skip to main content
10.3115/1118220.1118229dlproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshltConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Gathering knowledge for a question answering system from heterogeneous information sources

Authors Info & Claims
Published:06 July 2001Publication History

ABSTRACT

Although vast amounts of information are available electronically today, no effective information access mechanism exists to provide humans with convenient information access. A general, open-domain question answering system is a solution to this problem. We propose an architecture for a collaborative question answering system that contains four primary components: an annotations system for storing knowledge, a ternary expression representation of language, a transformational rule system for handling some complexities of language, and a collaborative mechanism by which ordinary users can contribute new knowledge by teaching the system new information. We have developed a initial prototype, called Webnotator, with which to test these ideas.

References

  1. Mark S. Ackerman. 1998. Augmenting organizational memory: A field study of answer garden. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 16(3):203--224, July. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Thomas Allen. 1977. Managing the Flow of Technology. MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. R. Altmann, M. Bada, X. Chai, M. W. Carillo, R. Chen, and N. Abernethy. 1999. RiboWeb: An ontology-based system for collaborative molecular biology. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 14(5):68--76. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. T. Berners-Lee. 1999. Weaving the Web. Harper, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Jeff Heflin, James Hendler, and Sean Luke. 1999. SHOE: A knowledge representation language for internet applications. Technical Report CS-TR-4078, Institute of Advanced Computer Studies, University of Maryland, College Park.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Boris Katz. 1990. Using English for indexing and retrieving. In P. H. Winston and S. A. Shellard, editors, Artificial Intelligence at MIT: Expanding Frontiers, volume 1. MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Boris Katz. 1997. Annotating the World Wide Web using natural language. In Proceedings of the 5th RIAO Conference on Computer Assisted Information Searching on the Internet (RIAO '97).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Doug Lenat. 1995. CYC: A large-scale investment in knowledge infrastructure. Communications of the ACM, 38(11):33--38. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Beth Levin. 1993. English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. University of Chicago Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Dekang Lin. 1993. Principled-based parsing without overgeneration. In Proceedings of the 31th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL'93). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Dekang Lin. 1994. PRINCIPAR---An efficient, broad-coverage, principle-based parser. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING '94). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Dekang Lin. 1999. Minipar---a minimalist parser. In Maryland Linguistics Colloquium, University of Maryland, College Park, March 12,.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Edward Loper. 2000. Applying semantic relation extraction to information retrieval. Master's thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. S. Luke, L. Spector, D. Rager, and J. Hendler. 1997. Ontology-based web agents. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Autonomous Agents. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Philippe Martin and Peter Eklund. 1999. Embedding knowledge in web documents. In Proceedings of the Eighth International World Wide Web Conference. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. S. Staab, J. Angele, S. Decker, M. Erdmann, A. Hotho, A. Maedche, H.-P. Schnurr, R. Studer, and Y. Sure. 2000. Semantic community web portals. In Proceedings of the Ninth International World Wide Web Conference. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. David G. Stork. 1999. Character and document research in the open mind initiative. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. David G. Stork. 2000. Open data collection for training intelligent software in the open mind initiative. In Proceedings of the Engineering Intelligent Systems Symposium (EIS '2000).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. M. Grotschel W. Dalitz and J. Lugger. 1997. Information services for mathematics and the internet. In A. Sydow, editor, Proceedings of the 15th IMACS World Congress on Scientific Computation: Modelling and Applied Mathematics. Wissenschaft und Technik Verlag.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image DL Hosted proceedings
    HLTKM '01: Proceedings of the workshop on Human Language Technology and Knowledge Management - Volume 2001
    July 2001
    121 pages

    Publisher

    Association for Computational Linguistics

    United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 6 July 2001

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate240of768submissions,31%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader