Clonal differences among erythromycin-resistant Streptococcus pyogenes in Spain.

The aim of this study was to determine whether the high levels of erythromycin resistance in Streptococcus pyogenes found in Spain are due to the introduction and spread of one or more clones. Phenotypic and genotypic techniques were used to characterize all erythromycin-resistant S. pyogenes (ErR) isolated in Gipuzkoa, Spain, in the last 10 years and 128 ErR isolated in Vitoria and Madrid during 1996. Of 437 ErR, 97% had the M phenotype; all 283 of the strains studied had the mefA determinant of resistance. After biotyping, T serotyping, emm typing, and genotyping, four major clones were detected. Clones B (biotype I, type T4, emm4, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis [PFGE] II) and D (biotype V, type T8.25, emm75, PFGE IV) comprised 78.8% of all ErR. The resistance of S. pyogenes to erythromycin was mainly due to an efflux mechanism of resistance (M phenotype); few clones were responsible for it.

The aim of this study was to determine whether the high levels of erythromycin resistance in Streptococcus pyogenes found in Spain are due to the introduction and spread of one or more clones. Phenotypic and genotypic techniques were used to characterize all erythromycin-resistant S. pyogenes (ErR) isolated in Gipuzkoa, Spain, in the last 10 years and 128 ErR isolated in Vitoria and Madrid during 1996. Of 437 ErR, 97% had the M phenotype; all 283 of the strains studied had the mefA determinant of resistance. After biotyping, T serotyping, emm typing, and genotyping, four major clones were detected. Clones B (biotype I, type T4, emm4, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis [PFGE] II) and D (biotype V, type T8.25, emm75, PFGE IV) comprised 78.8% of all ErR. The resistance of S. pyogenes to erythromycin was mainly due to an efflux mechanism of resistance (M phenotype); few clones were responsible for it. Synopses agar, and commercial latex-agglutination techniques (Streptex, Wellcome, Dartford, UK, or Phadebact, Boule Diagnostics AB, Huddinge, Sweden). The confirmation of S. pyogenes and biotyping were done with a commercially available identification system: rapid ID 32 STREP (BioMerieux, La Balme-les-Grottes, France). Biotyping was performed according to Bouvet et al. (12).
All S. pyogenes were tested for susceptibility to erythromycin and other antibiotics by broth microdilution. ErR strains were restudied by agar dilution and by agar diffusion (erythromycin induction of resistance) to determine macrolide and lincosamine resistance phenotypes (11).
T-protein types were determined by slide agglutination of trypsin-digested suspensions of bacteria with rabbit type-specific antiserum (SEVAC, Prague) (13).
The emm gene type of T-serotyped strains was determined by polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), as described by Saunders et al. (14). Capture probes for the emm gene not described by Saunders et al. were selected from the DNA sequences encoding the N-terminal hypervariable region of strains of types emm2, emm9, emm48, and emm75 (GenBank accession nos. X56608, U12002, U11961, and U11993).
PFGE was done (15) with the following modifications. Cells were resuspended to an optical density (OD) 560nm = 1.0, and 4 ml of the adjusted suspension was centrifuged. Pelleted cells were resuspended in 200 µl of Pett IV buffer (10 mM Tris, pH 7.2, 20 mM NaCl, 50 mM EDTA) and mixed with 100 µl of 2% low-melting agarose; incubation of plugs with lysozyme solution (1 mg/ml) was reduced to 3 hours. Slices of plugs were digested at 50ºC for 16 hours with 30 UI of the enzyme SfiI since it has proven satisfactory in differentiating DNA fragments of S. pyogenes (15,16). Digested inserts were electrophoresed by using a CHEF-DR III apparatus (BioRad), along with DNA size standards (BioRad) under the following conditions: 22 hours with an initial switch time of 20 seconds, rising on linear ramp to 75 seconds at 6V/cm, with an included angle of 120ºC. Gels were stained with ethidium bromide and visualized under UV light with Imagestore 5000 ver.7.12 (Ultra-Violet Products Ltd, Cambridge, England). Similarities among PFGE patterns were established using the Dice coefficient and Lane-Manager 2.1 (TDI, Madrid, Spain) commercial computer software.
A clone was defined as a group of strains expressing both the same characteristic phenotype and genotype (PFGE pattern similarity ≥ 90%).
Among the ErR strains isolated in Gipuzkoa, two phenotypes of resistance were found: 8 (2.6%) strains showed the classic MLS b phenotype, while the other 301 (97.4%) strains expressed the M phenotype, as shown by susceptibility testing and confirmed by the presence of the mefA gene (11). Of the 128 ErR isolated in Madrid and Vitoria, 5 (3.9%) strains (all from Madrid) displayed the MLS b phenotype, while the remaining 123 (96.1%) showed the M phenotype. The presence of the mefA gene was searched for in 283 ErR with the M phenotype; it was detected in all.

Genetic Relationship of ErR and Erythromycin-Sensitive S. pyogenes
The genetic relationship of ErR and erythromycin-sensitive S. pyogenes with the same biotype and T serotype was analyzed by PFGE. In a sample of 360 erythromycinsensitive S. pyogenes, biotypes I and III were the most frequent (66.7%); T1 and T28 were the most frequent T serotypes (30.6%). Only 8 (2.2%) erythromycin-sensitive strains of biotype I, serotype T4 were found. None of the 19 T8.25 erythromycin-sensitive strains found were biotype V (18 biotype II, emm 75 and 1 biotype I, emm nontypeable). Infrequent biotype and T-serotype combinations among ErR, such as I/T1 and I/T28, were frequently found among erythromycin-sensitive strains. Similarities between PFGE patterns of most of the erythromycin-sensitive and -resistant strains with the same biotype and T-serotype combination was less than 75%. Exceptions to this were several III/T12, I/T1, and I/T28 erythromycin-sensitive strains that had a close similarity (>90%) with ErR of the same biotype and T-serotype combination.

Conclusions
In 1990, a new phenotype of erythromycin resistance (first designated NR and later M) was found in group A streptococci in Finland (7,17). ErR with the M phenotype had a low level of erythromycin resistance (8 mg/l to 16 mg/l) and showed cross-resistance with the 14-and 15-membered macrolides; however, they showed the same susceptibility to the 16-membered macrolides and to clindamycin as the erythromycin-susceptible strains (11). This M phenotype was prevalent among S. pyogenes in Europe and was the predominant phenotype of resistance among ErR isolated in Finland (18,19), Sweden (20), Austria (21), and Spain (9)(10)(11). In Italy, a high prevalence of erythromycin-resistant S. pyogenes was reported, but the prevalence of the M-phenotype strains among ErR varied by geographic area (22)(23)(24). Among the 437 ErR in our study in Spain, 424 (97%) showed the M phenotype; the mefA gene was detected and studied in 283 of these strains.
The epidemiologic surveillance of S. pyogenes can be done by using phenotypic or genotypic Synopses methods or both (as we did). Biotyping does not need specialized personnel or equipment, and it is useful, in combination with serotyping methods, for a first approximation of the epidemiologic characterization of S. pyogenes. In this study, the most prevalent T serotypes among ErR were infrequent among erythromycin-sensitive strains and vice versa. M serotyping is a classic typing method with at least 74 types recognized, but because it is a very specialized method and reagents are not available commercially, it is restricted to a few reference centers. A rapid PCR-ELISA to determine the emm gene type was an accessible alternative to serology for M-antigen typing.
Although the discriminatory power of biotyping and serotyping is considered poor because different genotypes may express the same phenotypic characteristics (15,25,26), these tests were of great value in our epidemiologic surveillance. The biotype and T-serotype combination was able to discriminate between ErR and erythromycin-sensitive strains and delimited most clones among ErR.
Genomic typing methods have rarely been used in characterizing the epidemiology of noninvasive S. pyogenes. Among these methods, restriction endonuclease analysis of genomic DNA (REA), random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD), ribotyping, PFGE of chromosomal DNA, and DNA sequence analysis have been used with varying degrees of success (15,16,19,(26)(27)(28). PFGE patterns confirmed the results of biotyping and serotyping and further distinguished among isolates within the same biotype and T-serotype combination. However, PFGE is a complex methodresults take at least 4 days to obtainand expensive equipment and specialized personnel are needed.
Although the polyclonal nature of the ErR strains was established in this study and previously (18), most ErR belonged to only a few clones. In Finland, 91% of the ErR isolated in 1994 were serotype T4 M4 and 88% constituted one clone by RAPD and REA (19). In our study, many clones were detected during the 10-year period. Two of the four main clones comprised 78.8% of ErR. The clonal distribution of ErR in Spain could be due to the introduction and spread of ErR from other locations or to mutations in S. pyogenes previously present in our environment. ErR with the M phenotype already existed in Gipuzkoa before 1990, and serotype T12 was the only one found. From 1980 to 1988, serotype T12 was predominant among ErR with the M phenotype in Sweden (20). In Gipuzkoa, the first serotype T4 ErR strain was isolated in 1991; until the end of 1994, 93.8% of ErR isolated belonged to the same clone (clone B: biotype I, type T4, emm4, PFGE II). Only three biotype I serotype T4 erythromycin-sensitive strains were detected before 1991. Clone B probably did not emerge in Gipuzkoa from a mutation of one of these uncommon sensitive strains. Apart from the strains described in Finland, Sweden, and Spain, strains with M phenotype were isolated in Great Britain before 1990 (4,29). Among these British and Finnish strains, type T4 M4 was frequently isolated (4,18,29). In a 1986 outbreak of 10 associated cases in Somerset, Great Britain, isolates were group A, type M4 and resistant to erythromycin (MIC 8 mg/l) but sensitive to clindamycin (29). We do not know whether the strains of clone B isolated in Spain are the same as the ErR type T4 M4 found in Great Britain and Finland before 1991, but it is probable. In Italy, serotypes T4 and T8.25 were found among M-phenotype strains (22), which suggests that a few clones have spread across Europe and caused a regional epidemic. No erythromycin-sensitive strains were detected in Gipuzkoa with the same biotype/T-type/emm type combination as clone D.
We believe that clones B and D, the most frequent among ErR in Spain, were of epidemic origin and that clone B probably came from northern or western Europe.
Dr. Perez-Trallero is a clinical microbiologist and infectious disease consultant. He is head of the Microbiology Department at Complejo Hospitalario Donostia and assistant professor of Preventive Medicine and Public Health at the Facultad de Medicina at the Basque Country University. His research focuses on antimicrobial resistance, epidemiology of transmissible diseases, and methods for their prevention and control.