Emerging viral diseases: an Australian perspective.

With a few exceptions, emerging diseases in Australia are similar to those in other industrialized countries (1-8). Most exceptions are either vector-borne or zoonotic viral diseases, the major focus of this update. The continuing emergence of antibiotic resistance is a worldwide problem. In Australia, antibiotic resistance is being reported from a growing number of organisms (9-15), often necessitating new case management practices and guidelines (16,17). Also, like other countries, Australia has had a number of foodborne (18-22) and waterborne (2325) epidemics in the past few years; the major difference is that the higher incidence of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli linked to outbreaks of hemolytic uremic syndrome is associated with serotype O111:Hrather than serotype O157:H-, which is more common in other countries. Major waterborne epidemics or contamination of reservoirs due to Cryptosporidium parvum have occurred over the past 3 years in the Eastern States of Australia (23-25), with the largest and most recent being a problem of contamination (in association with Giardia lamblia) in the Sydney water supply between July and September, 1998. However, despite this contamination, no increases in the number of cases of diarrheal disease were reported, perhaps because the inhabitants of Sydney were advised to boil the water before drinking it (25). The distribution and incidence of most of the recently described viral diseases (e.g., human herpesviruses 68 and hepatitis C and E viruses) in Australia are similar to those reported in other industrialized nations (3). Recent data for hepatitis G in selected Australian populations also support this contention (26).

With a few exceptions, emerging diseases in Australia are similar to those in other industrialized countries (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8). Most exceptions are either vector-borne or zoonotic viral diseases, the major focus of this update. The continuing emergence of antibiotic resistance is a worldwide problem. In Australia, antibiotic resistance is being reported from a growing number of organisms (9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15), often necessitating new case management practices and guidelines (16,17). Also, like other countries, Australia has had a number of foodborne (18)(19)(20)(21)(22) and waterborne (23)(24)(25) epidemics in the past few years; the major difference is that the higher incidence of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli linked to outbreaks of hemolytic uremic syndrome is associated with serotype O111:H-rather than serotype O157:H-, which is more common in other countries. Major waterborne epidemics or contamination of reservoirs due to Cryptosporidium parvum have occurred over the past 3 years in the Eastern States of Australia (23)(24)(25), with the largest and most recent being a problem of contamination (in association with Giardia lamblia) in the Sydney water supply between July and September, 1998. However, despite this contamination, no increases in the number of cases of diarrheal disease were reported, perhaps because the inhabitants of Sydney were advised to boil the water before drinking it (25).
The distribution and incidence of most of the recently described viral diseases (e.g., human herpesviruses 68 and hepatitis C and E viruses) in Australia are similar to those reported in other industrialized nations (3). Recent data for hepatitis G in selected Australian populations also support this contention (26).

Vector-Borne Viral Diseases
Australia has more than 70 arboviruses, but relatively few cause human disease (27,28). The most common arbovirus causing human disease is Ross River virus, an alphavirus, which causes an epidemic polyarthritis. Although Ross River virus incidence has increased over the past decade, the virus is not emerging; its increased incidence is probably due to increased awareness and recognition by general practitioners, improved diagnostic reagents, and increasing encroachment of human habitation into or near wetlands and other areas conducive to mosquito breeding. The only indigenous virus that can be called emerging is Barmah Forest virus, also an alphavirus and also the cause of an epidemic polyarthritis-like disease. Associated with human disease only since 1988 and increasing in incidence as diagnostic reagents have become available and clinicians have become aware of it, the virus has spread into new geographic areas, such as Western Australia (29,30). The two mosquito-borne diseases of particular concern, however, are importsJapanese encephalitis (JE) and dengue viruses.

Japanese Encephalitis Virus
The first outbreak of JE in the Australian region occurred in Torres Strait, northern Australia, in 1995 (31). Three cases (two of which were fatal) were reported from Badu Island in central Torres Strait, 2,000 km from the nearest Update focus of JE virus activity in Bali. Seroepidemiologic studies showed that the virus was relatively widespread in the central and northern islands with subclinical human cases on four islands and seropositive pigs on nine islands. Ten virus isolates were obtained during the outbreak: two from subclinical human infections (31) and eight from Culex annulirostris mosquitoes collected on Badu Island (32). Sequencing studies showed that these isolates (most closely related to a 1970 isolate from Kuala Lumpur and a 1981 isolate from Bali) (33) were almost identical, suggesting that the outbreak originated from a single source. These studies also showed that all isolates had the same 11 nucleotide deletion in the 3' untranslated region immediately downstream from the stop codon of the open reading frame (34), which provided a signature for comparing any future isolates. After the Badu Island outbreak, inactivated vaccine was offered to all the inhabitants of the northern and central Torres Strait islands (35). During 1996 and 1997, JE virus activity was detected through seroconversions in sentinel pigs on Saibai Island, which is in the north and only about 4 km from the Papua New Guinea coast (36) (J. Lee, D. Phillips, J. Hanna, unpub. results).
Seroepidemiologic studies found that virus activity has been widespread in Western Province, Papua New Guinea, since at least 1989, with seropositivity rates of 21% at that time among the Daru-speaking people. Results also showed that seropositivity rates were increasing in the Upper Fly River area and that the virus was spreading geographically (37 A second outbreak of JE occurred in Torres Strait in March 1998, with one human case from Badu Island and sentinel pigs seroconverting on a number of islands. Shortly afterwards, the first human case on mainland Australia was reported in a fisherman who acquired the infection near the mouth of the Mitchell River in southwest Cape York (38). Extensive seroepidemiologic investigations found no further human infections in communities on Cape York, but domestic pigs had seroconverted both near Mitchell River and near Bamega at the northerly tip of Cape York. Two virus isolations were obtained from pig sera collected near Bamega, and one isolate was obtained from a sentinel pig on Mabuiag JE virus activity in northern Australia began in 1998. Sentinel animal sites are being established to investigate whether the virus has become enzootic in the wildlife. Australia has both the mosquito vectors (Cx. annulirostris) and vertebrate hosts (ardeid birds and pigs) for the virus to become established. In addition, large areas of wetland habitats in Cape York would be conducive to virus enzootic cycles and would increase the potential for the virus to move south to more populous areas of Australia (39).

Dengue Viruses
Despite a 120-year history, dengue does not appear to be endemic in Australia. Several epidemics over the past decade have been initiated from virus introduced by viremic travelers (27,28,40). Imported cases of dengue in travelers are regularly diagnosed throughout Australia, with 30 to 60 cases reported annually, and growing in number. In most parts of Australia where the local mosquitoes are unable to transmit dengue viruses, these cases pose no risk, but in areas of north Queensland where Ae. aegypti is common and travel between Australia and countries in the Asian-Pacific area is frequent, local transmission and epidemic activity are major risks. The potential for local transmission of dengue viruses is confined to an area of Queensland corresponding to the geographic range of Ae. aegypti, extending from the islands of Torres Strait in the north, to Mount Isa and Boulia in the west, possibly to Roma in the south, and to Gladstone on the east coast (41). Despite this relatively broad geographic range, epidemic activity over the past 2 decades has been restricted from Torres Strait south to Cairns, Townsville, and Charters Towers. The major epidemics over the past 5 years have included a large outbreak of dengue type 2 in 1992 to 1993, principally in Townsville and Charters Towers with more than 2,000 cases, and with the first case of dengue hemorrhagic fever this century (42,43); an outbreak of dengue type 2 in 1996 to 1997 on a number of Torres Strait islands and Cairns, with more than 200 serologically confirmed cases (44,45); and an outbreak of dengue type 3 in 1997 to 1998 largely restricted to Cairns with 239 confirmed cases (46; S. Ritchie, S. Hills, pers. comm.) and also a few cases of dengue type 2. This latter outbreak also included a case of dengue hemorrhagic fever and the first case of dengue encephalopathy in Australia (J. Hanna, unpub. obs.). Nucleotide sequencing of dengue 2 isolates from Australia and a comparison with isolates from elsewhere in the Asian-Pacific region indicated that the 1992-93 isolates were most closely related to an Indonesian virus, whereas the 1996-97 isolates were most closely related to viruses originally isolated in Burkina Faso. This latter finding is of interest because a large outbreak of dengue type 2 occurred on a number of Pacific Islands before and during the Australian outbreak, but the South Pacific viruses were quite distinct from the Australian viruses (45).
After the 1992-93 outbreak, a Dengue Fever Management Plan was developed to reduce the potential for epidemic activity from imported cases. The plan has been extremely successful, and a number of imported cases have been recognized early and were contained before they could cause an epidemic (47,48). However, importation, either by continual movement of people between Papua New Guinea and Torres Strait or by movement of people for work, education, or recreation between Papua New Guinea and north Queensland, will always be a major route of entry of the virus.
Vector importations occur frequently, with a number of reports for both Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus (27), including two recent importations of Ae. albopictus into Townsville in 1997 (49) and Cairns in 1998 (S. Ritchie, pers. comm.).

Novel Zoonotic Viral Diseases
In the past 4 years, three newly described zoonotic viral diseases have been reported from Australia; two of these diseases are caused by the paramyxoviruses Menangle and Hendra (formerly equine morbillivirus), and the third is caused by Australian bat lyssavirus.

Menangle Virus
An apparently new virus in the family Paramyxoviridae was isolated from stillborn piglets with deformities at a large commercial piggery in New South Wales (51). The farrowing rate in the piggery decreased from an expected 82% to 60%; the number of live piglets declined in 27% of the litters born; the proportion of mummified and stillborn piglets, some with deformities, increased; and occasional abortions occurred. Virus was isolated from lung, brain, and heart tissues of infected piglets, and shown to be morphologically similar to viruses in the family Paramyxoviridae. No disease was seen in postnatal animals of any age, but a high proportion of sera (>90%) from animals of all ages contained high titers of neutralizing antibodies against the virus. Tests performed at the Australian Animal Health Laboratory confirmed that the virus, named Menangle virus, was unrelated to other known paramyxoviruses, including viruses known to infect pigs (51).
Serum from two workersone at the affected piggery and one at an associated piggery that had received weaned pigs from the original piggeryhad high titer, convalescent-phase Update neutralizing antibodies to the new virus. Both workers had an influenzalike illness with rash during the pig outbreak, but extensive serologic testing showed no evidence of any alternative cause; therefore, the illness is believed to have been caused by the new virus (52).
A large breeding colony of gray-headed and little red fruit bats roosted within 200 m of the affected piggery. In a preliminary study, 42 of 125 serum samples collected from fruit bats in New South Wales and Queensland had neutralizing antibodies to the new virus. In addition, antibodies were found in sera collected in 1996, before the outbreak, and from a colony of fruit bats 33 km from the piggery (51). Therefore, the fruit bats are believed to be the primary source of virus causing the outbreak. Sera collected from wild and domestic animals near the affected piggery were seronegative.
The geographic range, normal host species, and genetic relationship of this new virus to other paramyxoviruses remain unknown. Nevertheless, Menangle appears to cause fatal disease and malformations in prenatal pigs and may be associated with influenzalike illness in humans.

Hendra Virus
Hendra virus was first recognized in 1994 after an explosive outbreak of severe, fatal respiratory disease affecting race horses and humans. Twenty race horses in the Brisbane suburb of Hendra were infected; 13 died. The trainer and stable hand were also infected, and the trainer died (53)(54)(55). A second incident occurred in Mackay, a coastal town approximately 1,000 km north of Brisbane. Two horses and a farmer died, the latter from severe meningoencephalitis (56)(57)(58). The death of the horses and the initial infection of the farmer occurred in 1994 and preceded the Brisbane outbreak; the virus is believed to have then entered a latent phase for 1 year before reactivating to cause fatal encephalitis. No connection was found between the Brisbane and Mackay incidents (56). Experimental studies have shown that in horses and cats, after subcutaneous, intranasal, and oral administration, the virus causes fatal pneumonia (59). In guinea pigs, subcutaneous administration is also fatal, but the infection is more generalized. Black fruit bats (Pteropus alecto) infected by subcutaneous, intranasal, or oral routes contract a subclinical infection and generate an antibody response (M. Williamson, unpub. results). Endothelial cell tropism and formation of syncytia in blood vessels are common pathologic findings in both overt and subclinical infections (B.T. Eaton, M. Williamson, unpub. obs.).
Extensive seroepidemiologic studies found no evidence of Hendra virus among horses, other farm animals, or more than 40 species of wildlife in Queensland (56,60; P.L. Young, K. Halpin, H. Field, unpub. results). However, working on the hypothesis that if outbreaks at two distant sites were connected, the most likely wildlife source would be either birds or fruit bats, P.L. Young and colleagues subsequently showed that fruit bats (flying foxes), members of Megachiroptera, were the natural hosts on serologic grounds and by virus isolation, with widespread evidence of infection in four species of fruit bat: the black (Pteropus alecto), grey-headed (P. poliocephalus), little red (P. scapulatus), and spectacled (P. conspicillatus) fruit bats (61,62; P.L. Young et al., unpub. results). Indeed the virus was antigenically and genetically indistinguishable from the earlier horse and human isolates. Thus, it is now clearly established that Hendra virus is a fruit bat virus and is widely distributed throughout the range of pteropid bats in Australia, with serologic evidence of infection in an average of 42% of wild-caught bats, the number of seropositive animals varying with species (53% of 229 P. alecto, 47% of 195 P. poliocephalus, 12% of 115 P. scapulatus, and 41% of 99 P. conspicillatus) and age, but not with geographic distribution (H. Field, unpub. results). Serologic evidence of infection of fruit bats has also been reported from Papua New Guinea. Two species of antibody-positive bats (Dobsonia moluccense, P. neohibernicus) were identified from Madang on the north coast of Papua New Guinea

