skip to main content
10.3115/1117822.1117825dlproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesconllConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Learning class-to-class selectional preferences

Published:06 July 2001Publication History

ABSTRACT

Selectional preference learning methods have usually focused on word-to-class relations, e.g., a verb selects as its subject a given nominal class. This papers extends previous statistical models to class-to-class preferences, and presents a model that learns selectional preferences for classes of verbs. The motivation is twofold: different senses of a verb may have different preferences, and some classes of verbs can share preferences. The model is tested on a word sense disambiguation task which uses subject-verb and object-verb relationships extracted from a small sense-disambiguated corpus.

References

  1. Abe, H. & Li, N. 1996. Learning Word Association Norms Using Tree Cut Pair Models. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Machine Learning ICML.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Agirre E. and Martinez D. 2000. Decision lists and automatic word sense disambiguation. COLING 2000, Workshop on Semantic Annotation and Intelligent Content. Luxembourg.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Lin, D. 1993. Principle Based parsing without Overgeneration. In 31st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Columbus, Ohio. pp. 112--120. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Miller, G. A., R. Beckwith, C. Fellbaum, D. Gross, and K. Miller. 1990. Five Papers on WordNet. Special Issue of the International Journal of Lexicography, 3(4).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Miller, G. A., C. Leacock, R. Tengi, and R. T. Bunker. 1993. A Semantic Concordance. Proceedings of the ARPA Workshop on Human Language Technology. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Resnik, P. 1992. A class-based approach to lexical discovery. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 30th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguists.,. 327--329. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Resnik, P. 1997. Selectional Preference and Sense Disambiguation. In Proceedings of the ANLP Workshop "Tagging Text with Lexical Semantics: Why What and How?"., Washington, DC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Stetina J., Kurohashi S., Nagao M. 1998. General Word Sense Disambiguation Method Based on a Full Sentential Context. In Usage of WordNet in Natural Language Processing, Proceedings of COLING-ACL Workshop. Montreal (C Canada).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  1. Learning class-to-class selectional preferences

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image DL Hosted proceedings
        ConLL '01: Proceedings of the 2001 workshop on Computational Natural Language Learning - Volume 7
        July 2001
        122 pages

        Publisher

        Association for Computational Linguistics

        United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 6 July 2001

        Qualifiers

        • Article

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader