ABSTRACT
We present an empirical study of the applicability of Probabilistic Lexicalized Tree Insertion Grammars (PLTIG), a lexicalized counterpart to Probabilistic Context-Free Grammars (PCFG), to problems in stochastic natural-language processing. Comparing the performance of PLTIGs, with non-hierarchical N-gram models and PCFGs, we show that PLTIG combines the best aspects of both, with language modeling capability comparable to N-gram models and PCFGs, we show that PLTIG combines the best aspects of both, with language modeling capability comparable to N-grams, and improved parsing performance over its nonlexicalized counterpart. Furthermore, training of PLTIGs displays faster convergence than PCFGs.
- Eugene Charniak. 1997. Statistical parsing with a context-free grammar and word statistics. In Proceedings of the AAAI, pages 598--603, Providence, RI. AAAI Press/MIT Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Michael Collins. 1997. Three generative, lexicalised models for statistical parsing. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the ACL, pages 16--23, Madrid, Spain. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Joshua Goodman. 1997. Probabilistic feature grammars. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Parsing Technologies 1997.Google Scholar
- Rebecca Hwa. 1998. An empirical evaluation of probabilistic lexicalized tree insertion grammars. Technical Report 06--98, Harvard University. Full Version.Google Scholar
- K. Lari and S. J. Young. 1990. The estimation of stochastic context-free grammars using the inside-outside algorithm. Computer Speech and Language, 4:35--56.Google ScholarCross Ref
- David Magerman. 1995. Statistical decision-models for parsing. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the ACL, pages 276--283, Cambridge, MA. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fernando Pereira and Yves Schabes. 1992. Inside-Outside reestimation from partially bracketed corpora. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual Meeting of the ACL, pages 128--135, Newark, Delaware. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Rajasekaran and S. Yooseph. 1995. Tal recognition in O(M(n2)) time. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the ACL, pages 166--173, Cambridge, MA. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Y. Schabes and R. Waters. 1993. Stochastic lexicalized context-free grammar. In Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Parsing Technologies, pages 257--266.Google Scholar
- Y. Schabes and R. Waters. 1994. Tree insertion grammar: A cubic-time parsable formalism that lexicalizes context-free grammar without changing the tree produced. Technical Report TR-94-13, Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories.Google Scholar
- Y. Schabes, A. Abeille, and A. K. Joshi. 1988. Parsing strategies with 'lexicalized' grammars: Application to tree adjoining grammars. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING '88), August. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yves Schabes. 1990. Mathematical and Computational Aspects of Lexicalized Grammars. Ph.D. thesis, University of Pennsylvania, August. Google ScholarDigital Library
- An empirical evaluation of Probabilistic Lexicalized Tree Insertion Grammars
Recommendations
Lexicalized context-free grammars
ACL '93: Proceedings of the 31st annual meeting on Association for Computational LinguisticsLexicalized context-free grammar(LCFG) is an attractive compromise between the parsing efficiency of context-free grammar (CFG) and the elegance and lexical sensitivity of lexicalized tree adjoining grammar (LTAG). LCFG is a restricted form of LTAG that ...
Tree insertion grammar: a cubic-time, parsable formalism that lexicalizes context-free grammar without changing the trees produced
Tree insertion grammar (TIG) is a tree-based formalism that makes use of tree substitution and tree adjunction. TIG is related to tree adjoining grammar. However, the adjunction permitted in TIG is sufficiently restricted that TIGs only derive context-...
Comments