skip to main content
10.5555/1654690.1654693dlproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagestagrfConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Free Access

The metagrammar goes multilingual: a cross-linguistic look at the V2-phenomenon

Published:15 July 2006Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present an initial investigation into the use of a metagrammar for explicitly sharing abstract grammatical specifications among languages. We define a single class hierarchy for a metagrammar which allows us to automatically generate grammars for different languages from a single compact metagrammar hierarchy. We use as our linguistic example the verb-second phenomenon, which shows considerable variation while retaining a basic property, namely the fact that the verb can appear in one of two positions in the clause.

References

  1. Candito, M. H. 1998. Building parallel LTAG for French and Italian. In Proc. ACL-98. Montreal. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Candito, M. H. 1996. A principle-based hierarchical representation of LTAGs. In Proc. COLING-96. Copenhagen. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Candito, M. H. 1999. Représentation modulaire et paramétrable de grammaires électroniques lexicalisées. Doctoral Dissertation, Univ. Paris 7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Clément, L., and A. Kinyon. 2003. Generating parallel multilingual LFG-TAG grammars using a MetaGrammar. In Proc. ACL-03. Sapporo. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Clergerie, E. De La. 2005. From metagrammars to factorized TAG/TIG parsers. In IWPT-05. Trento. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Crabbé, B. 2005. Représentation informatique de grammaires fortement lexicalisées. Doctoral Dissertation, Univ. Nancy 2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Evans, R., G. Gazdar, and D. Weir. 2000. Lexical rules are just lexical rules. In Tree Adjoining Grammars, ed. A. Abeillé and O. Rambow. CSLI.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Gerdes, K. 2002. DTAG. attempt to generate a useful TAG for German using a metagrammar. In Proc. TAG+6. Venice.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Kameyama, M. 1986. Characterising LFG in terms of TAG. In Unpublished report. Univ. of Pennsylvania.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Kinyon, A. 2000. Hypertags. In Proc. COLING-00. Sarrebrucken. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Kinyon, A., and O. Rambow. 2003. Generating cross-language and cross-framework annotated test-suites using a MetaGrammar. In Proc. LINC-EACL-03. Budapest.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Prolo, C. 2006. Handling unlike coordinated phrases in TAG by mixing Syntactic Category and Grammatical Function. In Proc. TAG+8. Sidney.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Rambow, Owen, and Beatrice Santorini. 1995. Incremental phrase structure generation and a universal theory of V2. In Proceedings of NELS 25, ed. J. N. Beckman, 373--387. Amherst, MA: GSLA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Srinivas, B. 1997. Complexity of lexical descriptions and its relevance for partial parsing. Doctoral Dissertation, Univ. of Pennsylvania.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Xia, F. 2001. Automatic grammar generation from two perspectives. Doctoral Dissertation, Univ. of Pennsylvania. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. XTAG Research Group. 2001. A lexicalized tree adjoining grammar for English. Technical Report IRCS-01-03, IRCS, University of Pennsylvania.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  1. The metagrammar goes multilingual: a cross-linguistic look at the V2-phenomenon

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image DL Hosted proceedings
        TAGRF '06: Proceedings of the Eighth International Workshop on Tree Adjoining Grammar and Related Formalisms
        July 2006
        127 pages
        ISBN:193243285X

        Publisher

        Association for Computational Linguistics

        United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 15 July 2006

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader