist only in France, Switzerland, Germany, and Austria (2). In the 1990s and early 2000s, the infection rate of foxes increased drastically in some areas of France and Germany; several new endemic foci were detected in Switzerland, Germany, and Austria; and the parasite was reported from the surrounding countries, including The Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg, Poland, the Czech Republic, the Slovak Republic, and Italy (1,3,4). Here we report E. multilocularis infection from Red Foxes in the northern areas of Hungary and give a possible explanation for the spreading of the parasite from the west to the east.
Carcasses of Red Foxes sent to the Central Veterinary Institute, Budapest, from January to July 2002, in connection with the rabies immunization and control program, were included in this study. Carcasses were transported and stored in individual plastic bags at 4°C. The approximate delay between death and necropsy was 2 days. We examined the intestinal tracts by the sedimentation and counting technique as described (5). The whole sediment was examined in petri dishes under stereomicroscope at a magnification of X66, and worms were ascertained, counted, and subsequently washed and stored in 70% ethanol until DNA purification. Of 100 foxes (18 subadults and 82 adults) examined during the screening of the parasitologic status of the foxes in 15 counties in Hungary, 5 adults shot in April and May 2002 were found to be infected with 2, 3, 5, 6, and 254 mature worms of Echinococcus, respectively ( Figure 1).
The taxonomic status of the isolates was also confirmed by a diagnostic polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay. The five isolates were treated separately. Two different genes coding for U1 snRNA and the mitochondrial 12S rRNA genes have been used in diagnostic PCR for detecting E. multilocularis DNA (10-12); however, the species specificity of the PCR amplifying a fragment of the U1 snRNA gene could not be confirmed in a study (12). Thus, the nested PCR method described by Dinkel et al. (11) was used in our study. To exclude the possibility of contamination with specific DNA, a negative control was included and underwent the entire procedure starting with DNA extraction. DNA was purified as described (13). PCR reactions were performed by using a GeneAmp 2400 PCR system (Perkin Elmer, Foster City, CA). The conditions used for PCR were identical to those described (12). PCR products were detected on ethidium bromide-stained 1.5% agarose gels by visualizing them with UV light. PCR products of the expected size (373 bp and 250 bp) were amplified in all cases (Figure 2), confirming the results of the morphologic comparisons, i.e., E. multilocularis was responsible for all infections.
According to some authors (1,2), researchers cannot confirm whether E. multilocularis is spreading from historically known E. multilocularis-endemic foci (eastern France, southern Germany, northern Switzerland, and western Austria) to new regions, or whether the Central European E. multilocularis-endemic area is connected with the E. multilocularis-endemic area in Asia, and the tiny worms previously escaped the attention of parasitologists. Our findings may suggest that the parasite's range has recently expanded, rather than the first identification of formerly unknown E. multilocularis-endemic areas. The parasite was not identified previously in either Red Foxes or wild rodents in Hungary, despite the extensive studies conducted by Murai, Mészáros, Gubányi, and other parasitologists of the Natural History Museum, Budapest. Moreover, human cases have never been reported in Hungary. The photograph and the description of macroscopic lesions (two fist-sized, undulating cysts) in the only presumed report of alveolar echinococcosis written by two surgeons (14) clearly indicate that the case was indeed cystic echinococcosis.
The appearance of E. multilocularis in Hungary might be explained by changes in the size of the Red Fox population in Central and Central Eastern Europe. From the 1970s, a continuous increase in the size of the Red Fox population was observed in Switzerland and Germany, probably as a consequence of the initiation of the antirabies vaccination programs (2). The larger population led to a continuous migration of young foxes from territories with high population density toward those with lower density, i.e., partly eastward. This migration might have resulted in the appearance of foxes infected with E. multilocularis and the establishment of small disease-endemic foci in Poland and the Czech Republic. After the political changes of 1990, considerable changes in land use were observed in the former communist countries because of the disintegration of large state farms. The probable consequences of these changes, the decrease of annual hunting index resulting from a decrease in the price of fox fur, and the initiation of antirabies vaccination of foxes in Central Eastern European countries (Poland, the Czech Republic, the Slovak Republic, and Hungary), caused a corresponding increase in the fox population size (8,15), and probably the coincidental increase of E. multilocularis population and prevalence, and the expansion of E. multilocularis-endemic regions. A similar positive correlation between the population size of foxes and the prevalence of the parasite was also observed in Switzerland and Germany (2).
In the historically known E. multilocularis-endemic region, almost 400 patients are currently under continuous therapy, and the annual incidence of human alveolar echinococcosis has not varied markedly in the past few decades (1,2). In contrast with the stable epidemiologic situation in that region, the first 16 sufficiently documented and undoubtedly confirmed autochthonous human infections have been reported in Central Eastern European countries only from the late 1990s (2,9). Based on Central European annual incidence data (approximately 0.1-0.3/100,000 population) (2) and the similar overall prevalence of infection in foxes in Central and Central Eastern European countries (2,9), hundreds of cases would have been expected in the past few decades. The tiny worms may have escaped the attention of Central Eastern European parasitologists earlier. However, failing to recognize the characteristic and extensive lesions in humans in the past is unlikely.
Data from The Netherlands, Italy, Hokkaido Island and the surrounding islands of Japan, and North America provide clear evidence for the spreading and emergence of E. multilocularis infection (2,4,12). In the past, E. multilocularis has spread from the tundra zone of Northern Canada to the central regions of the continental United States (7) and from a small focus to the entire Hokkaido Island (2). Based on the above data, a similar spreading and emergence are likely being observed in Central Eastern European countries. As a result of their increasing population, foxes are inhabiting urban areas in several European countries, including Hungary (1,15). The appearance of foxes in a synanthropic environment may result in the infection of

OPPORTUNITIES FOR PEER REVIEWERS
The editors of Emerging Infectious Diseases seek to increase the roster of reviewers for manuscripts submitted by authors all over the world for publication in the journal. If you are interested in reviewing articles on emerging infectious disease topics, please email your name, address, curriculum vitae, and areas of expertise to eideditor@cdc.gov At Emerging Infectious Diseases, we always request reviewers' consent before sending manuscripts, limit review requests to three or four per year, and allow 2-4 weeks for completion of reviews. We consider reviewers invaluable in the process of selecting and publishing high-quality scientific articles and acknowledge their contributions in the journal once a year.
Even though it brings no financial compensation, participation in the peer-review process is not without rewards. Manuscript review provides scientists at all stages of their career opportunities for professional growth by familiarizing them with research trends and the latest work in the field of infectious diseases and by improving their own skills for presenting scientific information through constructive criticism of those of their peers. To view the spectrum of articles we publish, information for authors, and our extensive style guide, visit the journal web site at www.cdc.gov/eid.
For more information on participating in the peer-review process of Emerging Infectious Diseases, e-mail eideditor@cdc.gov or call the journal office at 404-371-5329.