Skip to main content
Log in

Recognition Confidence of Welding Seam Defects in TOFD Images Based on Artificial Intelligence

  • Published:
Automatic Control and Computer Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, a target detection approach (Faster R-CNN) based on convolutional neural networks is applied to the training and recognition of typical defects in TOFD welding seam images. Before training and recognition, a total of 162 ultrasonic TOFD welding seam images containing five typical defects are collected. The ultrasonic TOFD welding seam image dataset required for neural network model training is established on the basis of the collected images. The neural network model is trained including pre-training on ImageNet, RPN training alone, Faster R-CNN training alone, and joint RPN and Faster R-CNN training. During training, the parameters in the program are adjusted, and, then, the convergence of the neural network models and recognition performance are compared after the same training iterations. It is found that the neural network model has a tendency to converge only when the batch size is 10 and the learning rate is 0.001. Under this parameter configuration condition, the program conducts training with more iterations and is used to identify welding seam defects. The results show that the program is accurate in locating typical defects in the images, and the recognition confidence for all kinds of defects is more than 0.9. Compared with the other parameter configuration conditions after the same training iterations, the program has the highest recognition confidence in identifying all types of defects when the batch size is 10 and the learning rate is 0.001.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Zhen, N., The influence of welding defects on construction quality for steel structure, Steel Construct., 2013, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 66–71.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dazhao, C., Research on characterization of weld defect based on ultrasonic TOFD, PhD Dissertation, Harbin, China: Harbin Inst. of Technology, 2007.

  3. Vilar, R., Zapata, J., and Ramón, R., An automatic system of classification of weld defects in radiographic images, NDT&E Int., 2009, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 467–476.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2009.02.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Xibin, F., Classification and recognition of weld defects by ultrasonic TOFD based on support vector machine, Nondestr. Test., 2018, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 52–57.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Murta, R.H.F., de A. Vieira, F., Santos, V.O., and de Moura, E.P., Welding defect classification from simulated ultrasonic signals, J. Nondestr. Eval., 2018, vol. 37, no. 3, p. 40.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10921-018-0496-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Xingfeng, O., Huanwei, Y., and Jianzhong, P., Time of flight diffraction image optimization process based on synthetic aperture focusing imaging, Nondestr. Test., 2019, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 29–33.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pei, Y., Ultrasonic time of flight diffraction (TOFD) detection in spherical tank butt weld and defect analysis, PhD Dissertation, Hangzhou: China Jiliang Univ., 2018.

  8. Duan, J., Luo, L., Gao, X., Peng, J., and Li, J., Hybrid ultrasonic TOFD imaging of weld flaws using wavelet transforms and image registration, J. Nondestr. Eval., 2018, vol. 37, no. 2, p. 23.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10921-018-0476-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Naichang, L., Xiaoxiang, Y., Xusheng, T., and Zhibin, Z., Defect recognition of TOFD image based on Gabor wavelet, J. Mech. Electr. Eng., 2013, vol. 30, no. 12, pp. 1450–1454.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cruz, F.C., Filho, E.F.S., Albuquerque, M.C.S., Silva, I.C., Farias, C.T.T., and Gouvêa, L.L., Efficient feature selection for neural network based detection of flaws in steel welded joints using ultrasound testing, Ultrasonics, 2017, vol. 73, pp. 1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2016.08.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu, J., Xu, G., Ren, L., Qian, Z., and Ren, L., Defect intelligent identification in resistance spot welding ultrasonic detection based on wavelet packet and neural network, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2017, vol. 90, no. 9, pp. 2581–2588.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9588-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Girshick, R., Donahue, J., Darrell, T., and Malik, J., Region-based convolutional networks for accurate object detection and segmentation, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 2016, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 142–158.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2015.2437384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ren, S., He, K., Girshick, R., and Sun, J., Faster R-CNN: Towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 2017, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 1137–1149.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2016.2577031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Simonyan, K. and Zisserman, A., Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition, 2014. arXiv:1409.1556 [cs.CV]

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Min Ding.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Qin Liu, Wang, Y., Ye, B. et al. Recognition Confidence of Welding Seam Defects in TOFD Images Based on Artificial Intelligence. Aut. Control Comp. Sci. 56, 180–188 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0146411622020079

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0146411622020079

Keywords:

Navigation