Abstract
Warpage reduction, dimensional tolerance accomplishment and time and cost saving are some of the most important problems in the injection molding production process. In this study, a real case of a thermoplastic injected part is analyzed. The mold for a pipeline connecting element has been designed, according to known technical and economical criterion to fulfill customer requirements. Particularly for this element, warpage of a specified surface and two diameter sizes are fundamental for correct part functionality and assembling. The analysis is centered on the effects of four process parameters, i. e. packing pressure, packing time, melt temperature and cooling time that heavily influence final results. A finite element model has been used to evaluate their effects on four important final objectives that are the geometrical entities and production cycle time. Each variable has been varied into its proper range, in accordance with a central composite design DoE plan; 25 simulations have been executed and results have been represented using response surfaces. Pareto Front for above listed objectives has been extracted using a genetic algorithm and the best set of parameters has been determined after application of specific selection criteria and a weighted objective function. After numerical evaluation, the CCD DoE plan has been experimentally repeated. Results have been measured on real components, and then represented with response surfaces as well. The same algorithm and objective function have been used for optimization, to determine the experimental optimum parameter set. Finally, the two parameter sets have been compared.
References
Cracknell, P. S., Dison, R. W.: Handbook of Thermoplastic Injection Mould Design, Blackie Academic & Professionals, London (1993), PMid:8509090 PMCid:1195042Search in Google Scholar
Deb, K., “Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm, Problem Difficulties and Construction of Test Problems” Evol. Comput., 7, 205–230 (1999), http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/evco.1999.7.3.205, PMid:10491463Search in Google Scholar
Deb, K.: Multi-Objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms, Wiley & Sons, New York (2000)Search in Google Scholar
Fisher, J. M.: Handbook of Molded Part Shrinkage and Warpage, Plastic Design Library, William Andrew Publishing, New York (2003)10.1016/B978-188420772-3.50004-3Search in Google Scholar
Huang, M. C., Tai, C. C., “The Effective Factors in the Warpage Problem of an Injection-molded Part With a Thin Shell Feature” J. Mater. Process. Tech., 110, 1–9 (2001), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(00)00649-XSearch in Google Scholar
Kurtaran, H., Erzurumlu, T., “Efficient Warpage Optimization of Thin Shell Plastic Parts Using Response Surface Methodology and Genetic Algorithm” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Tech., 27, 468–472 (2006), http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00170-004-2321-2Search in Google Scholar
Montgomery, D. C.: Design and Analysis of Experiments, Wiley & Sons, New York (2001)Search in Google Scholar
Moore, E. P.: Polypropylene Handbook, Hanser Publisher, Munich (1996)Search in Google Scholar
Ozcelik, B., Erzurumlu, T., “Determination of Effecting Dimensional Parameters on Warpage of Thin Shell Plastic Parts Using Integrated Response Surface Method and Genetic Algorithm” Int. Commun. Heat. Mass., 32, 1085–1094 (2005), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2004.10.032Search in Google Scholar
Ozcelik, B., Erzurumlu, T., “Comparison of the Warpage Optimization in the Plastic Injection Molding Using ANOVA, Neural Network Model and Genetic Algorithm” J. Mater. Process. Tech., 171, 437–445 (2006), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.04.120Search in Google Scholar
Shi, H., Wang, X., and Xie, S., “A Warpage Optimization Method for Injection Molding Using Artificial Neural Network Combined Weighted Expected Improvement” Int. Polym. Proc., 27, 341–347 (2012), http://dx.doi.org/10.3139/217.2542Search in Google Scholar
Tang, S. H., et al., “The Use of Taguchi Method in the Design of Plastic Injection Mould for Reducing Warpage” J. Mater. Process. Tech., 182, 418–426 (2007), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.08.025Search in Google Scholar
© 2013, Carl Hanser Verlag, München
