Performance evaluation of an insurance company using an integrated Balanced Scorecard (BSC) and Best-Worst Method (BWM)

Authors

  • Rishi Dwivedi Department of Finance, Xavier Institute of Social Service, Ranchi, India
  • Kanika Prasad Department of Production and Industrial Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Jamshedpur, India
  • Nabankur Mandal Department of Mechanical Engineering, MCKV Institute of Engineering, West Bengal, India
  • Shweta Singh Department of Finance, Xavier Institute of Social Service, Ranchi, India
  • Mayank Vardhan Department of Finance, Xavier Institute of Social Service, Ranchi, India
  • Dragan Pamucar Department of Logistics, Military academy, University of Defence in Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame2104033d

Keywords:

Service sector, Insurance industry, BSC model, Best-Worst Method, BWM, Performance evaluation

Abstract

Recent economy and financial business environment is undergoing quick and accelerating revolution and paradigm shift, resulting in growing uncertainty and complexity. Therefore, the need for an all-inclusive and far-reaching performance measurement model is universally felt as it can provide management-oriented information and act as a supporting tool in developing, inspecting and interpreting policy-making strategies of an enterprise to achieve competitive advantages. Hence, this paper proposes an application of balanced scorecard (BSC) model in an insurance organization for coordinating and regulating its corporate vision, mission and strategy with organizational performance through the interrelation of different layers of business perspectives. In the next stage, a framework to unify both BSC and best-worst method (BWM) models is implemented for the very first time in insurance domain to assess its performance over two-time periods. The integrated BSC-BWM model can help managers and decision-makers to figure out and interpret competing strength of the said enterprise and consecutively expedite in efficient and compelling decision making. Nevertheless, this integrated model is embraced and selected for a certain categorical business and there is enough future scope of its application to distinct industries.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdelghany, M., & Abdel-Monem, M. (2019). Balanced scorecard model for water utilities in Egypt. Water Practice and Technology, 14(1), 203-216.

Ahmadi, H. B., Kusi-Sarpong, S., & Rezaei, J. (2017). Assessing the social sustainability of supply chains using Best Worst Method. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 126, 99-106.

Andjelkovic Pesic, M., & Dahlgaard, J. J. (2013). Using the Balanced Scorecard and the European Foundation for Quality Management Excellence model as a combined roadmap for diagnosing and attaining excellence. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 24(5-6), 652-663.

Anjomshoae, A., Hassan, A., Kunz, N., Wong, K. Y., & de Leeuw, S. (2017). Toward a dynamic balanced scorecard model for humanitarian relief organizations’ performance management. Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management, 7(2), 194-218.

Badi, I., Shetwan, A., & Hemeda, A. (2019). A grey-based assessment model to evaluate health-care waste treatment alternatives in Libya. Operational Research in Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications, 2(3), 92-106.

Bozanic, D., Tešić, D., & Milić, A. (2020). Multicriteria decision making model with Z-numbers based on FUCOM and MABAC model. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 3(2), 19-36.

Brunelli, M., & Rezaei, J. (2019). A multiplicative best-worst method for multi-criteria decision making. Operations Research Letters, 47(1), 12-15.

Chen, F. H., Hsu, T. S., & Tzeng, G. H. (2011). A balanced scorecard approach to establish a performance evaluation and relationship model for hot spring hotels based on a hybrid MCDM model combining DEMATEL and ANP. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 30(4), 908-932.

Dwivedi, R., & Chakraborty, S. (2016). Development of a strategic management tool in a thermal power plant using ABC and BSC models. Serbian Journal of Management, 11(1), 81-97.

Dwivedi, R., Chakraborty, S., Sinha, A. K., & Singh, S. (2018). Development of a performance measurement tool for an agricultural enterprise using BSC and QFD models. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 377, No. 1, p. 012214). IOP Publishing.

Gupta, H. (2018). Evaluating service quality of airline industry using hybrid best worst method and VIKOR. Journal of Air Transport Management, 68, 35-47.

Hakkak, M., & Ghodsi, M. (2015). Development of a sustainable competitive advantage model based on balanced scorecard. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 5(5), 298-308.

Kaplan, R. S. (1994). Devising a balanced scorecard matched to business strategy. Planning Review, 22(5), 15-48.

Kheybari, S., Kazemi, M., & Rezaei, J. (2019). Bioethanol facility location selection using best-worst method. Applied energy, 242, 612-623.

Kushwaha, D. K., Panchal, D., & Sachdeva, A. (2020). Risk analysis of cutting system under intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Reports in Mechanical Engineering, 1(1), 162-173.

Mendes, P., Santos, A. C., Perna, F., & Teixeira, M. R. (2012). The balanced scorecard as an integrated model applied to the Portuguese public service: a case study in the waste sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, 24, 20-29.

Mohammadi, A., Moharrer, M., & Babakhanifard, M. S. (2019). The business model and balanced scorecard in creative tourism: the ultimate strategy boosters. Current Issues in Tourism, 22(17), 2157-2182.

Pamucar, D. (2020). Normalized weighted Geometric Dombi Bonferoni Mean Operator with interval grey numbers: Application in multicriteria decision making. Reports in Mechanical Engineering, 1(1), 44-52.

Pamucar, D., & Ecer, F. (2020). Prioritizing the weights of the evaluation criteria under fuzziness: The fuzzy full consistency method – FUCOM-F. Facta Universitatis, series: Mechanical Engineering. 18(3), 419 - 437.

Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega, 53, 49-57.

Rezaei, J., Nispeling, T., Sarkis, J., & Tavasszy, L. (2016). A supplier selection life cycle approach integrating traditional and environmental criteria using the best worst method. Journal of Cleaner Production, 135, 577-588.

Rezaei, J., van Roekel, W. S., & Tavasszy, L. (2018). Measuring the relative importance of the logistics performance index indicators using Best Worst Method. Transport Policy, 68, 158-169.

Salimi, N., & Rezaei, J. (2018). Evaluating firms’ R&D performance using best worst method. Evaluation and program planning, 66, 147-155.

Staš, D., Lenort, R., Wicher, P., & Holman, D. (2015). Green transport balanced scorecard model with analytic network process support. Sustainability, 7(11), 15243-15261.

Vesković, S., Milinković, S., Abramović, B., & Ljubaj, I. (2020). Determining criteria significance in selecting reach stackers by applying the fuzzy PIPRECIA method. Operational Research in Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications, 3(1), 72-88.

Zhao, H., Guo, S., & Zhao, H. (2018). Comprehensive benefit evaluation of eco-industrial parks by employing the best-worst method based on circular economy and sustainability. Environment, development and sustainability, 20(3), 1229-1253.

Zolfani, S. H., & Chatterjee, P. (2019). Comparative evaluation of sustainable design based on Step-wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (SWARA) and best worst method (BWM) methods: a perspective on household furnishing materials. Symmetry, 11(1), 74.

Zolfani, S.F., Yazdani, M., Pamucar, D., & Zarate, P. (2020). A VIKOR and TOPSIS focused reanalysis of the MADM methods based on logarithmic normalization. Facta Universitatis, series: Mechanical Engineering. 18(3), 341-355.

Published

2021-03-13

How to Cite

Dwivedi, R., Prasad, K., Mandal, N., Singh, S., Vardhan, M., & Pamucar, D. (2021). Performance evaluation of an insurance company using an integrated Balanced Scorecard (BSC) and Best-Worst Method (BWM). Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 4(1), 33–50. https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame2104033d