Skip to main content
Log in

Effects and modes of action of live yeasts in the rumen

  • Review
  • Published:
Biologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Live yeasts (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) are more and more widely used as feed additives for ruminants. They are considered as allochtonous microorganisms in the rumen environment, however, distributed daily to dairy cows or beef cattle they can survive in the digestive tract and interact with autochtonous microbial populations. The positive effects of yeast cells have been mainly demonstrated on growth and activity of fibre-degrading bacteria and fungi, on stabilisation of rumen pH and prevention of lactate accumulation, on ruminal microbial colonization and on the set up of fermentative processes during the pre-weaning period. Modes of action of yeast probiotics depend on their viability and stability in the rumen ecosystem. Up to now, the main modes of action identified are the supply of growth factors to rumen microorganisms, oxygen scavenging inducing more favourable conditions for the anaerobic communities, and nutritional competition with autochtonous ruminal species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ADY:

active dry yeast

VFA:

volatile fatty acids

RFC:

readily fermentable carbohydrates

YC:

yeast culture

References

  • Abbou-Akkada, A.R. & Howard, B.H. 1960. Biochem. J. 76: 3445–3451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauchop, T. & Mountfort, D.O. 1981. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 42: 1103–1110.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bernalier, A., Lelait, M., Rochet, V., Grivet, J.P., Gibson, G.R. & Durand, M. 1996. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 19: 193–202.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bonhomme, A. 1990. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 30: 203–266.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brossard, L., Martin, C., Chaucheyras-Durand, F. & Michalet-Doreau, B. 2004a. Reprod. Nutr. Dev. 44: 195–204.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brossard, L., Martin, C., Chaucheyras-Durand, F. & Michalet-Doreau, B. 2004b. Reprod. Nutr. Dev. 44(Suppl): S44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Callaway, T.S. & Martin, S.A. 1997. J. Dairy Sci. 80: 2035–2044.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chaucheyras, F. 1995. PhD Thesis, Université Blaise Pascal, Clermont-Ferrand (France), No. 743.

  • Chaucheyras, F., Fonty, G., Bertin, G. & Gouet, P. 1995a. Curr. Microbiol. 31: 201–205.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chaucheyras, F., Fonty, G., Bertin, G. & Gouet, P. 1995b. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61: 3466–3467.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chaucheyras, F., Fonty, G., Bertin, G., Salmon, J.M. & Gouet, P. 1996. Can. J. Microbiol. 42: 927–933.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chaucheyras, F., Millet, L., Michalet-Doreau, B., Fonty, G., Bertin, G. & Gouet, P. 1997. Reprod. Nutr. Dev. EE5(Suppl): 82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaucheyras-Durand, F. & Fonty, G. 2001. Reprod. Nutr. Dev. 41: 57–68.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chaucheyras-Durand, F. & Fonty, G. 2002. Microbial Ecol. Health Dis. 14: 30–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaucheyras-Durand, F., Fonty, G. & Bertin, G. 1997. In: Abstracts from Rumen Function Conference, Chicago (Illinois, USA), Nov 11–13, p. 33.

