Abstracting and Indexing

  • CrossRef
  • WorldCat
  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academic Keys
  • DRJI
  • Microsoft Academic
  • Academia.edu
  • OpenAIRE

Infection with MRSA CC398 Related to Occupational Exposure to Mink: A Case Report

Article Information

Birgitte Hamann Laustsen*, Oyvind Omland

Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Aalborg University Hospital, North Denmark Region, Denmark

*Corresponding Author: Birgitte Hamann Laustsen, Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Aalborg University Hospital, North Denmark Region, Denmark

Received: 04 June 2019; Accepted: 02 July 2019; Published: 02 September 2019

Citation: Birgitte Hamann Laustsen, Oyvind Omland. Infection with MRSA CC398 Related to Occupational Exposure to Mink-A Case Report. Archives of Clinical and Medical Case Reports 3 (2019): 228-230.

View / Download Pdf Share at Facebook

Abstract

A 59-year old man was hospitalised with dyspnoea, cough and fever, which led to respiratory treatment, later complicated with large central pulmonary embolisms. The only positive finding in samples was MRSA CC398. The patient worked several times as a full-time employee at a mink farm, which was the only exposure to MRSA CC398 in the patient’s occupational history. The Danish Labour Market Insurance recognised the injury as an occupational disease; hence, exposure to LA-MRSA for working on mink farms is a new occupational risk factor in Denmark.

Keywords

MRSA CC398, LA-MRSA, Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus Aureus, Mink, Pigs, Livestock, Infection, Occupational disease, Work, Exposure

MRSA CC398 articles MRSA CC398 Research articles MRSA CC398 review articles MRSA CC398 PubMed articles MRSA CC398 PubMed Central articles MRSA CC398 2023 articles MRSA CC398 2024 articles MRSA CC398 Scopus articles MRSA CC398 impact factor journals MRSA CC398 Scopus journals MRSA CC398 PubMed journals MRSA CC398 medical journals MRSA CC398 free journals MRSA CC398 best journals MRSA CC398 top journals MRSA CC398 free medical journals MRSA CC398 famous journals MRSA CC398 Google Scholar indexed journals LA-MRSA articles LA-MRSA Research articles LA-MRSA review articles LA-MRSA PubMed articles LA-MRSA PubMed Central articles LA-MRSA 2023 articles LA-MRSA 2024 articles LA-MRSA Scopus articles LA-MRSA impact factor journals LA-MRSA Scopus journals LA-MRSA PubMed journals LA-MRSA medical journals LA-MRSA free journals LA-MRSA best journals LA-MRSA top journals LA-MRSA free medical journals LA-MRSA famous journals LA-MRSA Google Scholar indexed journals Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus Aureus articles Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Research articles Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus Aureus review articles Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus Aureus PubMed articles Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus Aureus PubMed Central articles Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus Aureus 2023 articles Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus Aureus 2024 articles Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Scopus articles Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus Aureus impact factor journals Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Scopus journals Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus Aureus PubMed journals Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus Aureus medical journals Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus Aureus free journals Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus Aureus best journals Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus Aureus top journals Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus Aureus free medical journals Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus Aureus famous journals Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Google Scholar indexed journals health articles health Research articles health review articles health PubMed articles health PubMed Central articles health 2023 articles health 2024 articles health Scopus articles health impact factor journals health Scopus journals health PubMed journals health medical journals health free journals health best journals health top journals health free medical journals health famous journals health Google Scholar indexed journals Mink articles Mink Research articles Mink review articles Mink PubMed articles Mink PubMed Central articles Mink 2023 articles Mink 2024 articles Mink Scopus articles Mink impact factor journals Mink Scopus journals Mink PubMed journals Mink medical journals Mink free journals Mink best journals Mink top journals Mink free medical journals Mink famous journals Mink Google Scholar indexed journals Livestock articles Livestock Research articles Livestock review articles Livestock PubMed articles Livestock PubMed Central articles Livestock 2023 articles Livestock 2024 articles Livestock Scopus articles Livestock impact factor journals Livestock Scopus journals Livestock PubMed journals Livestock medical journals Livestock free journals Livestock best journals Livestock top journals Livestock free medical journals Livestock famous journals Livestock Google Scholar indexed journals Infection articles Infection Research articles Infection review articles Infection PubMed articles Infection PubMed Central articles Infection 2023 articles Infection 2024 articles Infection Scopus articles Infection impact factor journals Infection Scopus journals Infection PubMed journals Infection medical journals Infection free journals Infection best journals Infection top journals Infection free medical journals Infection famous journals Infection Google Scholar indexed journals patient articles patient Research articles patient review articles patient PubMed articles patient PubMed Central articles patient 2023 articles patient 2024 articles patient Scopus articles patient impact factor journals patient Scopus journals patient PubMed journals patient medical journals patient free journals patient best journals patient top journals patient free medical journals patient famous journals patient Google Scholar indexed journals disease  articles disease  Research articles disease  review articles disease  PubMed articles disease  PubMed Central articles disease  2023 articles disease  2024 articles disease  Scopus articles disease  impact factor journals disease  Scopus journals disease  PubMed journals disease  medical journals disease  free journals disease  best journals disease  top journals disease  free medical journals disease  famous journals disease  Google Scholar indexed journals Occupational disease articles Occupational disease Research articles Occupational disease review articles Occupational disease PubMed articles Occupational disease PubMed Central articles Occupational disease 2023 articles Occupational disease 2024 articles Occupational disease Scopus articles Occupational disease impact factor journals Occupational disease Scopus journals Occupational disease PubMed journals Occupational disease medical journals Occupational disease free journals Occupational disease best journals Occupational disease top journals Occupational disease free medical journals Occupational disease famous journals Occupational disease Google Scholar indexed journals

Article Details

1. Introduction

In Europe, Clonal Complex (CC) 398 (livestock associated methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus) is the dominant LA-MRSA genotype. In Denmark, the first cases of LA-MRSA were reported in humans in 2004 and since the number of cases has been increasing and LA-MRSA is now the predominant type. Most people carrying MRSA CC398, have direct contact to livestock predominantly pigs or are household members to people with livestock contact. LA-MRSA is widespread in the Danish pig population with a herd prevalence of around 90 % in 2016, whereas this bacterium is only found at a very low frequency in the Danish mink population. LA-MRSA belonging to CC398 was first detected in mink in clinical samples submitted to the National Veterinary Institute (DTU-VET) during 2013, but from then on, the bacterium has been found in several samples from mink investigated at DTU-VET. Later, in 2015 sample types including paws and pharyngeal swabs from healthy mink were collected at pelting in 50 Danish mink farms. LA-MRSA was found in healthy animals on 40% of the investigated farms [1]. In 2017 a study in 5 Danish mink farms found LA-MRSA in samples from mink carcasses in 4 out of 5 mink farms. On farms with LA-MRSA positive animals, the animal prevalence of LA-MRSA ranged from 20% to 29%. LA-MRSA was also isolated from the environment, including cages, but not in air samples [2].

2. Case Report

A 59-year old man, previously healthy apart from congestive heart failure, was hospitalised in April 2016 with dyspnoea, cough and fever. The patient received respirator treatment for approximately five weeks due to increasingly insufficient respiration. Simultaneously the patient was treated with antibiotics including Vancomycin. During hospitalisation several samples were obtained from sputum, nose, trachea and perineum, and submitted to microbiological analysis. The only positive finding was MRSA CC398 in samples from nose, trachea, perineum and sputum. Subsequently the patient underwent rehabilitation and was discharged, but owing to a sudden development of dyspnoea the patient was readmitted at hospital short after the discharge. CT scanning of thorax showed large central pulmonary embolisms. The patient was after discharge repeatedly tested positive with MRSA CC398 and was treated with eradication. Nine months after the first hospitalisation there were no longer positive MRSA CC398 findings in samples from nose, trachea or perineum.

The patient was examined by a doctor in occupational medicine as part of the industrial injury case. The occupational history revealed that the patient worked several times as a full-time employee at a mink farm in the period from 2001 to 2014. There were 25.000 mink at the farm and 3000 after pelting. None of the animals were tested for MRSA CC398. The son of the owner of the mink farm, who randomly worked at the farm, was repeatedly tested positive to MRSA CC398. There were no other exposure to MRSA CC398 in the patient’s occupational history. The assignments included feeding with a mixture of fish waste and waste from pig slaughterhouses, cleaning of the feed silo and scraping off old feed from the cages. Furthermore, two-month-old mink were moved from cage to cage and mink were captured in the cages and put down in a killing cart by means of exhaust gas from cars. In shorter periods, the assignments included hanging the pelts to dry. The patient was granted an early retirement benefit due to the consequences of the industrial injury. The Danish Labour Market Insurance recognised the injury as an occupational disease and the patient was entitled to compensation. His ability to work had been reduced with 90%. The degree of invalidity has not yet been decided.

3. Discussion and Conclusions

Exposure to LA-MRSA for working on mink farms is a new occupational risk factor in Denmark. In 2016 the Danish Health Authority introduced working on mink farms or being a household member of a person who has worked on mink farms as a special high-risk situation for MRSA [4]. Denmark produces 17 mio. mink pelts/year has a leading position in the world. There are 1400 mink farms and more than 6000 Danes work in the mink industry and thus representing a substantial reservoir for LA-MRSA, both in animal and human. Mink are fed 1-2 times a day and feed contains slaughter offal from the pig industry, fish, corn products and plant protein. The feed is delivered every to every other day in fresh condition [5, 6]. In mink farms, contaminated feed is regarded as the most likely source of LA-MRSA. In mink, LA-MRSA is primarily isolated from paws and pharynx, and therefore poses a public health hazard to mink farmers if exposed to colonized animals through bites and scratches or contaminated environmental sites [3]. The increasing risk of being exposed to LA-MRSA in not only the pig industry, but also the mink industry, underline the importance of health personal to ask patients about their occupational exposure to livestock-animals when relevant. Infection with LA-MRSA is often an occupational disease and doctors are obligated to notify the Danish Labour Market Insurance if an occupational disease is suspected.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Hansen JE, Larsen AR, Skov RL, et al. Livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus is widespread in farmed mink (Neovison vison). Vet Microbiol 207 (2017): 44-49.
  2. Fertner M, Pedersen K, Jensen VF, et al. Within-farm prevalence and environmental distribution of livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in farmed mink (Neovison vison). Vet Microbiol 231 (2019): 80-86.
  3. Fertner M, Pedersen K, Chriel M. Experimental exposure of farmed mink (Neovison vison) to livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus contaminated feed. Vet Microbiol 231 (2019): 45-47.
  4. Danish Health Authority. Guidance on Preventing the Spread of MRSA, 3rd (2016).
  5. Danske Minkavlere (2019).
  6. Landbrug og Fødevarer (2019).

Journal Statistics

Impact Factor: * 3.1

CiteScore: 2.9

Acceptance Rate: 11.01%

Time to first decision: 10.4 days

Time from article received to acceptance: 2-3 weeks

Discover More: Recent Articles

Grant Support Articles

    Editor In Chief

    Yasuo Iwasaki

  • Division of Neurology, Department of Internal Medicine
    Toho University School of Medicine
    Ota-ku, Tokyo, Japan

© 2016-2024, Copyrights Fortune Journals. All Rights Reserved!