Update
Eaton and colleagues, unpub. results) and has revealed a gene order and P gene organization characteristic of members of the Paramyxovirus and Morbillivirus genera (65). Comparison of its deduced amino acid sequences with those of other family members confirm that Hendra virus is a member of the subfamily Paramyxovirinae, more closely related to members of the Paramyxovirus and Morbillivirus genera than the Rubulavirus genus. Overall, homology with other members of the subfamily is lower than that observed within an individual genus (L.F. Wang, B.T. Eaton, unpub. results). Hendra virus has several distinguishing features, including a genome that is 15% larger than that of other members, with each of the six transcription units containing a very long 3' untranslated region (L.F. Wang, B.T. Eaton, unpub. results). The P/ V/C gene has a fourth open reading frame located between those of the C and V proteins and potentially encoding a small basic protein similar to those of some members of the Rhabdoviridae and Filoviridae; its long 3' untranslated region is a common feature of the Filoviridae (65). The sequence of the N gene has also recently been described (66), and like the P/V/C gene, has a 3' untranslated region approximately tenfold longer than other members of the Paramyxovirinae. Although the deduced amino acid sequence of the N protein was slightly more homologous to members of the Morbillivirus genus than to those of other Paramyxovirinae genera, the level of identity was much lower than that observed within the Morbillivirus genus.
Three other findings differentiate Hendra from most other members of the Paramyxoviridae: the wide host range (59), the cleavage site of the F protein, and the orientation of the cell surface from which virus is released (B.T. Eaton, W. Michalski, and M. Williamson, unpub. results). An accumulating body of evidencesize of genome, comparative sequence analyses, coding capacity for a small basic protein in the P gene, morphologic features, host range, and various biologic properties, together with the wildlife host of the virussuggests that the virus had been misnamedit was neither an equine virus nor a morbillivirusalthough the name was relevant when the virus was first isolated. It has therefore been suggested that the virus be renamed Hendra and be classified in a new genus within the Paramyxovirinae (59,65,66). A number of aspects of the ecology of the virus remain to be determined. For instance, despite the obvious ubiquity of the virus in the fruit bat population and the extremely close relationship between bat caregivers and bats, there is no evidence of seroconversions among caregivers, despite their close contact with up to 1,000 bats per year (50). Specimens of persons who have died of either pneumonia or encephalitis of unknown etiology were virus-negative (C. Allan, J.S. Mackenzie, L.A. Selvey, unpub. results). Furthermore, all human infections appear to have been transmitted by horses. Thus, the virus appears to have low transmissibility to humans; it also appears to be linked with pregnancy: the index case of the Brisbane outbreak was a pregnant mare, a pregnant mare was involved in the Mackay incident, both incidents occurred during the birthing season of flying foxes, and virus was first recovered from uterine fluid of a pregnant animal (3). Thus, a number of questions remain about the ecologic, biologic, and pathologic characteristics of Hendra virus: 1) the infectivity and virulence of the virus and why it seems extremely difficult to transmit naturally between and within some susceptible host species, 2) classification of the virus, 3) role of pregnancy to transmission of the virus, 4) role of prior infection in horses in human infection, 5) method of transmission between fruit bats and from fruit bats to horses, 6) tropism of the virus, and 7) potential for producing a latent infection in humans.

