- Volume 50 (2005)
- Vol. 50 (2005)
- >
- Issue 1
- No. 1
- >
- Pages 83 - 89
- pp. 83 - 89
Kupfer, Katharina: Die Demonstrativpronomina im Rigveda. Frankfurt am Main usw., Peter Lang, 2002, 8° [xx], 403S. (Europäische Hochschulschriften. Reihe 21: Linguistik, 244.) Brosch. 60,30€.
1 Hawkins, John A. 1978. Definiteness and indefiniteness. A study in reference and grammaticality prediction. London: Humanities Press.
2 Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. 1997. Deiktikon, Artikel, Nominalphrase. Zur Emergenz syntaktischer Struktur. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
3 Hock, Hans H. 1997. Nexus and ‘extraclausality’ in Vedic, or 'sa-figé’ all over again: A historical (re)examination. In: H.H. Hock (ed.), Historical, Indo-European, and lexicographical studies: a Festschrift for Ladislav Zgusta on the occasion of his 70th birthday, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 49–78.
4 Klein, Jared S. 1977. The Indo-Iranian prehistory of the Sanskrit asáu/amúm pronoun. JIES 5: 161–176.
5 Kulikov, Leonid. 2001. The Vedic -ya-presents. PhD thesis. Leiden University.
6 Kümmel, Martin. 2000. Das Perfekt im Indoiranischen. Wiesbaden: Reichert.
7 Levinson, Stephen C. 1994. Deixis. In: R. E. Asher et al. (eds.), The Encyclopedia of language and linguistics. Vol. 2. Oxford etc.: Pergamon Press, 853–857.
8 Lubotsky, Alexander M. 1997. A R_gvedic word concordance. 2 parts. New Haven: American Oriental Society.
9 Oldenberg, Hermann. 1907. Vedische Untersuchungen. 22. sá und sáḥ im Ṛgveda. ZDMG 61: 833–835.
10 Oldenberg, Hermann. 1912. Ṛgveda. Textkritische und exegetische Noten. Bd. 2. Siebentes bis zehntes Buch. Berlin: Weidmannsche Buchhandlung.
