Abstract
The novel, additive manufacturing technique, continuous lattice fabrication, combines the advantages of continuous fiber-reinforcement with those of additive manufacturing. This enables the generation of fiber-reinforcement within a single layer and especially along an out-of-plane load path inside all spatial dimensions. This study is a test-related evaluation of sandwich panels with lattice core structures modifying a compression test. The specimens were manufactured differentially via plug and bond and automatically using continuous lattice fabrication. Additionally, the spatial arrangement of the rods within the lattice core structure varied in terms of base area. The ultra-lightweight sandwich panels have lattice core structures with core densities < 10 mg × cm−3. The material testing was performed by a modified compression test at room temperature. The damage analysis of the single rods shows current deficits and future potentials for optimization of lattice core structures. It could be shown that sandwich panels exhibit a compression strength of up to 0.30 MPa at a core density of 6.57 mg × cm−3. Using a dimensionless lightweight index demonstrates a mechanical performance on a level comparable with that of selected core materials.
Kurzfassung
Das neuartige Verfahren Continuous Lattice Fabrication kombiniert die Vorteile einer kontinuierlichen Faserverstärkung und der additiven Fertigung. Dabei kann die Faserverstärkung nicht nur innerhalb einzelner Schichten, sondern auch kraftflussgerecht (out-of-plane) im dreidimensionalen Raum generiert werden. Ziel dieses Beitrags ist eine testbasierte Bewertung von Sandwichstrukturen mit fachwerkähnlichen Kernstrukturen durch die Modifikation eines Druckversuchs. Dafür wurden Proben differentiell mit Steck- und Klebeverbindungen sowie automatisch mittels continuous lattice fabrication gefertigt. Zusätzlich wurde die räumliche Anordnung der Fachwerkstäbe, durch verschiedene Grundflächen und Stabwinkel, variiert. Ultraleichtbau-Strukturen mit fachwerkähnlichen Kernstrukturen haben Kerndichten kleiner 10 mg × cm−3. Die grundlegende werkstoffmechanische Untersuchung wurde mit Hilfe eines modifizierten einachsigen Druckversuchs bei Raumtemperatur durchgeführt. Die erarbeitete Systematik zur Schadensanalyse legt zukünftiges Optimierungspotential des noch jungen Verfahrens offen. Es konnte gezeigt werden, dass die Sandwichelemente mit einer Kernstrukturdichte von 6.57 mg × cm−3 eine Druckfestigkeit von bis zu 0.30 MPa aufweisen. Durch Auswertung einer dimensionslosen Leichtbaukennzahl konnte gezeigt werden, dass die Kennwerte der entwickelten Strukturen auf einem ähnlichen Niveau mit ausgewählten technischen Kernmaterialien liegen.
References
1 A.Bellini, S.Güceri: Mechanical characterization of parts fabricated using fused deposition modeling, Rapid Prototyping Journal9 (2003), No. 4, pp. 252–26410.1108/13552540310489631Search in Google Scholar
2 A. R.Torrado, D. A.Roberson: Failure analysis and anisotropy evaluation of 3D-printed tensile test specimens of different geometries and print raster patterns, Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention16 (2016), No. 1, pp. 154–16410.1007/s11668-016-0067-4Search in Google Scholar
3 A. M.Forster: Materials testing standards for additive manufacturing of polymer materials: State of the art and standards applicability, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, USA (2015), pp. 1–4510.6028/NIST.IR.8059Search in Google Scholar
4 O.Huber, H.Klaus: Cellular composites in lightweight sandwich applications, Materials Letter63 (2009), No. 13–14, pp. 1117–112010.1016/j.matlet.2008.11.059Search in Google Scholar
5 X.Zheng, H.Lee, T. H.Weisgraber, M.Shusteff, J.DeOtte, E. B.Duoss, J. D.Kuntz, M. M.Biener, Q.Ge, J. A.Jackson, S. O.Kucheyev, N. X.Fang, C. M.Spadaccini: Ultralight, ultrastiff mechanical metamaterials, Science344 (2014), No. 6190, pp. 1373–137710.1126/science.1252291Search in Google Scholar
6 M.Eichenhofer, J. C. H.Wong, P.Ermanni: Continuous lattice fabrication of ultra-lightweight composite structures, Elsevier Additive Manufacturing18 (2017), pp. 48–5710.1016/j.addma.2017.08.013Search in Google Scholar
7 F.Eichenhofer, M.Eichenhofer: Method for producing a framework, Germany (2015), Patent number: WO2015169414A1, pp. 1–39Search in Google Scholar
8 M.Eichenhofer, J. I.Maldonado, F.Klunker, P.Ermanni: Analysis of processing conditions for a novel 3D-composite production technique, Proc. 20th International Conference on Composite Materials ICCM20, Copenhagen (2015), pp. 1–12Search in Google Scholar
9 D. L.DuQuesnay, T. H.Topper, M. T.Yu: The effect of notch radius on the fatigue notch factor and the propagation of short cracks, Mechanical Engineering (1986), pp. 323–335Search in Google Scholar
10 H.Fan, W.Yang, B.Wang, Y.Yan, Q.Fu, D.Fang, Z.Zhuang: Design and manufacturing of a composite lattice structure reinforced by continuous carbon fibers, Elsevier Tsinghua Science & Technology11 (2005), No. 5, pp. 515–52210.1016/S1007-0214(06)70228-0Search in Google Scholar
11 C.Schneider, M. N.Velea, S.Kazemahvazi, D.Zenkert: Compression properties of novel thermoplastic carbon fibre and poly-ethylene terephthalate fibre composite lattice structures, Elsevier Materials & Design65 (2015), pp. 1110–112010.1016/j.matdes.2014.08.032Search in Google Scholar
12 C. R.Schultheisz, A. M.Waas: Compressive failure of composites, Part I: Testing and micromechanical theories, Elsevier Aerospace Science32 (1996), No. 1, pp. 1–4210.1016/0376-0421(94)00002-3Search in Google Scholar
13 N. A.Fleck, D.Liu: Microbuckle initiation from a patch of large amplitude fibre waviness in a composite under compression and bending, Elsevier European Journal of Mechanics – A/Solids20 (2001), No. 1, pp. 23–3710.1016/S0997-7538(00)01124-4Search in Google Scholar
14 Y.Verreman, N.Limodin: Fatigue notch factor and short crack propagation, Elsevier Engineering Fracture Mechanics75 (2008), No. 6, pp. 1320–133510.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.07.005Search in Google Scholar
15 B.Klein: Leichtbau-Konstruktion, 10th Ed., Springer Vieweg, Wiesbaden, Germany (2013), pp. 23–3710.1007/978-3-658-02272-3Search in Google Scholar
16 Plascore Inc: PN2 Aerospace Grade Aramid Fiber Honeycomb, Zeeland, USA (2017)Search in Google Scholar
17 Evonik Resource Efficiency GmbH: Technical information: ROHACELL® A, Darmstadt, Germany (2017)Search in Google Scholar
18 AirexAG: Data Sheet AIREX® R82, Sins, Switzerland (2011)Search in Google Scholar
19 AirexAG: Data Sheet AIREX® C70, Sins, Switzerland (2011)Search in Google Scholar
20 AirexAG: Data Sheet BALTEK® SB, Sins; Switzerland (2016)Search in Google Scholar
21 Evonik Resource Efficiency GmbH: Technical information ROHACELL® S, Darmstadt, Germany (2017)Search in Google Scholar
© 2018, Carl Hanser Verlag, München