Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Meeting European Union's Food and Agricultural Prod-ucts Imports Standards: Challenges and Opportunities for Developing Countries

Year 2018, Volume: 2 Issue: 3, 225 - 234, 30.09.2018
https://doi.org/10.29023/alanyaakademik.318299

Abstract

This paper aims to examine the European Union (EU) sanitary and phytosanitary standards (SPSS) regulations and Rapid Alert System for Food and Feed (RASFF) mode of operation for importing food and agricultural products from developing countries. The authors discussed different EU’s rules for importing food and agricultural products from developing countries. These includes food hygiene packing, hazard analysis of critical control point (HACCP), Traceability and RASFF activities. Accessing EU markets is not an easy tasks for agro-food industries among developing countries. Although there is no any barrier for trade to EU markets, but the stringent sanitary and phytosanitary standards (SPSS) make it difficult for developing countries to export their Food and Agricultural Products into EU markets.

References

  • Ababouch, L., G. Gandini and J. Ryder (2005). Causes of Detentions and Rejections in International Fish Trade. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/docrep/008/y5924e/y5924e00.htm on 5th December, 2016) .
  • Alavi, R. (2009). Sanitary Standards in the EU: The Impact on Malaysian Fishing Industry. Journal of Economic Cooperation & Development, 30(4). 51-86.
  • Batz, M., J. Glenn and J. Morris (2010). Building the Science Foundation of a Modern Food Safety System. Lessons from Denmark. The Netherlands, and the UK on Creating a More Coordinated and Integrated Approach to Food Safety Information. Retrieved from http://www.pewtrusts.org/~/media/legacy/uploadedfiles/phg/content_level_pages/reports/psprptbuildingthesciencepdf.pdf.
  • Blackburn, C.D.W (2003). “Microbiological Analysis and Food Safety Managements: GMP and HACCP Systems”. In: McMeekin, T.A. (ed.). Detecting pathogens in Food, Woodhead Publishing Limited, Cambridge: UK.
  • Bostock, T., P. Greenhalgh and U. Kleih (2004). Policy Research – Implications of Liberalization of Fish Trade for Developing Countries: Synthesis Report. Retrieved from: http://www.globefish.org/files/Fish%20Trade%20Liberalisation_167.pdf.
  • Calzadilla-Sarmiento, B. (2002). United Nation Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO) activities related to market access facilitation & SPS measures. A paper presented at the World Trade Organization (WTO) Seminar Technical assistance and capacity-building related to the Agreement on the application of sanitary and phytosanitary measures Geneva, 5 November 2002.
  • Cato, J. C. and C.A. Lima dos Santos (1998). Seafood Safety - Economics of Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) programme, FAO Fisheries Technical Paper 381, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
  • Cato, J. C. and A.L.D. Santos (2000). Costs to Upgrade the Bangladesh Frozen Shrimp Processing Sector to Adequate Technical and Sanitary Standards and to Maintain a HACCP Program.” In: Unnevehr, .L. (Ed.). The Economics of HACCP: New Studies of Costs and Benefits, St. Paul, MN: Eagan Press.
  • Dey, M. M., Rab, M., Jahan, K., Nisapa, A., Kumar, A., & Ahmed, M. (2005). Food safety standards and regulatory measures: Implications for selected fish exporting Asian Countries. Aquaculture Economics & Management, 9(1-2), 217-236.
  • Henson, S., & Jaffee, S. (2006). Food safety standards & trade: Enhancing competitiveness & avoiding exclusion of developing countries. The European Journal of Development Research, 18(4), 593–621.
  • Henson, S., & Loader, R. (2001). Barriers to agricultural exports from developing countries: The role of sanitary & phytosanitary requirements. World Development, 29(1), 85–102.
  • Houssa, R., & Verpoorten, M. (2015). The unintended consequence of an export ban: Evidence from Benin’s shrimp sector. World Development, 67, 138-150.
  • Huss, H. H., Gram, L., & Ababouch, L. (2004). Assessment and management of seafood safety and quality. Food and Agriculture organization of the United Nations, Rome, FAO 2004. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper, (444).
  • ICTSD (2006) Fisheries, International Trade and Sustainable Development: Policy Discussion Paper. ICTSD Natural Resources, International Trade and Sustainable Development Series. International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • Keizire, B. B. (2004). Implications of Liberalization of Fish Trade for Developing Countries: A Case Study for Uganda. Policy Research Paper for the FAO, Rome.
  • Lupin H. (2006). Traceability. Retrieved from http://library.enaca.org/shrimp/publications/traceability_lupin_fao.pdf.
  • Ponte, S., Raakjær, J., & Campling, L. (2005). Trade and competitiveness in African fish exports: impacts of WTO and EU negotiations and regulation. Tralac Trade Brief, 5.
  • RASFF (2011). The Rapid Alert System for Food and Feed Annual Report 2011. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/food/food/rapidalert/report2011_en.pdf (accessed 15th December 2016)
  • RASFF, (2012). The Rapid Alert System for Food and Feed Annual Report 2012. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/food/food/rapidalert/report2012_en.pdf .
  • RASFF, (2013). The Rapid Alert System for Food and Feed Annual Report 2013. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/food/food/rapidalert/report2013_en.pdf.
  • RASFF, (2014). The Rapid Alert System for Food and Feed Annual Report 2014. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/food/food/rapidalert/report2014_en.pdf .
  • RASFF, 2015. The Rapid Alert System for Food and Feed Annual Report 2015 Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/food/food/rapidalert/report2015_en.pdf
  • Yunus, M. (2009). EU Ban, HACCP Compliance and Shrimp Exports from Bangladesh. The Bangladesh Development Studies, 32 (3), 41-57.

Meeting European Union's Food and Agricultural Prod-ucts Imports Standards: Challenges and Opportunities for Developing Countries

Year 2018, Volume: 2 Issue: 3, 225 - 234, 30.09.2018
https://doi.org/10.29023/alanyaakademik.318299

Abstract

This paper aims to examine the European Union (EU) sanitary and phytosanitary standards (SPSS) regulations and Rapid Alert System for Food and Feed (RASFF) mode of operation for importing food and agricultural products from developing countries. The authors discussed different EU’s rules for importing food and agricultural products from developing countries. These includes food hygiene packing, hazard analysis of critical control point (HACCP), Traceability and RASFF activities. Accessing EU markets is not an easy tasks for agro-food industries among developing countries. Although there is no any barrier for trade to EU markets, but the stringent sanitary and phytosanitary standards (SPSS) make it difficult for developing countries to export their Food and Agricultural Products into EU markets.

References

  • Ababouch, L., G. Gandini and J. Ryder (2005). Causes of Detentions and Rejections in International Fish Trade. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/docrep/008/y5924e/y5924e00.htm on 5th December, 2016) .
  • Alavi, R. (2009). Sanitary Standards in the EU: The Impact on Malaysian Fishing Industry. Journal of Economic Cooperation & Development, 30(4). 51-86.
  • Batz, M., J. Glenn and J. Morris (2010). Building the Science Foundation of a Modern Food Safety System. Lessons from Denmark. The Netherlands, and the UK on Creating a More Coordinated and Integrated Approach to Food Safety Information. Retrieved from http://www.pewtrusts.org/~/media/legacy/uploadedfiles/phg/content_level_pages/reports/psprptbuildingthesciencepdf.pdf.
  • Blackburn, C.D.W (2003). “Microbiological Analysis and Food Safety Managements: GMP and HACCP Systems”. In: McMeekin, T.A. (ed.). Detecting pathogens in Food, Woodhead Publishing Limited, Cambridge: UK.
  • Bostock, T., P. Greenhalgh and U. Kleih (2004). Policy Research – Implications of Liberalization of Fish Trade for Developing Countries: Synthesis Report. Retrieved from: http://www.globefish.org/files/Fish%20Trade%20Liberalisation_167.pdf.
  • Calzadilla-Sarmiento, B. (2002). United Nation Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO) activities related to market access facilitation & SPS measures. A paper presented at the World Trade Organization (WTO) Seminar Technical assistance and capacity-building related to the Agreement on the application of sanitary and phytosanitary measures Geneva, 5 November 2002.
  • Cato, J. C. and C.A. Lima dos Santos (1998). Seafood Safety - Economics of Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) programme, FAO Fisheries Technical Paper 381, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
  • Cato, J. C. and A.L.D. Santos (2000). Costs to Upgrade the Bangladesh Frozen Shrimp Processing Sector to Adequate Technical and Sanitary Standards and to Maintain a HACCP Program.” In: Unnevehr, .L. (Ed.). The Economics of HACCP: New Studies of Costs and Benefits, St. Paul, MN: Eagan Press.
  • Dey, M. M., Rab, M., Jahan, K., Nisapa, A., Kumar, A., & Ahmed, M. (2005). Food safety standards and regulatory measures: Implications for selected fish exporting Asian Countries. Aquaculture Economics & Management, 9(1-2), 217-236.
  • Henson, S., & Jaffee, S. (2006). Food safety standards & trade: Enhancing competitiveness & avoiding exclusion of developing countries. The European Journal of Development Research, 18(4), 593–621.
  • Henson, S., & Loader, R. (2001). Barriers to agricultural exports from developing countries: The role of sanitary & phytosanitary requirements. World Development, 29(1), 85–102.
  • Houssa, R., & Verpoorten, M. (2015). The unintended consequence of an export ban: Evidence from Benin’s shrimp sector. World Development, 67, 138-150.
  • Huss, H. H., Gram, L., & Ababouch, L. (2004). Assessment and management of seafood safety and quality. Food and Agriculture organization of the United Nations, Rome, FAO 2004. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper, (444).
  • ICTSD (2006) Fisheries, International Trade and Sustainable Development: Policy Discussion Paper. ICTSD Natural Resources, International Trade and Sustainable Development Series. International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • Keizire, B. B. (2004). Implications of Liberalization of Fish Trade for Developing Countries: A Case Study for Uganda. Policy Research Paper for the FAO, Rome.
  • Lupin H. (2006). Traceability. Retrieved from http://library.enaca.org/shrimp/publications/traceability_lupin_fao.pdf.
  • Ponte, S., Raakjær, J., & Campling, L. (2005). Trade and competitiveness in African fish exports: impacts of WTO and EU negotiations and regulation. Tralac Trade Brief, 5.
  • RASFF (2011). The Rapid Alert System for Food and Feed Annual Report 2011. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/food/food/rapidalert/report2011_en.pdf (accessed 15th December 2016)
  • RASFF, (2012). The Rapid Alert System for Food and Feed Annual Report 2012. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/food/food/rapidalert/report2012_en.pdf .
  • RASFF, (2013). The Rapid Alert System for Food and Feed Annual Report 2013. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/food/food/rapidalert/report2013_en.pdf.
  • RASFF, (2014). The Rapid Alert System for Food and Feed Annual Report 2014. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/food/food/rapidalert/report2014_en.pdf .
  • RASFF, 2015. The Rapid Alert System for Food and Feed Annual Report 2015 Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/food/food/rapidalert/report2015_en.pdf
  • Yunus, M. (2009). EU Ban, HACCP Compliance and Shrimp Exports from Bangladesh. The Bangladesh Development Studies, 32 (3), 41-57.
There are 23 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Economics
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Abdullahi Iliyasu 0000-0002-3967-7380

Mohamed Zainalabidin This is me 0000-0002-3967-7380

Publication Date September 30, 2018
Acceptance Date September 27, 2018
Published in Issue Year 2018 Volume: 2 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Iliyasu, A., & Zainalabidin, M. (2018). Meeting European Union’s Food and Agricultural Prod-ucts Imports Standards: Challenges and Opportunities for Developing Countries. Alanya Akademik Bakış, 2(3), 225-234. https://doi.org/10.29023/alanyaakademik.318299