  • Chaucheyras-Durand, F., Fonty, G., Bertin, G., Théveniot, M. & Gouet, P. 1998. Reprod. Nutr. Dev. 38: 275–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaucheyras-Durand, F., Masséglia, S. & Fonty, G. 2005. Curr. Microbiol. 50: 96–101.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, G.S. 1974. pp. 149–164. In: McDonald, I.W. & Warner, A.C.I. (eds) Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminant, University of New England Publishing, Armidale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enemark, J.M.D., Jorgensen, R.J. & Enemark, P.S. 2002. Vet. Zootechnika 20: 16–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erasmus, L.J., Botha, P.M. & Kistner, A. 1992. J. Dairy Sci. 75: 3056–3065.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fonty, G., Chavarot, M., Lepetit, J., Canistro, J. & Favier, R. 1999. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 80: 297–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fonty, G. & Forano, E. 1998. CR Acad. Agric. Fr. 84: 135–148.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fonty, G., Gouet, P., Jouany, J.P. & Sénaud, J. 1987. J. Gen. Microbiol. 133: 1835–1843.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fonty, G., Sénaud, J., Jouany, J.P. & Gouet P. 1988. J. Gen. Microbiol. 34: 235–241.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fonty, G., Williams, A.G., Bonnemoy, F., Morvan, B., Withers, S.E. & Gouet, P. 1997. Anaerobe 3: 383–389.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Galvao, K., Santos, J.E.P., Conscioni, A., Villasenor, M., Sischo, W. & Berge, C. 2005. Reprod. Nutr. Dev. 45: 427–440.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Girard, I.D. & Dawson, K.A. 1995. J. Anim. Sci. 73(Suppl): 264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goad, D.W., Goad, C.L. & Nagaraja, T.G. 1998. J. Anim. Sci. 76: 234–241.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, K., Lloyd, D. & Williams, A.G. 1985. Curr. Microbiol. 12: 335–340.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hobson, P.N. 1997. pp. 1–9. In: Hobson, P.N. & Stewart, C.S. (eds) The Rumen Microbial Ecosystem, Chapman & Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ianotti, E.L., Kafkewitz, D., Wolin, M.J. & Bryant, M.P. 1973. J. Bacteriol. 114: 1231–1240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jouany, J.P., Mathieu, F., Sénaud, J., Bohatier, J., Bertin, G. & Mercier, M. 1999. S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci. 29: 64–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, U., Sareen, V.K. & Singh, S. 1994. Anim. Prod. 59: 209–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leng, R.A. & Nolan, J.V. 1984. J. Dairy Sci. 67: 1072–1089.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Loesche, W.J. 1969. Appl. Microbiol. 18: 723–727.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, S.A., Nisbet, D.J. & Dean, R.G. 1989. Nutr. Rep. Int. 40: 395–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathieu, F., Jouany, J.P., Sénaud, J., Bohatier, J., Bertin, G. & Mercier, M. 1996. Reprod. Nutr. Dev. 36: 271–287.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McGinn, S.M., Beauchemin, K.A., Coates, T. & Colombatto, D. 2004. J. Anim. Sci. 82: 3346–3356.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Michalet-Doreau, B. & Morand, D. 1997. Renc. Rech. Rum. 4: 121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalet-Doreau, B., Morand, D. & Martin, C. 1997. Reprod. Nutr. Dev. EE5(Suppl): 81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, T.L. 1995. pp. 317–331. In: Engelhardt, W.V., Leonhard-Marek, S., Breves, G. & Giesecke, D. (eds) Ruminant Physiology: Digestion, Metabolism, Growth and Reproduction, Ferdinand Enke Verlag, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss, A.R, Jouany, J.P. & Newbold, C.J. 2000. Ann. Zootech. 49: 231–253.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nagaraja, T.G., Newbold, C.J., Van Nevel, D. & Demeyer, D.I. 1997. pp. 523–632. In: Hobson, P.N. & Stewart, C.S. (eds) The Rumen Microbial Ecosystem, Chapman & Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagaraja, T.G., Towne, G. & Beharka, A.A. 1992. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 58: 2410–2414.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Newbold, C.J. 1995. pp. 260–278. In: Wallace, R.J. & Chesson, A. (eds) Biotechnology in Animal Feeds and Animal Feeding, VCH, Weinheim.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newbold, C.J. 2003. pp. 29–39. In: Van Vuuren, A.M. & Rochet, B. (eds) I.D. Lelystad Report on European Probiotic Association Seminar, Lelystad.

  • Newbold, C.J., McIntosh, F.M. & Wallace, R.J. 1996. Br. J. Nutr. 76: 249–261.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Newbold, C.J., McIntosh, F.M. & Wallace, R.J. 1998. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 78: 241–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newbold, C.J., Williams, A.G. & Chamberlain, D.G. 1987. J. Sci. Food Agric. 38: 9–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nisbet, D.J. & Martin, S.A. 1991. J. Anim. Sci. 69: 4628–4633.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nocek, J. 1997. J. Dairy Sci. 80: 1005–1018.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Orpin, C.G. & Joblin, K.N. 1997. pp. 140–195. In: Hobson, P.N. & Stewart, C.S. (eds) The Rumen Microbial Ecosystem, Chapman & Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owens, F.N., Secrist, D.S., Hill, W.J. & Gill, D.R. 1998. J. Anim. Sci. 76: 275–286.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Plata, P.F., Mendoza, M.G.D., Barcena-Gama, J.R. & Gonzalez, M.S. 1994. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 49: 203–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, D.E., Schwab, C.G., Socha, M.T., Whitehouse, N.L., Kierstead, N.A. & Garthwaite, B.D. 1997. J. Dairy Sci. 80: 374–384.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, F., Concconcelli, P.S. & Masoero, F. 1995. Ann. Zootech. 44: 403–409.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, F., Di Luccia, A., Vincenti, D. & Concconcelli, P.S. 2004. Anim. Res. 53: 177–186.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, J.B. & Hino, T. 1985. J. Dairy Sci. 68: 1712–1721.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sauvant, D., Jouany, J.P., Giger-Reverdin, S., Vermorel, M. & Fonty, G. 1999. C.R. Acad. Agric. Fr. 85: 70–86.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, F.J. & Ettle, T. 2002. Proc. Soc. Nutr. Physiol., Band 11.

  • Sniffen, C.J., Chaucheyras-Durand, F., De Ondarza, M.B. & Donaldson, G. 2004. In: Proc. 19th Southwest Nutrition and Management Conference, Phoenix (Arizona, USA), Feb 26–27, pp. 53–59.

  • Stewart, C.S., Flint, H.J. & Bryant, M.P. 1997. pp. 10–72. In: Hobson, P.N. & Stewart, C.S. (eds) The Rumen Microbial Ecosystem, Chapman & Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, C.S., Fonty, G. & Gouet, P. 1988. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 21: 69–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tajima, K., Nagamine, T., Matsui, H., Nakamura, M. & Aminov, R. 2001. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 200: 67–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ushida, K. & Jouany, J.P. 1996. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 23: 129–132.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vermorel, M. 1995. InRA Prod. Anim. 8: 265–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, R.J., Onodera, R. & Cotta, M.A. 1997. pp. 283–328. In: Hobson, P.N. & Stewart, C.S. (eds) The Rumen Microbial Ecosystem, Chapman & Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitford, M.F., Teather, R.M. & Forster, R.J. 2001. BMC Microbiol. 1: 5 (doi:10.1186/1471-2180-1-5).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, A.G. & Coleman, C.S. 1997. pp. 73–139. In: Hobson, P.N. & Stewart, C.S. (eds) The Rumen Microbial Ecosystem, Chapman & Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, A.G., Joblin, K.N. & Fonty, G. 1994. pp. 191–227. In: Mountfort, D.O. & Orpin, C.G. (eds) Anaerobic Fungi: Biology, Ecology and Function, Marcel Dekker Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, P.E.V., Tait, C.A.G., Innes, G.M. & Newbold, C.J. 1991. J. Anim. Sci. 69: 3016–3026.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wolin, M.J., Stewart, C.S. & Miller, T.L. 1997. pp. 467–491. In: Hobson, P.N. & Stewart, C.S. (eds) The Rumen Microbial Ecosystem, Chapman & Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zoetendal, E.G., Cheng, B., Koike, S. & Mackie, R.I. 2004. Curr. Iss. Intest. Microbiol. 5: 31–47.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frédérique Chaucheyras-Durand.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fonty, G., Chaucheyras-Durand, F. Effects and modes of action of live yeasts in the rumen. Biologia 61, 741–750 (2006). https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-006-0151-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-006-0151-4

Key words

Navigation