Social Pathology and Prevention 2019, 5(1):11-22 | DOI: 10.25142/spp.2019.005

URBANISM AND SECURITY ASPECTS OF INCLUSION AND REGIONAL MIGRATION

Hana Vykopalová
Faculty of Public Policies in Opava, Silesian University in Opava, Institute of Pedagogical and Psychological Sciences

The submitted contribution responds to the current global migration and integration issues. It presents a comparison of the knowledge in areas of social inclusion, social exclusion and social cohesion and their interrelations. It points to basic theoretical starting points and concepts solving social exclusion, to the dimensions of social inclusion from the perspective of including marginal groups in the majority society, and to the importance of social capital. It provides a basic analytical and comparative orientation in the field of social inclusion from the perspective of immigration and those socially excluded or at risk of social exclusion. It provides basic information on basic initiatives in the field of social inclusion within the EU, presents a practical project aimed at solving the social integration of people excluded or at risk of social exclusion at the regional level as innovative solutions and aspect of originality. Practical applications in different countries are related to public and social politics. Comparative analysis and research reports have provided an adequate level of knowledge about the problem.

Klíčová slova: social inclusion, social exclusion, integration, integration policy, social integration programs at regional level

Vloženo: 9. duben 2019; Revidováno: 28. září 2019; Přijato: 15. říjen 2019; Zveřejněno: 8. duben 2020  Zobrazit citaci

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Vykopalová H. URBANISM AND SECURITY ASPECTS OF INCLUSION AND REGIONAL MIGRATION. Social Pathology and Prevention. 2019;5(1):11-22. doi: 10.25142/spp.2019.005.
Stáhnout citaci

