PS1-62: Assessing Readiness for Team Care in Community-based Clinics: Barriers and Facilitators to Implementing an Evidence-based Intervention to Improve BP Control

  1. Laura-Mae Baldwin1
  1. 1University of Washington
  2. 2Group Health Cooperative
  3. 3Battelle Centers for Public Health Research and Evaluation
  4. 4Idaho State University

Abstract

Background/Aims Understanding the barriers and facilitators to implementing evidence-based models of care in typical community settings is critical to the successful translation of research-tested interventions into practice. The Electronic Communications and Home Blood Pressure Monitoring trial (e-BP), implemented in a large, integrated group practice, demonstrated that team-care and incorporating a pharmacist to manage hypertension via secure e-mail communications in an existing patient-shared electronic health record (EHR) resulted in almost twice the rate of BP control compared to usual care. We sought to assess whether e-BP could be implemented in community-based primary care clinics with very different contextual features (e.g. inexperience with pharmacist team members, limited IT infrastructure, and vulnerable patient populations).

Methods We conducted interviews with purposive samples of health care providers, pharmacists and patients associated with four community-based, primary care clinics. Using template analysis incorporating a priori codes drawn from the Chronic Care Model and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, we identified themes illuminating contextual barriers and facilitators, as well as strategies for adapting core components of e-BP for implementation to control hypertension in community practice settings.

Results Community-based patients, pharmacists, providers and staff expressed eagerness to participate in an intervention like e-BP. They characterized its approach to healthcare as “the right thing to do” and expressed hope that participation would yield enough evidence about the benefits of this care model to support significant reimbursement reform. The intervention’s sustainability was of paramount importance to stakeholders and needs to be considered in planning for implementation. Stakeholders were more concerned about being able to overcome barriers related to regulations and reimbursement than to clinic-level factors.

Discussion Community-based clinic stakeholders would like to improve hypertension control and the care of other chronic conditions using team care and communications outside of office visits. However, ensuring a business case for implementation and sustainability of these models was a persistent theme. Using this case study, we will discuss methods and models for adaptation and implementation of evidence-based interventions into community practice.

| Table of Contents