Vanessa Paz Dennen
ABSTRACT
Distance learning environments provide a rich opportunity for collaborative knowledge building, particularly through peer-to-peer dialogue. Much of the discussion in distance learning environments occurs in asynchronous forums, and it is content analysis of these discussions that constitutes the majority of research in online learning. However few studies in this area provide enough information about the context to know what works and what doesn't. Most studies do not go beyond downloading and analyzing the transcripts after the course is completed. Studies also lack a solid epistemological stance, attempting to capture evidence of individual learning of knowledge rather than examining the process of group learning through knowledge construction. An ongoing lack of attention to a coherent theoretical foundation, examining transcripts without attending to their situated contexts, and relying primarily on reductionist content analysis methods, will continue to limit our understanding of the potentiality and actuality of online collaborative learning environments. In this paper we explore how Stahl's social theory of CSCL can be applied to formal online learning environments to address these limitations.
- Austin, J. L. (1962.) How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
- Aviv, R., Erlich, Z., Ravid, G., & Geva, A. (2003) Network analysis of knowledge construction in asynchronous learning networks. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 7(3), 1--23.Google Scholar
- Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. (1997). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Bauer, M. (2000). Classical content analysis: a review. In M. Bauer & G. Gaskell (Eds.), Qualitative researching with text, image and sound (pp. 131--151). London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Beaudoin, M. F. (2002). Learning or lurking? Tracking the "invisible" online student. The Internet and Higher Education5, 147--155.Google Scholar
- Bloom B. S. and Krathwohl, D. R., (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. New York: Longman, Green.Google Scholar
- Campos, M. (2004). A constructivist method for the analysis of networked cognitive communication and the assessment of collaborative learning and knowledge building. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks8(2), 1--29.Google Scholar
- Dennen, V. P. (2004). Facilitation and student learning: The effects of different instructor styles. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
- Dillenbourg, P., Baker, M., Blaye, A., & O'Malley, C. (1996). The evolution of research on collaborative learning. In E. Spada & P. Reiman (Eds). Learning in Humans and Machine: Towards an interdisciplinary learning science, pp. 189--211. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
- Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7--23.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gunawardena, C. N., Lowe, C. A., & Anderson, T. (1997). Analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(4), 397--431.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hara, N., Bonk, C. J., & Angeli, C. (2000). Content analysis of online discussion in an applied educational psychology course. Instructional Science, 23(2), 115--152.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hathorn, L. G., & Ingram, A. L. (2002). Online collaboration: Making it work. Educational Technology, 42(1), 33--40.Google Scholar
- Henri, F. (1992). Computer conferencing and content analysis. In A. R. Kaye (Ed.), Online education: Perspectives on a new environment (pp. 115--136). New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
- Henri, F., & Rigault, C. (1996). Collaborative distance education and computer conferencing. In T. T. Liao (Ed.), Advanced educational technology: Research issues and future potential (pp. 45--76). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
- Herring, S. C. (2004). Computer-mediated discourse analysis: An approach to researching online behavior. In Barab, S. A. & R. Kling & J. H. Gray (Eds.), Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Hewitt, J. (2003, April). Toward an Understanding of How Threads Die in Asynchronous Computer Conferences. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
- Hill, J. R., Wiley, D., Nelson, L. M. & Han, S. (2004). Exploring research on internet-based learning: From infrastructure to interactions. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook for Research in Educational Communications and Technology, 2nd Edition (pp. 433--460). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Howell-Richardson, C., & Mellar, H. (1996). A methodology for the analysis of patterns of participation within computer mediated communication courses. Instructional Science24, 47--69.Google Scholar
- Jeong, A. C. (2003). The sequential analysis of group interaction and critical thinking in online threaded discussions. The American Journal of Distance Education17(1), 25--43.Google Scholar
- Kanuka, H., & Anderson, T. (1998). Online social interchange, discord and knowledge construction. Journal of Distance Education 13(1), 57--74.Google Scholar
- King, P. M. & Kitchener, K. S. (1994). Developing reflective judgment. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Marra, R. M., Moore, J. L. & Klimczak, A. K. (2004). Content analysis of online discussion forums: A comparative analysis of protocols. Educational Technology Research & Development52 (2), 23--40.Google Scholar
- Mazur, J. M. (2004). Conversation analysis for educational technologists: Theoretical and methodological issues for researching the structures, processes and meaning of on-line talk. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook for Research in Educational Communications and Technology, 2nd Edition. (pp. 1073--1098). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Meyer, K. A. (2004). Evaluating online discussions: Four different frames of analysis. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks8(2), 101--114.Google Scholar
- Newman, D. R., Johnson, C., Webb, B., & Cochrane, C. (1997). Evaluating the quality of learning in computer supported co-operative learning. Journal of the American Society for Information Science48(6), 484--495.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Paavola, S., Lipponen, L. & Hakkrarainen, K. (2002). Epistemological foundations for CSCL: A comparison of three models of innovative knowledge communities. Computer-supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL '02), Jan. 7--11, 2002, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA. Available at: http://newmedia.colorado.edu/cscl/22.html Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pear, J. J., & Crone-Todd, D. E. (2002). A social constructivist approach to computer-mediated instruction. Computers & Education38, 221--231. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Perry, Jr., W. G. (1999). Forms of ethical and intellectual development in the college years: A scheme. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Rourke, L. & Anderson, T. (2004). Validity in quantitative content analysis. Educational Technology Research & Development52(1), 5--18.Google Scholar
- Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, R. & Archer, W. (2001a). Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing. Journal of Distance Education14(3), 51--70.Google Scholar
- Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R. & Archer, W. (2001b). Methodological issues in the content analysis of computer conference transcripts. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education12, 8--22.Google Scholar
- Scott, J. (2000). Social network analysis. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Stahl, G. (2003a) Meaning and interpretation in collaboration. In B. Wasson, S. Ludvigsen, & U. Hoppe (Eds.), Designing for Change in Networked Learning Environments: Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL '03), Kluwer Publishers, Bergen, Norway, pp. 523--532. Available at: http://www.cis.drexel.edu/faculty/gerry/cscl/papers/ch20.pdf.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Stahl, G. (2003b) Building collaborative knowing: Elements of a social theory of learning. In J.-W. Strijbos, P. Kirschner, & R. Martens (Eds.), What We Know about CSCL in Higher Education, Kluwer, Amsterdam, NL. Available at: http://orgwis.gmd.de/~gerry/publications/journals/oun/oun_outline.pdf. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Stahl, G. (2002) Contributions to a theoretical framework for CSCL, In: Proceedings of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL 2002), Boulder, CO, pp. 62--71. Available at:http://orgwis.gmd.de/~gerry/publications/conferences/2002/csc12002/csc12002.pdf. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Turoff, M., Hiltz, S. R., Bieber, M., Fjermestad, J. & Rana, A. (1999) Collaborative discourse structures in computer mediated group communications. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication4(4). Available at http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol4/issue4/turoff.htmlGoogle Scholar
- Yin, R. K. (1984). Case study research: Design and methods (Vol. 5). Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Recommendations
The impacts of the comprehensive learning analytics approach on learning performance in online collaborative learning
AbstractOnline collaborative learning has been an effective pedagogy in the field of education. However, productive collaborative learning cannot occur spontaneously. Learners often have difficulties in collaborative knowledge building, group performance,...
Scaffolding wiki-supported collaborative learning for small-group projects and whole-class collaborative knowledge building
While educators value wikis' potential, wikis may fail to support collaborative constructive learning without careful scaffolding. This article proposes literature-based instructional methods, revised based on two expert instructors' input, presents the ...
Rethinking online discourse: Improving learning through discussions in the online classroom
As colleges continue to expand online offerings, student participation within courses should be assessed to ensure that teachers can best implement effective, responsible lesson plans. This study examined discourse in an online classroom in order to ...
Comments