Words Listening Related Electroencephalography Reactivity in Children of Preschool and Primary School Age

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

An analysis was made of event-related changes in the electroencephalogram (EEG) spectrum during the auditory perception of nouns in 83 typically developing children aged 4 to 10 years, including 50 children of preschool age and 33 children of primary school age. Following intergroup differences were revealed: in preschool children, neuronal systems are more involved in word processing, the activity of which is reflected in extensive desynchronization of alpha and synchronization of theta activity in the frontal zones of the left hemisphere. The EEG reactivity of primary school children is characterized by bilateral and more pronounced theta synchronization, which indicates an increased intensity of lexico-semantic operations, as well as a decrease in the background and an increase in the evoked theta activity. In children of this group, EEG synchronization in the beta range was also observed, represented by separate flashes and most pronounced in the frontal leads, which is typical for more mature speech processing mechanisms. The study results are important for clarifying the mechanisms of speech understanding in typically developing preschool and primary school age children.

About the authors

M. A. Nacharova

Vernadsky Crimean Federal University

Author for correspondence.
Email: alikina93@gmail.com
Russia, Simferopol

D. V. Nacharov

Sevastopol State University

Email: alikina93@gmail.com
Russia, Sevastopol

V. B. Pavlenko

Vernadsky Crimean Federal University

Email: alikina93@gmail.com
Russia, Simferopol

References

  1. Tincoff R, Jusczyk PW (2012) Six-month-olds comprehend words that refer to parts of the body. Infancy 17(4): 432–444. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7078.2011.00084.x
  2. Valleau MJ, Konishi H, Golinkoff RM, Hirsh-Pasek K, Arunachalam S (2018) An eye-tracking study of receptive verb knowledge in toddlers. J Speech Lang Hear Res 61(12): 2917–2933. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_JSLHR-L-17-0363
  3. Fernald A, Marchman VA (2012) Individual differences in lexical processing at 18 months predict vocabulary growth in typically developing and late-talking toddlers. Child Dev 83: 203–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01692.x
  4. Ference J, Curtin S (2015) The ability to map differentially stressed labels to objects predicts language development at 24 months in 12-month-olds at high risk for autism. Infancy 20: 242–262. https://doi.org/10.1111/infa.12074
  5. Schneider JM, Abel AD, Ogiela DA, McCord C, Maguire MJ (2018) Developmental differences in the neural oscillations underlying auditory sentence processing in children and adults. Brain Lang 186: 17–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2018.09.002
  6. Panda EJ, Emami Z, Valiante TA, Pang EW (2021) EEG phase synchronization during semantic unification relates to individual differences in children’s vocabulary skill. Dev Sci 24(1): e12984. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12984
  7. Maguire MJ, Schneider JM, Melamed TC, Ralph YK, Poudel S, Raval VM, Mikhail D, Abel AD (2022) Temporal and topographical changes in theta power between middle childhood and adolescence during sentence comprehension. Dev Cogn Neurosci 53: 101056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2021.101056
  8. Nunez PL, Srinivasan R (2006) Electric fields of the brain: the neurophysics of EEG. Oxford Univer Press. New York.
  9. Schneider J, Maguire M (2018) Developmental differences in the neural correlates supporting semantics and syntax during sentence processing. Dev Sci 22(4): e12782. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12782
  10. Bastiaansen M, Hagoort P (2015) Frequency-based segregation of syntactic and semantic unification during online sentence level language comprehension. J Cogn Neurosci 27(11): 2095–2107. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00829
  11. Bastiaansen M, Van der Linden M, ter Keurs M, Dijkstra T, Hagoort P (2005) Theta responses are involved in lexico-semantic retrieval during language processing. J Cogn Neurosci 17: 530–541. https://doi.org/10.1162/0898929053279469
  12. Lam NHI, Schoffelen JM, Uddén J, Hultén A, Hagoort P (2016) Neural activity during sentence processing as reflected in theta, alpha, beta, and gamma oscillations. NeuroImage 142: 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.03.007
  13. Klimesch W, Doppelmayr M, Wimmer H, Schwaiger J, Röhm D, Gruber W, Hutzler F (2001) Theta band power changes in normal and dyslexic children. Clin Neurophysiol 112(7): 1174–1185. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2457(01)00545-4
  14. Spironelli C, Angrilli A (2010) Developmental aspects of language lateralization in delta, theta, alpha and beta EEG bands. Biol Psychol 85(2): 258–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2010.07.011
  15. Wang L, Bastiaansen M (2014) Oscillatory brain dynamics associated with the automatic processing of emotion in words. Brain and Language 137: 120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2014.07.011
  16. Saltuklaroglu T, Bowers A, Harkrider AW, Casenhiser D, Reilly KJ, Jenson DE, Thornton D (2018) EEG mu rhythms: rich sources of sensorimotor information in speech processing. Brain and Language 187: 141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2018.09.005
  17. Thornton D, Harkrider AW, Jenson D, Saltuklaroglu T (2018) Sensorimotor activity measured via oscillations of EEG mu rhythms in speech and non-speech discrimination tasks with and without segmentation demands. Brain Lang 187: 62–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2017.03.011
  18. Belalov VV, Bazanova OM, Mikhailova AA, Dyagileva YuO, Pavlenko VB (2020) EEG mu rhythm reactivity during speech perception in children aged from two to three years: influence of rearing conditions. IP Pavlov J Higher Nervous Activity 70(2): 193–205. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044467720020045
  19. Lewis AG, Wang L, Bastiaansen M (2015) Fast oscillatory dynamics during language comprehension: Unification versus maintenance and prediction? Brain Lang 148: 51–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2015.01.003
  20. Lewis AG, Schoffelen JM, Schriefers H, Bastiaansen M (2016) A predictive coding perspective on beta oscillations during sentence-level language comprehension. Front Hum Neurosci 10: 85. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00085
  21. Schneider JM, Abel AD, Momsen J, Melamed TC, Maguire MJ (2021) Neural oscillations reveal differences in the process of word learning among school-aged children from lower socioeconomic status backgrounds. Neurobiol Lang (Camb) 2(3): 372. https://doi.org/10.1162/nol_a_00040
  22. Степаненко ДГ, Сагутдинова ЭШ (2010) О классификациях нарушения речи в детском возрасте. Клин мед 2: 32–43. [Stepanenko DG, Sagutdinova ESh (2010) About speech/ language disorders classifications in childhood. Klin Med 2: 32–43. (In Russ)].
  23. Jiang Z, Waters AC, Liu Y, Li W, Yang Y (2017) Event-related theta oscillatory substrates for facilitation and interference effects of negative emotion on children’s cognition. Int J Psychophysiol 116: 26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2017.02.012
  24. Craig AR, Fisher WW (2019) Randomization tests as alternative analysis methods for behavior-analytic data. J Exp Anal Behav 111(2): 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.500
  25. Maris E, Oostenveld R (2007) Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data. J Neurosci Methods 164(1): 177–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.03.024
  26. Brauer J, Friederici AD (2007) Functional neural networks of semantic and syntactic processes in the developing brain. J Cogn Neurosci 19(10): 1609–1623. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2007.19.10.1609
  27. Friederici AD, Brauer J, Lohmann G (2011) Maturation of the language network: from inter-to intrahemispheric connectivities. PLoS One 6(6): e20726. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020726
  28. Holland SK, Vannest J, Mecoli M, Jacola LM, Tillema JM, Karunanayaka P, Schmithorst VJ, Yuan W, Plante E, Byars AW (2007) Functional MRI of language lateralization during development in children. Int J Audiol 46(9): 533–551. https://doi.org/10.1080/14992020701448994
  29. Walenski M, Europa E, Caplan D, Thompson CK (2019) Neural networks for sentence comprehension and production: An ALE-based meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. Human Brain Mapping 40(8): 2275. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24523
  30. Stroganova TA, Komarov KS, Goiaeva DE, Obukhova TS, Ovsiannikova TM, Prokofyev AO, Orekhova EV (2021) The effect of periodicity and “vowelness” of a sound on cortical auditory responses in children. IP Pavlov J Higher Nervous Activity 71(4): 563–577. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-022-01253-z
  31. Stankova EP, Guillemard DM, Galperina EI (2020) Morpho-functional basis of complex sentence processing in adults and children. Human Physiol 46(3): 332–342. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0362119720030135
  32. Klimesch W (1999) EEG alpha and theta oscillations reflect cognitive and memory performance: a review and analysis. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 29(2-3): 169–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-0173(98)00056-3
  33. Cellier D, Riddle J, Petersen I, Hwang K (2021) The development of theta and alpha neural oscillations from ages 3 to 24 years. Dev Cogn Neurosci 50: 100969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2021.100969
  34. Meng X, Sun C, Du B, Liu L, Zhang Y, Dong Q, Georgiou GK, Nan Y (2022) The development of brain rhythms at rest and its impact on vocabulary acquisition. Dev Sci 25(2): e13157. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.13157
  35. Oliveira DS, Saltuklaroglu T, Thornton D, Jenson D, Harkrider AW, Rafferty MB, Casenhiser DM (2021). Mu rhythm dynamics suggest automatic activation of motor and premotor brain regions during speech processing. J Neurolinguist 60: 101006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2021.101006
  36. Sauseng P, Klimesch W, Doppelmayr M, Pecherstorfer T, Freunberger R, Hanslmayr S (2005) EEG alpha synchronization and functional coupling during top-down processing in a working memory task. Hum Brain Mapp 26(2): 148–155. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20150
  37. Smalle EH, Rogers J, Mottonen R (2015) Dissociating Contributions of the Motor Cortex to Speech Perception and Response Bias by Using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation. Cereb Cortex 25(10): 3690–3698. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhu218
  38. Liebenthal E, Möttönen R (2018) An interactive model of auditory-motor speech perception. Brain Lang 187: 33–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2017.12.004
  39. Knyazev GG (2022) Coding the meaning in brain activity. IP Pavlov J Higher Nervous Activity 72(6): 800–825. https://doi.org/10.31857/S004446772206003X
  40. Arévalo AL, Baldo JV, Dronkers NF (2012) What do brain lesions tell the human mirror neuron system and us about theories of embodied semantics? Cortex 48(2): 242–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2010.06.001
  41. Spitzer B, Haegens S (2017) Beyond the Status Quo: A Role for Beta Oscillations in Endogenous Content (Re)Activation. eNeuro 4(4): ENEURO.0170–17.2017. https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0170-17.2017

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download
2.

Download (1MB)
Indexing metadata
3.

Download (1MB)
Indexing metadata

Copyright (c) 2023 М.А. Начарова, Д.В. Начаров, В.Б. Павленко

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies