Responsive, Integrity, Morality and Fairness Law Enforcement as Social Change Instrument

This article reviews the essence of law enforcement as social change instrument. Law in the context of Indonesia that embrace democratic system is upholding the justice values in it that fairness principles for all Indonesian people. As positive law in a legal state, law enforcement is required to be professional, proportional, good, fair, and wisely so in accordance with the rules of expediency, kindness and equality in the law itself. The outcomes of the research indicate that law and community cannot be separated, for law the community is a resource that gives life (to nature) and move the law. The communities live the law with the values, ideas, concepts. And also contribute the community to implement the law.


INTRODUCTION
Law is a means of society, the human has always held interactions 1 Soerjono Soekanto, (1991). Fungsi Hukum dan Perubahan Sosial. 3th Edition. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti,p. 18 with each other, then the change is necessary. It can be used to make social change, i.e remove the obsolete habits that seen no longer appropriate, directing people to the desired destination, create to organize the life of society, but an interesting thing to study philosophically is the law always lags behind objects were arranged. Therefore, for the purpose of law can be achieved there should be changes in order to achieve a better and fair order.
In the constellation of the modern state, the law can be used as a tool of social engineering. 2 Roscoe Pound emphasized the significance of the law as a tool of social engineering, particularly through the mechanism of case handling by the judicial authorities that would generate jurisprudence. The social context of this theory is the people and the judiciary in the United States. In the context of Indonesia, the legal function, by Kusumaatmadja 3 interpreted as a tool of driving the society renewal. As a tool to encourage the renewal of society, its emphasis is 2 Roscoe Pound, (1978). Filsafat Hukum. Jakarta: Bhratara, p, 7; lihat juga Lili Rasjidi, (1992).
Dasar-dasar Filsafat Hukum. Bandung: Alumni, p. 43 3 Mochtar Kusumaatmadja. (1978). Fungsi Hukum Dalam Masyarakat Yang Sedang Membangun. Jakarta: p. 11 located to the formation of legislation by the legislature, which is intended to initiate the construction of a new society to be realized in the future through the enactment of legislation.  In Indonesia, the modern view of the role of law as a tool of development described by Kusumaatmadja by saying that the law has two functions, namely as a tool of public order (ensuring order and security) and a tool of social change. In connection with these roles, the law can be used as a tool for social change, namely the "law as a tool of social engineering". 14 The important sense of law role in this case 12 Satjipto Rahardjo, (1982 Instead a group of people who still see the role played by law in order to social change. The group sees the law as a driving force of ideas embodied by the law. In addition to the law has legality is also implementing agencies. Here, the law conducts change through the ability to perform "initial push". 22 Another group that rejected the role of law in social change is Savigny, a pioneer of history, said that the law is something that arises naturally from the social relatedness itself. The legislation as a way of making law is considered by them as unusual activity. Therefore, the law 21 Ibid. 22 The term of initial push is used by Arnold M. Rose. Arnold M. Rose as quoted by Soerjono Soekanto explained that there are 3 (three) general theories about social changes that lead to social change, namely: (1) progressive commutation than the discoveries in the field of technology; (2) contact or conflict between cultures; and (3) social movements. was actually only able to provide any attestation to the norms established formally by their own social life. 23 According to Satjipto Rahardjo, any proposed theories that argue against the use of law as a tool of social change consciously, but reality shows that the legislation is a state back to achieve wisdom. 24 Although it must be recognized that the process of achieving goals, through the law, will last long enough to effect raised. Here, the law is driving factor, which gives the first driver systematically. 25 A group of people who are still see a role that can be played by the law in the context of social change that essentially put the law as a motor that will spread and move the ideas to be realized by the law. In fact, a law creates a general condition, in which, the ideals of changes can be implemented. If thus, the role of law in social change seen in its ability to conduct an initial push to achieve the ideals set forth in the law. 26 23

Responsive and Progressive Law Enforcement
Responsive law December 2007, p. 18-19 In order to realize a responsive law, it required progressive law. On the basis, Satjipto Rahardjo offers a progressive law theory. Progressive law is a law manner that is based on a concern that is not end to encourage better law. The foundation of progressive law is human, not a legal matter. According to Satjipto, a man who became the foundation of law must be good and conscientious and worthy to be capital in building a progressive law. 35 In changing circumstances and to free themselves  is not absolute and bound to the rational, procedure structures in facing the concrete case, unless must manage conscience. In other words, the emphasis is on progressivity and partiality of judges over justice.

Integrity Law Enforcement
Integrity is not a word or term consideration the meaning of integrity in the dictionary, we will find that integrity is also a mission or common goal to develop and grow. Integrity is expected to lead to a common goal to achieve the aspired.
In connection with law enforcement, integrity is related to the integrity of law enforcement officials.  (1995). Etika Profesi Hukum (Norma-Norma Bagi Penegak Hukum). Yogyakarta, Penerbit Kanisius, p. 165. 44 Soerjono Soekanto. (2008). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum. Jakarta: Rajawali, p. 8 the technology is not a conscience, but rather a moral institution. 3. The law is an institution that aims leads man to life fair, prosperous, and makes people happy. 4. The progressive law is "the law pro-people and pro-justice". 5. The basic assumption of progressive law is for man, not vice versa. In this regard, the law does not exist for itself, but for something greater. 6. The law is always in the process to continue to be (as a process of law, law in the making). Therefore

Law Enforcement and Morality
Modern law according to Radbruch (1961:36)