The Work of Art in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: What Artists Can Teach Us About the Ethics of Data Practice

Main Article Content

Luke Stark
Kate Crawford

Abstract

Problematic use of data, patterns of bias emerging in AI systems, and the role of platforms like Facebook and Twitter during elections have thrown the issue of data ethics into sharp relief. Yet the focus of conversations about data ethics has centered on computer scientists, engineers, and designers, with far less attention paid to the digital practices of artists and others in the cultural sector. Artists have historically deployed new technologies in unexpected and often prescient ways, making them a community able to speak directly to the changing and nuanced ethical questions faced by those who use data and machine learning systems. We conducted interviews with thirty-three artists working with digital data, with a focus on how artists prefigure and commonly challenge data practices and ethical concerns of computer scientists, researchers, and the wider population. We found artists were frequently working to produce a sense of defamiliarization and critical distance from contemporary digital technologies in their audiences. The ethics of using large-scale data and AI systems for these artists were generally developed in ongoing conversations with other practitioners in their communities and in relation to a longer history of art practice.

Article Details

Section
Regular Articles

References

Ahnert, Laurel. 2017. The Surveillance Commodity, Unequal Exchange, and the (in)Visible Subject in Hasan Elahi’s Tracking Transience. Social Text 35 (3): 1–16.

Banks, Mark. 2017. Creative Justice: Cultural Industries, Work and Inequality. London: Rowan & Littlefield.

Barnard-Wills, Katherine, and David Barnard-Wills. 2012. Invisible Surveillance in Visual Art. Surveillance & Society 10 (3/4): 204–14.

Barocas, Solon, and Andrew D. Selbst. 2016. Big Data’s Disparate Impact. California Law Review 104: 671–732.

Barocas, Solon, and danah boyd. 2017. Engaging the Ethics of Data Science in Practice. Communications of the ACM 60 (11): 23–25.

Barocas, Solon, danah boyd, Sorelle Friedler, and Hanna Wallach. 2017. Social and Technical Trade-Offs in Data Science. Big Data 5 (2): 71–72.

Beauvoir, Simone de. (1949) 2011. The Works of Simone de Beauvoir: The Second Sex and The Ethics of Ambiguity. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.

Benjamin, Walter. 2008. The Work of Art in the Age of Its Technological Reproducibility: Second Version. In The Work of Art in the Age of Its Technological Reproducibility and Other Writings on Media, edited by Michael W. Jennings, Brigid Doherty, and Thomas Y. Levin, 19–55. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.

Boehner, Kirsten, Rogério DePaula, Paul Dourish, and Phoebe Sengers. 2007. How Emotion Is Made and Measured. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 65: 275–91.

Bolter, Jay David, and Richard Grusin. 2000. Remediation: Understanding New Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

boyd, danah, and Kate Crawford. 2012. Critical Questions for Big Data. Information, Communication & Society 15 (5): 662–79.

Bridle, James. 2014a. The Right to Flight. Installation. Bold Tendencies, Peckham, London. http://right-to-flight.com/ [accessed September 3, 2014].

Bridle, James. 2014b. The Right to Flight: Why I’m Flying a Balloon Over London This Summer. Guardian, July 15, 2014. https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2014/jul/15/the-right-to-flight-why-im-flying-a-balloon-over-london-this-summer.

Bridle, James. 2017. Autonomous Trap 001. Installation. Mount Parnassus. https://jamesbridle.com/works/autonomous-trap-001 [accessed December 5, 2017].

Burtch, Allison. 2013. Watching You. Video installation. NYU ITP, New York City. http://www.allisonburtch.net/watching-you/ [accessed December 11, 2018].

Carroll, Noel. 2000. Art and Ethical Criticism: An Overview of Recent Directions of Research. Ethics 110 (2): 350–87.

Cirio, Paolo. 2013. Street Ghosts. Outdoor installation. Various locations. http://streetghosts.net [accessed December 5, 2017].

Collinson, Diané. 1985. ‘Ethics and Aesthetics Are One’. British Journal of Aesthetics 25 (3): 266–72.

Crawford, Kate. 2018. AI Now: Social and Political Questions for Artificial Intelligence. Video, 1:15:30. University of Washington. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a2IT7gWBfaE [accessed September 2, 2018].

Crawford, Kate, and Jason Schultz. 2013. Big Data and Due Process: Toward a Framework to Redress Predictive Privacy Harms. Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper Series, Working Paper No. 13-64. New York: New York University School of Law.

Dewey-Hagborg, Heather. 2013. Stranger Visions. Sculpture and multimedia installation. Various locations. http://deweyhagborg.com/projects/stranger-visions [accessed December 13, 2018].

Dewey-Hagborg, Heather. 2017. Probably Chelsea. Sculpture and multimedia installation. Fridman Gallery, New York City. https://deweyhagborg.com/projects/probably-chelsea [accessed December 13, 2018].

Dignum, Virginia. 2018. Ethics in Artificial Intelligence: Introduction to the Special Issue. Ethics and Information Technology 20 (1): 1–3.

DuBois, Luke. 2011. A More Perfect Union. Works on paper. Various locations. http://lukedubois.com/ [accessed December 13, 2018].

Duke, Lynne. 2004. The FBI’s Art Attack. Washington Post, February 6, 2004. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A8278-2004Jun1.html.

Feldman, Allen. 2005. On the Actuarial Gaze. Cultural Studies 19 (2): 203–26.

Finn, Jonathan. 2012. Surveillance Studies and Visual Art: An Examination of Jill Magid’s Evidence Locker. Surveillance & Society 10 (2): 134–49.

Francastel, Pierre. 2000. Art and Technology in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries. New York: Zone.

Friedman, Batya, and Helen Nissenbaum. 1996. Bias in Computer Systems. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 14 (3): 330–47.

Friedman, Batya, Peter H. Kahn, and Alan Borning. 2006. Value Sensitive Design and Information Systems. In Human-Computer Interaction in Management Information Systems: Foundations, edited by B. Schneiderman, Ping Zhang, and D. Galletta, 348–72. New York: M.E. Sharpe.

Gonzalez, Jennifer. 2009. The Face and the Public: Race, Secrecy, and Digital Art Practice. Camera Obscura: Feminism, Culture, and Media Studies 24 (1): 37–65.

Grau, Oliver. 2004. Virtual Art: From Illusion to Immersion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Graves, Jen. 2014. What Only Artists Can Teach Us About Technology, Data, and Surveillance. The Stranger, December 10, 2014. http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/what-only-artists-can-teach-us-about-technology-data-and-surveillance/Content?oid=21162466.

Gunn, Daniel P. 1984. Making Art Strange: A Commentary on Defamiliarization. Georgia Review 38 (1): 25–33.

Higgins, Hannah, and Douglas Kahn, eds. 2012. Mainframe Experimentalism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Isaac, Mike. 2015. Behind Silicon Valley’s Self-Critical Tone on Diversity, a Lack of Progress. New York Times, June 28, 2015. http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/06/28/new-diversity-reports-show-the-same-old-results/.

Johnson, Deborah G. 2007. Ethics and Technology ‘In the Making’: An Essay on the Challenge of Nanoethics. Nanoethics 1 (1): 21–30.

Kammerer, Dietmar. 2004. Video Surveillance in Hollywood Movies. Surveillance & Society 2 (2/3): 464–73.

Latour, Bruno. 1983. Give Me a Laboratory and I Will Raise the World. In Science Observed: Perspectives on the Social Study of Science, edited by Karin D. Knorr-Cetina and Michael Mulkay, 141–69. London: Sage.

Levin, Sam. 2017. Black and Latino Representation in Silicon Valley Has Declined, Study Shows. Guardian, October 3, 2017. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/oct/03/silicon-valley-diversity-black-latino-women-decline-study.

Levin, Thomas Y., Ursula Frohne, and Peter Weibel, eds. 2002. CTRL [SPACE]: Rhetorics of Surveillance from Bentham to Big Brother. Karlsruhe, DE: ZKM Center for Art and Media/MIT Press.

Lyon, David. 2014. Surveillance, Snowden, and Big Data: Capacities, Consequences, Critique. Big Data & Society 1 (2): 1–13.

Madden, Mary, and Lee Rainie. 2015. Americans’ Attitudes About Privacy, Security and Surveillance. Internet and Technology (Report). New York: Pew Research Center. http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/05/20/americans-attitudes-about-privacy-security-and-surveillance/ [accessed May 3, 2015].

Maffesoli, Michel. 1991. The Ethics of Aesthetics. Theory, Culture & Society 8: 7–20.

Markham, Annette N., Katrin Tiidenberg, and Andrew Herman. 2018. Ethics as Methods: Doing Ethics in the Era of Big Data Research—Introduction. Social Media + Society 4 (3). https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/2056305118784502.

Marks, Laura U. 2010. Enfoldment and Infinity: An Islamic Genealogy of New Media Art. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Marx, Gary T. 2009. Soul Train: The New Surveillance in Popular Music. In Lessons from the Identity Trail Anonymity, Privacy and Identity in a Networked Society, edited by Ian Kerr, Valerie Steeves, and Carole Lucock, 377–98. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

McCarthy, Lauren. 2013. Crowdpilot. iOS application. http://www.crowdpilot.me/ [accessed December 17, 2018].

Metcalf, Jacob, Emily F. Heller, and danah boyd. 2016. Perspectives on Big Data, Ethics, and Society. New York: Council for Big Data, Ethics, and Society.

Moor, James H. 2001. The Future of Computer Ethics: You Ain’t Seen Nothin’ Yet! Ethics and Information Technology 3 (September): 89–91.

Mufson, Beckett. 2017. Meet the Artist Using Ritual Magic to Trap Self-Driving Cars. Vice, March 18, 2017. https://creators.vice.com/en_us/article/meet-the-artist-using-ritual-magic-to-trap-self-driving-cars.

Muir, Lorna. 2015. Transparent Fictions: Big Data, Information and the Changing Mise-en-Scène of (Government and) Surveillance. Surveillance & Society 13 (3/4): 354–69.

New York Times Editorial Board. 2014. Silicon Valley’s Diversity Problem. New York Times, October 4, 2014. http://nyti.ms/1xaAPdt.

Nissenbaum, Helen. 2011. From Preemption to Circumvention. Berkeley Technology Law Journal 26 (3): 1,367–86.

Oliver, Julian. 2014. Prism: The Beacon Frame. Multimedia installation. Transmediale Festival, Berlin. http://julianoliver.com/output/the-beacon-frame [accessed December 17, 2018].

Onuoha, Mimi. 2016. Pulse. Performance (one-time). Site-specific. http://mimionuoha.com/pulse/ [accessed December 16, 2018].

Pasquale, Frank. 2015. The Black Box Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Paul, Christine. 2015. Digital Art. London: Thames & Hudson.

Perini, Julie. 2010. Art as Intervention: A Guide to Today’s Radical Art Practices. In Uses of a Whirlwind, edited by Team Colors Collective, 183–97. Chico, CA: A.K. Press.

Poitras, Laura, and Kate Crawford. 2015. Divorce Your Metadata: A Conversation Between Laura Poitras and Kate Crawford. Rhizome, June 9, 2015. http://rhizome.org/editorial/2015/jun/9/divorce-your-metadata/.

Pollack, Barbara. 2014. When Does Surveillance Art Cross the Line? ARTnews, September 9, 2014. http://www.artnews.com/2014/09/09/privacy-and-surveillance-art/.

Popper, Frank. 2006. From Technological to Virtual Art. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Raley, Rita. 2009. Tactical Media. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Remes, Outi, and Pam Skelton, eds. 2010. Conspiracy Dwellings: Surveillance in Contemporary Art. Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars.

Rieland, Randy. 2014. 7 Ways Technology Is Changing How Art Is Made. Smithsonian.com, August 27, 2014. http://www.smithsonianmag.com/arts-culture/7-ways-technology-is-changing-how-art-is-made-180952472/?no-ist.

Rosen, David, and Aaron Santesso. 2013. The Watchman in Pieces: Surveillance, Literature, and Liberal Personhood. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Roth, Evan. 2012. Multi-Touch. Works on paper. Various locations. http://www.evan-roth.com/work/multi-touch-finger-paintings/ [accessed December 17, 2018].

Shanken, Edward A. 2002. Art in the Information Age: Technology and Conceptual Art. Leonardo 35 (4): 433–38.

Shilton, Katie. 2013. Values Levers: Building Ethics into Design. Science, Technology, & Human Values 38 (3): 374–97.

Shilton, Katie. 2018. Engaging Values Despite Neutrality. Science, Technology, & Human Values 43 (2): 247–69.

Shklovskij, Viktor. 1998. Art as Technique. In Literary Theory an Anthology, edited by Julie Rivkin and Michael Ryan, 8-14. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.

Stark, Luke. 2016. The Emotional Context of Information Privacy. Information Society 32 (1): 14–27.

Steiner, Henriette, and Kristin Veel. 2011. Living Behind Glass Facades: Surveillance Culture and New Architecture. Surveillance & Society 9 (1/2): 215–32.

Stinson, Liz. 2014. These Aren’t Abstract Paintings, They’re iPhone Smudges. Wired, July 30, 2014. https://www.wired.com/2014/07/these-arent-abstract-paintings-theyre-huge-images-of-iphone-smudges/

Tufekci, Zeynep. 2017. Twitter and Tear Gas: The Power and Fragility of Networked Protest. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Vallor, Shannon. 2018. An Introduction to Data Ethics. (Course module.) Santa Clara, CA: Markkula Center for Applied Ethics.

Wang, Yilun, and Michal Kosinski. 2018. Deep Neural Networks Are More Accurate Than Humans at Detecting Sexual Orientation from Facial Images. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 114 (2): 246–57.

Westin, Alan F. 2003. Social and Political Dimensions of Privacy. Journal of Social Issues 59 (2): 431–53.

Whitson, Jennifer R., and Bart Simon. 2014. Game Studies Meets Surveillance Studies at the Edge of Digital Culture: An Introduction to a Special Issue on Surveillance, Games and Play. Surveillance & Society 12 (3): 309–19.

Zimmer, Catherine. 2015. Surveillance Cinema. New York: New York University Press.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.