透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.19.56.114
  • 期刊

非營利組織的議程設定與政策倡議的形成:質化研究的檢證

Formulation of Policy Advocacy and Agenda Setting in Nonprofit Organizations: Examinations of Qualitative

摘要


有關非營利組織政策倡議的研究大多是理論層次的討論居多,較少針對非營利組織本身的議程設定過程及其倡議策略進行實務層面的檢視。因之,本研究乃採取深度訪談的方法,訪問非營利組織的執行長或資深幹部,將分析焦點置於非營利組織的議題形成過程及其對外的倡議策略。透過本研究的分析結果發現,非營利組織的議題來源、議題形成、及倡議策略等相當地多元,不同的策略在各個政策領域中各有其效果,不過,不少受訪者認為在政策制定過程中,以民選政治人物和民意代表為遊說對象的倡議策略,是相當有效的作法。 從問題界定的觀點,政策議題的形成有二大觀點,「自然演化說」(evolution)與「社會建構說」(social construction)。自然演化論者認為,當社會進化到某一個階段,隨著環境條件的演變,會引發某些集體需求和公共問題,政策問題就會自然浮現,成為政府採取行動解決的標的;社會建構論者指出,政策問題不是自然發生的,而是人為建構的產物,不同的行動者依據其價值理念與利益需求而創造問題,遊說政府採取必要的行動。後者的主張在議程設定研究中較受到支持,因為多數的行動者相信他們在議程設定過程中可以採取行動,進而創造問題的「意象」(images)和倡議解決方案,以影響政府的決策。無論如何,由於非營利組織在近年來在政治過程已經成為重要的參與者,分析他們在公共政策上的作為是十分具有價值的。

並列摘要


Based on problem definition perspectives, there have two kinds of arguments about the framing of policy issues: evolution and social construction. The evolutionists argue that, social problems are the product of social development and environment change. Therefore, the problem will be dealt with by government while it was natural matured. On the other hand, social constructionists think social problems are rarely self-evidencely problems as such. Most policy actors have to define the reality of problems according their ideas and interests and convince the government to adopt action for it. The latter are more popular in agenda setting because of most actors believe that they can create image of problem and advocacy solutions in the process of agenda setting. However, due to nonprofit organizations becoming an important player and participant in the public policy and political processes, it is valuable to analyze what they do and how they do it. There has been much theoretical discussion about nonprofit organization advocacy. But only a few empirical studies explored the process of agenda setting and the different strategies of advocacy they taken in practice. In this article, we have tried to provide a more precise portrait of the formulation of issues within nonprofit organizations and advocacy activities in which they participate. We conducted in-depth interviews with chief of executive or senior directors in organizations to obtain more detailed information on their activities regarding the processes of agenda setting and the strategies of organization's policy advocacy. Analysis of the findings indicates that there have various types of agenda setting and a lot of strategies of policy advocacy in nonprofit organizations. Although the effectiveness of strategies used to influence government and public also depended on different field. But on formulating public policy, many respondents believe that it was seemed to be the most effective to exert pressure on elected political leaders or congressmen in most cases.

參考文獻


王順民(2006)。當代台灣地區非營利組織的社會行銷及其相關議題論述。社區發展季刊。115,53-64。
司徒達賢(1999)。非營利組織的經營管理。台北市:天下遠見。
江明修(1995)。非營利組織領導行爲之研究。問題與研究。34(10),77-98。
江明修(2001)。第三部門經營策略與社會參與。台北市:智勝。
吳得源(2006)。全球治理在公共政策理論發展之擴充。行政暨政策學報。42,1-36。

被引用紀錄


簡詩婷(2018)。台灣同性婚姻政策形成過程之探討—以政策倡導聯盟為分析途徑〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2018.00028
王崇懋(2017)。太陽花學運中學生團體的社會建構〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2017.00431
楊永吉(2017)。從國民住宅到社會住宅之政策變遷:以多元流程模式分析〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2017.00270
莊珮怡(2013)。議題網絡對我國社會住宅政策形成之影響:以社會住宅推動聯盟為例〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2013.00308
沈佩蓉(2021)。住院醫師適用勞基法之政策形成過程——多元流程模式之觀點〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU202100927

延伸閱讀