Home About Us Contact Us

Official Journals By StatPerson Publication

Table of Content - Volume 14 Issue 2 - May 2020

 

Evaluation of clinical presentations and short-term results of management of slipped capital femoral epiphysis

 

Charles Abraham1, Nithin Thomas Philip2*

 

1Associate Professor, 2Assistant Professor Department of Orthopaedics, Believers Church Medical College Hospital Thiruvalla 689103, INDIA.

Email: drcharlesabraham@gmail.com, drnithintphilip@gmail.com.

 

Abstract               Background: Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis (SCFE) is an adolescent hip disorder in which there is gradual or acute disruption through the capital physeal plate during a period of rapid growth in adolescence, weakening of upper femoral physis and shearing stress from incumbent body weight may cause the femoral head to become displaced from its normal relation to the formal neck. Much has been learned about the epidemiology, the aetiology and the pathogenesis of this condition. Pinning in situ for most patients with slipped capital femoral epiphysis remains the gold standard for treatment based on reports of increased safety (less osteonecrosis and chondrolysis) with satisfactory clinical function. This study was done to evaluate the clinical presentations and short-term results of management of Slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Material and Methods: A Cross sectional analytical study design was implemented using data obtained from patient records and radiological examinations of patients who were treated in our medical college from January 1993 to January 2003 14 hips (11 patients) with slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Clinical and Radiological data was collected pre and post treatment for analysis. Epidemiological data were also collected and analysed accordingly. Results: The male female ratio in the study was 3:1. The average age of onset in Males in this study was 14.5 years and of the females was 11.8 years. The ratio of involvement of left hip to right hip in this study was 3: 1, 27% of children in this study had bilateral slip. The slip angle in AP view was found to be less than that of lateral view in almost all the patients but no specific pattern was noted in the difference in slip angle (slip angle in lateral view minus slip angle in AP view) for different grades of slip. There is a tendency for hips treated with 3 pins/ screws for higher incidence of complication than 2 pins / screws. Early fusion of epiphysis occurred in all cases and is not related to the number of pins /screws used. The average time taken for fusion of epiphysis was 8.28 months. The two cases of chondrolysis seen in this study were in treated hips associated with pin penetration. Rotatory movements are most affected followed by movements in coronal plane. There was 50% improvement in range of movement in both the planes mentioned above at one year follow up. Conclusion: Slipped capital femoral epiphysis is more common in boys than girls. Left hip is more commonly affected than the right with involvement of the contralateral hip in 1/3rd of the cases. It is essentially a disease of adolescence where obese children are more prone to be affected. Rotatory movements are the most affected which is followed by movements is coronal plane. Frog lateral view reveals slip angle more than the AP view. No relationship was noted between the grade of slip and the percentage of correction obtained after closed reduction. Two hips were associated with pin penetration which subsequently developed chondrolysis.

Keywords: Slipped Capital femoral Epiphysis (SCFE), Percutaneous Pinning, Functional outcome

 

INTRODUCTION

Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis (SCFE) is an adolescent hip disorder in which there is gradual or acute disruption through the capital physeal plate.1 The usual deformity consists of an upward and anterior movement of the femoral neck on the capital epiphysis, which become displaced posteriorly and inferiorly.2,3 The short-term goal4 of treatment of Slipped capital femoral epiphysis is to restore the function of the hip; the long-term goal5 is to delay the development of degenerative joint disease. Pinning in situ for most patients with slipped capital femoral epiphysis remains the gold standard for treatment based on reports of increased safety (less osteonecrosis and chondrolysis) with satisfactory clinical function. Manipulation of moderate to severe slips has been reported with varying success.6

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A Cross sectional analytical study design was implemented using data obtained from patient records and radiological examinations of patients who were treated in our medical college from January 1993 to January 2003 14 hips (11 patients) with slipped capital femoral epiphysis. All were treated with traction and early operative stabilization. The duration of follow up was the time from the onset of symptoms to the most recent evaluation. Grade I, II and III slips were treated with in situ pinning and grade IV slip (one case) was treated by open reduction following cuneiform osteotomy and fixation with pins. The age at diagnosis, gender, presenting complaints with its duration, body weight, height, laterality of the slip, month of presentation and duration of symptoms were requested for each patient. Arc of movements in different planes at presentation were also noted from chart review. Data regarding preoperative physical examination, operative technique, complications, total arc of movement at follow-ups and subjective reports of pain, dysfunction or limp were gathered from the chart review. Radiographs were examined and measured to determine the magnitude of slip preoperatively in 2 planes: antero-posterior (AP) view and frog or true lateral view. When the contralateral side was normal, the slip angle was calculated by subtracting the opposite measurement. If the opposite hip was clinically or radiologically abnormal, normal angles of physeal inclination (145 degrees in AP and IO degrees in lateral) were used for subtraction.