Reference

  1. Atkinson, R. (2000). Citizenship and combating social exclusion in the context of the social state reform. Social studies, 2000(5), 43-61.
  2. Bartram, D. (2019). Sociability among European Migrants. Sociological Research Online, 24(4), 557-574. doi: 10.1177/1360780418823213 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  3. Berger-Schmitt, R. (2000). Social Cohesion as an Aspect of the Quality of Societies: Concept and Measurement. EU Reporting Working Paper No. 14. Mannheim: Centre for Survey Research and Methodology (ZUMA).
  4. Bourdieu, P. (1983). Forms of Capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for Sociology of Education. New York: Greenwood Press.
  5. Bucheli, J. R., Fontenla, M., & Waddell, B. J. (2019). Return migration and violence. World development, 116, 113-124. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  6. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95-120. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  7. ČSÚ. Český statistický úřad [Czech Statistical Office]. (n.d.). Retrieved March 3, 2019, from www.czso.cz
  8. De Haas, H. (2010). Migration and Development: A Theoretical Perspective. International Migration Review, 44(1), 227-264. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-7379.2009.00804.x Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  9. Drbohlav, D. (2016). We are not a nation of xenophobs. No country is ready for the next migration wave.
  10. Easterly, W., Ritzen, J., & Woolcock, M. (2006). Social Cohesion, Institutions, and Growth. Economics & Politics, 18(2), 103-120. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  11. Falk, I., & Kilpatrick, S. (1999). What Is Social Capital? A Study of Interaction in a Rural Community. Launcestos: Centre for Research and Learning in Regional Australia.
  12. Fokkema, T., & de Haas, H. (2011). Pre- and Post-Migration Determinants of Socio-Cultural Integration of African Immigrants in Italy and Spain. International Migration, 53(6), 3-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2435.2011.00687.x Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  13. Gambetta, D. (1988). Can We Trust Trust?. In D. Gambetta (Ed.), Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relationships (pp. 213-237). New York: Basic Blackwell.
  14. Gang, I. N., & Stuart, R. C. (2000). Does Background Matter? The Transmission of Human Capital from a Planned to a Market Economy. International Migration Review, 34(2), 511-537. doi: 10.2307/2675912 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  15. Goodin, R. E. (1996). Institutions and their design. In R. E. Goodin (Ed.), The theory of institutional design (pp. 1-53). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  16. Großmann, K., Haase A., Rink, D., & Steinführer, A. (2008). Urban Shrinkage in East Central Europe? Benefits and Limits of a Cross-National Transfer of Research Approaches. In M. Nowak, & M. Nowosielski (Eds.), Declining Cities/Developing Cities. Polish and German Perspectives (pp. 77-99). Poznań: Instytut Zachodni.
  17. Kelsey, P. N. (2019). Inclusion, exclusion or indifference? Redefining migrant and refugee host state engagement options in Mediterranean 'transit' countries. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 45(1), 42-60. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  18. Kolibová, H. (2008). Sociální politika 2 [Social politics 2]. Opava: Optys.
  19. Labor Office of the Czech Republic. (n.d.). Retrieved March 10, 2019, from https://portal.mpsv.cz
  20. Layte, R., & Whelan, Ch. T. (2003). Cumulative disadvantage or individualisation? A comparative analysis of poverty risk and incidence. European Societies, 4(2), 209-233. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  21. Leonardi, R. (2005). Cohesion Policy in the European Union: The Building of Europe. Hampshire, New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  22. Levitas, R. (2000). What is Social Exclusion?. In D. Gordon, & P. Townsend (Eds.), Breadline Europe: The Measurement of Poverty (pp. 357-383). Bristol: The Policy Press. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  23. Lewis, O. (1969). Culture of Poverty. In D. P. Moynihan, On Understanding Poverty: Perspectives from the Social Sciences (pp. 187-220). New York: Basic Books.
  24. Lisabonská strategie pro růst a zaměstnanost [Lisbon Strategy for Growth and Jobs]. (2004). Retrieved March 10, 2019, from http://ec.europa.eu/growthandjobs/pdf/kok_report_cs.pdf
  25. Lister, R. (2003). The Idea of Social Inclusion. Speach presented at Social Inclusion Research Conference, March 27-28, in Ottawa.
  26. Massey, D. S., & Denton, N. A. (1985). Spatial Assimilation as a Socioeconomic Outcome. American Sociological Review, 50(1), 94-106. doi: 10.2307/2095343 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  27. Mouzelis, N. (1995). Strategies of Integration and Social-Cultural Differentiation. Copenhagen: CID (Centre for Social Integration and Differentiation).
  28. Narayan, D. (1999). Bonds and Bridges: Social Capital and Poverty. Washington, DC: World Bank, Poverty Reduction and Economic Management Network, Poverty Division.
  29. Navrátil, P., & Šimíková, I. (2002). Assessment of projects aiming at reducing the risk of social exclusion of the Roma population. Part I. Typology of projects. Prague: Research Institute for Labour and Social Affairs.
  30. Pajnik, M. (2019). Autonomy of migration and the governmentality of plastic borders. Dve domovini, 49, 125-141. doi: 10.3986/dd.v0i49.7257 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  31. Putnam, R. D. (1995). Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65-78. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  32. Pūraitė, A., Seniutienė, D., & Greičius, S. (2017). Managing State Border in the Context of Migration Crisis in Europe: Lithuanian Case. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 13(3), 31-42. Retrieved from https://repository.mruni.eu/handle/007/15574 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  33. Reslow, N. (2019). Horizontal and Vertical Diversity: Unintended Consequences of EU External Migration Policy. Italian Journal of International Affairs, 54(1), 31-44. doi: 10.1080/03932729.2019.1548840 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  34. Rodgers, G. (1995). What is special about a social exclusion approach?. In G. Rogers, Ch. Gore, & J. B. Figueiredo, Social exclusion: rhetoric, reality, responses (pp. 43-56). Geneva: The International Institute for Labour Studies.
  35. Room, G. J. (1999). Social Exclusion, Solidarity and the Challenge of globalization. International Journal of Social Welfare, 8(3), 166-174. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  36. Sampson, R. J. (1988). Local Friendship Ties and Community Attachment in Mass Society: A Multilevel Systemic Model. American Sociological Review, 53(5), 766-779. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  37. Sartori, G. (2005). Pluralism, multiculturalism and immigration. Brno: Dokořán.
  38. Simon, P. (2003). France and the Unknown Second Generation: Preliminary Results on Social Mobility. International Migration Review, 37(4), 1091-1119. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  39. Sirovátka, T. (2003). The labor market policy and social inclusion. Social studies, 2003(9), 87-105.
  40. Statutory City of Ostrava. (n.d.). Retrieved March 10, 2019, from https://www.ostrava.cz/cs/podnikatel-investor/projekty-mesta-ostravy/projekty-mesta-ostravy/socialni-inkluze-ostrava
  41. Strategický plán sociálního začleňování Ostrava, 2015-2018. (n.d.). Retrieved March 10, 2019, from https://socialnizaclenovani.ostrava.cz
  42. Topinka, D. (2015). Survey on the feeling of safety around the socially excluded localities and other risk locations in Ostrava. Ostrava: SocioFactor. Retrieved March 10, 2019, from https://www.sociofactor.eu/vyzkumne-zpravy.php
  43. Valenta, M., Lønning, M. N., Jakobsen, J., & Župarić-Iljić, D. (2019). European Asylum Policies and the Stranded Asylum Seekers in Southeastern Europe. Journal of Refugee Studies, 32, 162-171. doi: 10.1093/jrs/fey063 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  44. Völker, B., Flap, H., & Lindenberg, S. (2007). When Are Neighbourhoods Communities? Community in Dutch Neighbourhoods. European Sociological Review, 23(1), 99-114. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  45. Yagmur, K. (2019). The concept of minority/minorities in the European national and supranational EU discourse. Multilingua, 38(2), 213-229. doi: 10.1515/multi-2018-0063 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...

Tento článek je publikován v režimu tzv. otevřeného přístupu k vědeckým informacím (Open Access), který je distribuován pod licencí Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), která umožňuje distribuci, reprodukci a změny, pokud je původní dílo řádně ocitováno. Není povolena distribuce, reprodukce nebo změna, která není v souladu s podmínkami této licence.