Australian Bat Lyssavirus
Australia had been considered free of rabies and rabieslike viruses until 1996 when a new lyssavirus, closely related to classic rabies virus, was first identified in a fixed brain specimen from a young black flying fox (P. alecto), with unusual neurologic symptoms. Since this original isolation, a further 42 isolates have been obtained from all four species of fruit bat, with most isolates from black and little red (P. scapulatus) flying foxes, and four isolates from an insectivorous bat (Microchiroptera), the yellow-bellied sheathtail bat (Saccolaimus flavicentris) (P. Daniels, R. Lunt, unpub. results). The isolates were from as far apart as Melbourne and Darwin, but most were from Queensland. Antibodies to rabies virus (REFIT assay) have been detected in 2.6% of 345 bat nonrandom samples submitted to the Australian Animal Health Laboratory (P. Daniels, R. Lunt, Update unpub. results). Antibody has been detected in both infected and apparently healthy bats, but whether this reflects the ability of bats to recover from infection or become latently infected with the virus is not known.
Analysis using nucleocapsid-specific monoclonal antibodies showed a strong relationship between this new lyssavirus and serotype 1 rabies virus (67). Indeed, rabies vaccine may elicit a protective immune response in humans, indicating the antigenic similarity of Australian bat lyssavirus and classic rabies virus (P.K. Murray, pers. comm. to the Lyssavirus Expert Committee [68]). Phylogenetic studies of the N protein sequences indicated that the Australian virus was genetically distinct from classic rabies (genotype 1) and was, therefore, a previously unrecognized member of the Lyssavirus genus and represented a new genotype, genotype 7 (67).
Two human infections have been attributed to Australian bat lyssavirus. One fatal rabieslike infection was in a female bat caregiver from Rockhampton, Queensland (69,70). An isolate of Australian bat lyssavirus obtained post-mortem was antigenically and genetically similar to the virus from the insectivorous yellow-bellied sheathtail bat (A.R. Gould, R. Lunt, P. Daniels, unpub. results). A second death has recently been reported in Queensland (J. Hann, J. Faoagali, G. Smith, I Serafin, J. Northill, unpub. obs.). The infection was in a 27-year-old woman from Mackay, who died 2 years after a bat bite (by a large flying fox). Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing of RNA extracted from saliva and nuchal biopsy proved vital to the antemortem diagnosis. Immunofluorescence staining of postmortem samples confirmed the diagnosis. Preliminary sequencing of the amplicon has indicated that the virus is very similar to other lyssaviruses isolated from flying foxes but clearly distinct from a virus isolate from a yellow-bellied sheathtail bat (I. Serafin, G. Smith, J. Hanna, B. Harrower, J. Northill, A. Westcott, unpub. obs.). More extensive sequencing of the human and bat isolates is under way. Measures to prevent further human infection have been implemented (68,71).
As with Hendra virus, a number of questions remain about the ecology and biology of Australian bat lyssavirus. The finding of well, antibody-positive bats, which suggests that bats can either recover from infection or that they can be silently infected, needs to be investigated, particularly with respect to infectivity and possible transmissibility. More information is needed on the geographic and host range of the virus ecology within bat communities and risk for transmission to terrestrial animals.
These novel zoonotic viruses appear to have frugivorous bats as their natural vertebrate hosts. While little is known of the viral fauna of fruit bats (or indeed of most wildlife species) in Australia, the occurrence of these three zoonotic viruses from bats over 3 years suggests that further prospective studies of diseases of wildlife are warranted. Indeed, two paramyxoviruslike viruses unrelated to any other known paramyxoviruses (K. Halpin, P.L. Young, unpub. results) have recently been isolated from flying foxes.

Conclusions
The vector-borne and zoonotic diseases in this editorial encompass three patterns of emergence: known diseases increasing in incidence or geographic range (e.g., dengue and JE virus, respectively); new infectious agents as etiologic agents of known diseases (e.g., Australian bat lyssavirus as a cause of a rabieslike illness); and new infectious agents causing previously unrecognized diseases (e.g., Hendra virus). All three patterns demonstrate the need (and international responsibility) for ongoing surveillance and monitoring. In Australia, surveillance is the legislative responsibility of the individual states and territories. A Communicable Diseases Network Australia-New Zealand was established in 1989 to improve the control of communicable diseases in Australia by coordinating national surveillance activities and responses to outbreaks and by training public health staff. In 1996, Australia developed a National Communicable Diseases Surveillance Strategy to provide a national framework to monitor infectious diseases and plan and prioritize interventions. Components of the strategy include improvements to the national surveillance infrastructure, better monitoring of diseases and surveillance data, and better response to outbreaks. The strategy is being implemented and may provide the mechanism for a national response to new and reemerging diseases.