Specific data related to surgery such as the time elapsed between onset of symptoms and surgery, the type of reduction attempted (closed I open). Number of pins / screws used for fixation were noted.

Improvement in the femoral head shaft angle were measured from the postoperative X-rays in all the patients who underwent closed reduction. Follow up X-rays were reviewed to note down the following: 1. progression of slips, 2. screw I pin penetration, 3. pin breakage, 4. avascular necrosis, 5. Chondrolysis, 6. fusion of epiphysis

The hips were classified as chronic (having symptoms for > 3 weeks), acute (having symptoms for <3 weeks), or asymptomatic (bilateral cases in which the asymptomatic hip was either diagnosed at the same time as the opposite [simultaneous] or later [ sequential]) Body weight is classified as obese (95th percentile for age), overweight (90th-95th percentile), above average (50th-89th percentile), below average (10th - 49th percentile) and underweight (<l0th percentile).

Pre-operative treatment

Initially, all patients were admitted for strict bed rest and longitudinal skin traction. Once the patient was transferred to the radiolucent table, the surgeon examined the affected hip under fluoroscopy. By gently rotating the leg, the epiphysis was observed for evidence of mobility.

Operative procedure

Closed reduction is attempted by gentle abduction and internal rotation under general anaesthesia. After closed reduction the trochanter and upper end of femur is approached laterally. Epiphysis was then fixed to the neck by passing pins/screws (Austin Moore's pin/ Knowles pin / 6.5mm cannulated screw) from the lateral surface of femur below the trochanteric flare through the neck and across the epiphyseal plate.

After treatment

Patients were discharged from the hospital after suture removal. Weight bearing (partial) was advised after 6 weeks. Intensive hamstring / quadriceps exercises were advised during the post-operative period. Full weight bearing is started by 10-12 weeks. Implant removal is done at one year after the fusion of epiphysis. X-rays were taken at immediate post-op, after 6 weeks, at 6 months, and at I year follow up periods. Additional X-rays were taken if specific complaints warrants.

Observations and Results:

  1. Epidemiological results:

Out of the 11 children 3 were females with an average age of 11.88 years (ranging from (27.3%) and 8 boys (72.7%) with a male: female ratio of 3:1 The average age for the males was 14.5 years (ranging from 10 - 13 years), and the average age for the females was 11.88 years (ranging from 10 13 years). Eight (72.7%) children had unilateral affection of the hip and 3 (27.3%) had bilateral affection of the hips. Of the unilateral cases 2 (25%) had right hip involvement and 6 (75%) had left involvement. In bilateral cases the second slip was diagnosed within an average period of 9 months (ranging from 10 - l 9 months). Six children had (42.85%) chronic, 7 (50%) acute and 1 (0.07%) acute on chronic slip. 6 (60%) children were obese, 1 (10%) overweight, 3 (30%) above average, and none were below average and underweight. The average weight of the children was found to be 50-60 kg. The mean duration of follow up from the onset of symptom was 14.5 months (ranging from 8 months to 24 months).

Grade 1 has one obese child and grade 2 had 5 obese and 2 average weight, Grade 3 had 3 obese and 1 overweight and grade 4 had one average weight child. Most of the hips showed Grade II slip. The number of hips in each grade of slip are as follows:

 

Grades of Slip and Weight status of the child

Table 1:

Grade

No. of hip

Weight Status

I

1

1 Obese

II

8

5 Obese, 2 Average

III

4

3 Obese, 1 Overweight

IV

1

1 Average

 

  1. Radiological results

Slip angle: Preoperatively the average slip angle was largest in lateral view at an average of 30.64 degrees (ranging from 0-62 degrees) followed by the AP view at 20.14 degrees (ranging from 0- 50 degrees). The average difference between the degree of slip in lateral view and AP view is 10.5 degrees (ranging from 2-30 degrees). The grade wise difference in degree of slip between lateral and AP views are as follows:

 

Table 2:

Grade of slip

Difference in slip angle between AP and lateral view

II

8 degrees

III

18.25 degrees

IV

10 degrees

No definite pattern was noted to determine any significance between the difference in slip angle and the grade of slip.

Reduction: Closed reduction was done in 12 hips with varying degrees of reduction in 11 hips and no reduction in one hip. One patient had 10 degrees overcorrection in AP view which also had chondrolysis following pin penetration. Reduction was not attempted on one hip with grade I slip and One hip with grade IV slip underwent open reduction following cuneiform osteotomy.

The grade wise percentages of correction obtained in lateral view are as follows:

 

Table 3:

Grade of slip

% of correction obtained on 1ateral view

II

34-16¾ (2 patients missed due to lack of X-rays)

III

66.3% -

IV

50% -

 

No pattern in the relationship was seen between the grade of slip and the percentage of correction obtained in the lateral view.

Implants

The relationship between number of pins/screws used and occurrence of implant penetration are as follows.

Table 4:

No. of pins/screws used

% of hips

I

14.2%

2

64.2%

3

21.4%

None developed progression of slip. There was no significant relationship between the number of pins used and the time taken for closure of epiphysis. As frequent X- rays were not taken, the specific period of fusion for the hips could not be determined. The average time taken for fusion of epiphysis was 8.28 months.

Complications

Two patients developed implant penetration. Both had their slipped hip fixed with pins. None of the screws showed penetration into the joint. Both patients with pin penetration eventually developed chondrolysis. None of the patients developed pin breakage, AVN, or growth disturbance.


 

  1. Functional results

Arc of movement: Following were the arc of movements of different grades of slip at presentation to the outpatient clinic

 

Table 5:

Grade

Flexion- Extension

Abduction-Adduction

Rotation

I

100 degrees

40 degrees

40 degrees

II

81. 8 degrees

46.25 degrees

39.3 degrees

III

105 degrees

48.75 degrees

42.5 degrees

IV

115 degrees

40 degrees

35 degrees

Average

91.78 degrees

46.07 degrees

40 degrees

The values show a significant restriction of movement in adduction-abduction plane and in the rotatory plane. The arc of ---*0movement at last follow up in patients without complications were as follows:

 

Table 6:

Grade

Flexion-Extension

Abduction-Adduction

Rotation

I

105

70 degrees

70 degrees

II

111.66 degrees

61.66 degrees

67.5 degrees

III

106.25 degrees

62.5 degrees

56.25 degrees

IV

125 degrees

70 degrees

65 degrees

Average

110 .41 degrees

63.33 degrees

63.75 degrees

Therefore the improvement in the arc of movement in different planes are as follows:

 

Table 7:

Grade

Flexion- Extension

Abduction- Adduction

Rotation

I

5 degrees

30 degrees

30 degrees

II

29.86 degrees

15.41 degrees

28.2 degrees

III

1.25 degrees ·

13.75 degrees

13.75degrees

IV

10 degrees

30 degrees

30 degrees

Average

11.52 degrees

22.29 degrees

25.48degrees

%of improvement

12.55%

48.38%

63.7%

The above results show an increase in the range of motion especially in the abduction-adduction plane and in the rotatory plane.

 


DISCUSSION

Epidemiological values

The male female ratio in the study was 3:1. Hagglund et al7 in a study in Sweden found the ratio to be 2:1 and Loder et al.8 in an international study from 1954-1991 got the ratio as 3:2. The age of onset is during adolescence - a period of maximal skeletal growth. The average age of onset in Males in this study was 14.5 years and of the females was 11.8 years. Studies by Exner, Hagglund et al.1, and Loder et al.2 have shown the range to be 13-15 years for males and 11-13 years for females.The ratio of involvement of left hip to right hip in this study was 3: 1. Loder et al.9 in their study got left: right ratio as 3:2 and Hagglund et al.10 got the ratio as 2:1. Why there is predilection for left hip is unknown. So far no definite explanation for the disproportionate involvement of the left hip has been given. 27% of children in this study had bilateral slip which is in accordance to large scale studies done earlier. Bilateral involvement has been reported in different studies to be ranging from 17% to 80%.11,12 Symptom duration is discussed infrequently in the literature (4 months for white children). Many factors ( , ) may influence symptom duration. These include the rapidity with which medical care is available, the child rearing patterns that influence the subjective interpretation of pain. Slipped capital femoral epiphysis is overwhelmingly a disease of obesity5. 70% of the children in this study were in the upper 10th percentile for weight. Slipped capital femoral epiphysis develops in heavier children at a younger age than lighter children. However, such a pattern was not found in this study. This can be attributed to the very small patient population included in the study.

Radiological study values

The lateral view in X-ray reveals the actual amount of slip. The slip angle in AP view was found to be less than that of lateral view in almost all the patients but no specific pattern was noted in the difference in slip angle (slip angle in lateral view minus slip angle in AP view) for different grades of slip.15

The study population is too small to determine the significance of pin related complications (pin penetration, chondrolysis, further progression of slip). However, in this study there is a tendency for hips treated with 3 pins/ screws for higher incidence of complication than 2 pins / screws.9 

Kruger and colleagues16 found that two pins were better than one for fixation of epiphysis. Belkoff and colleagues17 found that single screw fixation18 yields more strength than 2 pin fixations. Another study19,20 showed that fixation with 2 screws did not yield significant increase in stiffness (only 3 3 %) than one screw.

Early fusion of epiphysis occurred in all cases and is not related to the number of pins /screws used. The average time taken for fusion of epiphysis was 8.28 months which is similar to other studies. Loder et al.20 showed in his study that fusion of epiphysis takes place within 18 months of presentation for treatment of first hip.

The two cases of chondrolysis seen in this study were in treated hips associated with pin penetration. Studies in literature have shown a higher incidence of chondrolysis with pin penetration.

 

Functional results

Rotational deformity is a well-recognized symptom in slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Rotatory movements are most affected followed by movements in coronal plane. There was 50% improvement in range of movement in both the planes mentioned above at one year follow up. This can be attributed to the subsidence of muscular spasm around the hip joint and to the remodelling of the metaphysis

 

CONCLUSION

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis is more common in boys than girls. Left hip is more commonly affected than the right and Xray in approximately one third of the cases shows bilateral involvement. It is essentially a disease of adolescence where obese children are more prone to be affected. Bilateral involvement was found to be in 27% of the children in our study. Rotatory movements are the most affected which is followed by movements is coronal plane. Frog lateral view reveals slip angle more than the AP view. No relationship was noted between the grade of slip and the percentage of correction obtained after closed reduction. Two hips were associated with pin penetration which subsequently developed chondrolysis. There were no cases of progression of slip or implant failure. There is a tendency of hips treated with 3 pins/screws for higher incidence of complications that hips treated with 2 pins/screws. Early fusion of the epiphysis was seen in all the treated hips; the average.

 

REFERENCES

  1. Exner GU: Growth and pubertal development in slipped capital femoral epiphysis: a longitudinal study. J paediatric Orthop 1986; 6:403.
  2. Muller E: On the deflection of the femoral neck in childhood. Clin Orthop 1966; 48:7.
  3. Aadalen RJ: Acute slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Bone Joint Surg 1974; 56-A: 1473.
  4. Hall JE: The results of treatment of slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Bone Joint Surg. 1957;39-B:659.
  5. Boyen DW: Slipped capital femoral epiphysis, long term follows up study of 120 patients. J Bone Joint Surgery. 1981 ;63A:85.
  6. Dietz FR: Traction reduction of acute and acute on chronic slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Clin Orthop 1994; 302: IO I.
  7. Hagglund G: Epidemiology of slipped capital femoral epiphysis in Southern Sweden. Clin Orthop 1984; 191 :82
  8. Loder RT: The demographics of slipped capital femoral epiphysis: an international multicentric study. Clin Orthop 1996; 322:8
  9. Loder RT: The epidemiology of bilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis: a study of children in Michigan. J Bone Joint Surgery 1993: 7 5-A: 114 7.
  10. Stasikelis P: Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: prediction of contralateral involvement. J Bone Joint Surg 1996;78-A: l 149.
  11. Howorth B: Slipping of the capital femoral epiphysis: pathology. Clin Orthop 1966; 48:33.
  12. Cohen MS: Slipped capital femoral epiphysis; Assessment of epiphyseal displacement and angulation: J Paediatrics Orthop. 1986; 6:259.
  13. Loder RT: A worldwide study on the seasonal variation of slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Clin Orthop 1996; 322:28.
  14. Loder RT: Slipped capital femoral epiphysis associated with endocrine disorders. J Paediatr Orthop 1995; 15:349.
  15. Klein A: Roentgenographic features of slipped capital femoral epiphysis.Am J Roentgenol 1951; 66:36 I.
  16. Kruger et al: Biomechanical comparison of single and double pin fixation for acute slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Clin Orthop 1990; 259:277.
  17. Belkoff SM: Biomechanical comparison of 1 screw and 2 divergent pin internal fixation for treatment of slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Arn J Vet Res 1993; 54:1770.
  18. Aronslon DD: Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: a prospective study of fixation with a single screw. J Bone Joint Surg 1992;74-A:810.
  19. Kibiloski LJ: Biomechanical analysis of single versus double screw fixation in slipped capital femoral epiphysis at physiological load levels. J Paedtr Orthop I 994; 14:627.
  20. Blanco JS: Comparison of single pin versus multiple pin fixation in treatment of slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Paediatric Orthop.

 

Policy for Articles with Open Access:
Authors who publish with MedPulse International Journal of Orthopedics, (Print ISSN: 2579-0889, Online) (ISSN: 2636-4638) agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.