Transactions on Transport Sciences 2011, 4(4):217-224 | DOI: 10.2478/v10158-011-0022-8

Whiplash Injury and Head Injury Criterion during Deceleration

K. Jelen*, O. Fanta, R. Billich, D. Hadraba, P. Kubový
Department of Anatomy and Biomechanics, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic

Cervical spine injuries have become an urgent problem in modern society. Regardless of social status or background, the high rate of neck injuries is a serious healthcare issue worldwide. The cervical spine injury is mainly caused by external impact and is termed as whiplash injury. In addition, the head also performs a whiplash movement during rapid deceleration. The aim of this study is to monitor and describe physically the natural response of the head to rapid deceleration. The methodology of using an impact simulator was adopted for simulating a load which is applied to passengers wearing a seat belt in a head-on collision of a car at the speed of 30 km/h. Furthermore, a series of comparative tests of two versions (impact with and without a blindfold) were conducted to determine the influence of vision and consciousness on risk and the seriousness of trauma and the results were compared with measurements on a dummy.

Keywords: Biomechanics, head injury, neck injury, whiplash, impact, deceleration.

Published: December 1, 2011  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Jelen, K., Fanta, O., Billich, R., Hadraba, D., & Kubový, P. (2011). Whiplash Injury and Head Injury Criterion during Deceleration. Transactions on Transport Sciences4(4), 217-224. doi: 10.2478/v10158-011-0022-8
Download citation

References

  1. Castro, W. H. M., Schilgen, M., Meyer, S., Weber, M., Peuker, C., & Wortler, K. (1997). Do ''whiplash injuries'' occur in low-speed Real impacts? Eur. Spine J, 6, 366-375. Go to original source...
  2. EuroNCAP. (2011). The tests explained Euro NCAP - For safer cars crash test safety rating. Retrieved from http://www.euroncap.com/testprocedures.aspx
  3. First, J. (2008). Zkoušení automobilů a motocyklů.. Praha: S&T CZ s.r.o.
  4. Goldsmith, W. (1972). Biomechanics of head injury: Prentice-Hall International, Inc.
  5. Gong, S. W., Lee, H. P., & Lu, C. (2008). Computational simulation of the human head response to non-contact impact. Computers and Structures, 86, 758-770. Go to original source...
  6. Kenner, V. H., & Goldsmith, W. (1973). Impact on a simple physical model of the head. J. Biomech, 6, 1-11. Go to original source...
  7. Kullgren, A., Krafft, M., Nygren, A., & Tingvall, C. (2000). Neck injuries in frontal impacts: influence of crash pulse characteristics on injury risk. Accident Analysis Prevention, 32, 197-205. Go to original source...
  8. Kumar, S., Narayan, Y., & Amell, T. (2002). An electromyographic study of low-velocity rear-end impacts. Spine, 27. Go to original source...
  9. Marjoux, D., Baumgartner, D., Deck, C., & Willinger, R. (2008). Head injury prediction capability of the HIC, HIP, SIMon and ULP criteria. Accid Anal Prev, 40(3), 1135-1148. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2007.12.006 Go to original source...
  10. McKinney, L. A. (1989). Early mobilization and outcome in acute sprains of the neck. British Medical Journal, 299, 1006-1008. Go to original source...
  11. McHenry, B. G. (2004). Head injury criterion and the ATB. Paper presented at the The 2004 ATB users' conference. http://www.mchenrysoftware.com/
  12. Obelieniene, D., Shrader, H., Bovim, G., Misericiene, I., & Sand, T. (1999). Pain after whiplash: a prospective controlled inception kohort study. Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 66, 279- 283. Go to original source...
  13. Panjabi, M. M. (1998). Cervical spine models for biomechanice research. Spine 23, 2684- 2700. Go to original source...
  14. Ruan, J. S., Khalil, T. B., & King, A. (1994). Dynamic response of the human head to impact by three-dimensional finite element analysis. J. Biomech, 116, 44-50. Go to original source...
  15. Ruedmann, A. D. J. (1969). Automobile safety device-headrest to prevent whiplash injury. JAMA 164, 1889. Go to original source...
  16. Severy, D. M., Mathewson, J. H., & Bechtol, C. O. (1955). Controlled automobile rear-end collisions, an investigation of related engineering and medical phenomena. Can. Serv. Med. J., 111, 727-759.
  17. Spitzer, W. O., Skovron, M. L., Salmi, L. R., Cassidy, J. D., Duranceau, J., Suissa, S., & Zeiss, E. (1995). Scientific monograph of the quebec task force on whiplash-associated disorders. Spine 120, 8, 1S-73S.
  18. Svensson, M. Y., Lovsund, P., Haland, Y., & Larsson, S. (1993). The influence of seat-back and head-restraint properties on the head-neck motion during rear impact. Paper presented at the IRCOBI International Conference Biomechanics of Impacts, Eindhoven, Netherlands.
  19. Tarriere, C. (1981). Head and Neck Injury Criteria - a Concensus Workshop (D. o. Transport, Trans.) (pp. 218-228). Washington D.C. : U.S.: NHTSA.
  20. Willinger, R., Kang, H. S., & Diaw, B. (1999). Three-dimensional human head finite-element model validation against two experimental impacts. Ann. Biomed. Eng., 27, 403-410. Go to original source...
  21. Yoganandan, N., Pintar, F. A., & Kleinberger, M. (1999). Whiplash injury. Biomechanical experimentation, 24, 83-85. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.