Abstract
More than 99,358 men, women and children are on organ transplant lists in the United States. Pressure on family members to donate organs can therefore be intense. The medical excuse was created to address this potential coercion. It is a fabricated anatomical or physiological reason given to a donor (with or without the donor’s request) that provides an immediate shield against coercive pressure by family and friends on the potential donor. While the long-term risks and benefits of the medical excuse have not been studied, they could arguably include: 1) Reinforced perception that donation is expected; hence, declining donation is aberrant, and requires legitimization by external authority; 2) Eroded family trust of transplant physicians; 3) Eroded family trust in the individual reporting a “true” medical excuse; 4) Falsification of potential donor’s medical record; 5) Development of “toxic secrets” in the family unit; 6) Paternalism; and 7) General erosion of trust in both health care providers and the healthcare system. This author proposes a system of transparent and balanced communication where both the potential donor and the transplant team are clearly cognizant of the voluntary nature of the purported donation and where provisions for “opting-out” occur at any point along the pre-transplantation continuum.
[1] Spital A., Taylor J.S., Living organ donation: always ethically complex, Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., 2007, 2, 203–4 http://dx.doi.org/10.2215/CJN.0401120610.2215/CJN.04011206Search in Google Scholar
[2] Mackler A.L., Respecting Bodies and Saving Lives: Jewish Perspectives on Organ Donation and Transplantation. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 2001, 10, 420–429 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S096318010100406610.1017/S0963180101004066Search in Google Scholar
[3] Sachedina A.A., Islamic views on organ transplantation, Transplant. Proc., 1988, 20 (suppl 1), 1084–1088 Search in Google Scholar
[4] El-Shahat Y.I.M., Islamic viewpoint of organ transplantation, Transplant. Proc., 1999, 31, 3271–3274 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0041-1345(99)00721-610.1016/S0041-1345(99)00721-6Search in Google Scholar
[5] Scorsone S., Christianity and the significance of the human body, Transplant. Proc., 1990, 22, 943–944 Search in Google Scholar
[6] Bynum C.W., Fragmentation and Redemption: Essays on Gender and the Human Body in Medieval Religions, Zone Books, New York, NY, 1991 Search in Google Scholar
[7] Lysaught M.T., Contesting the boundary between life and death: organ transplantation and the identity of the Christian community, J. Health Care Chaplain., 1993, 5, 73–89 http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J080v05n01_0810.1300/J080v05n01_08Search in Google Scholar
[8] Delmonic F.L., Sheehy E., Marks W.H., Baliga P., McGowan J.J., Magee J.C., Organ donation and utilization in the United States, 2004, Am. J. Transplant., 2005, 5, 862–873 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-6135.2005.00832.x10.1111/j.1600-6135.2005.00832.xSearch in Google Scholar
[9] Morrissey P.E., Monaco A.P., Living kidney donation: evolution and technical aspects of donor nephrectomy, Surg. Clin. North Am., 2006, 86, 1219–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2006.06.00810.1016/j.suc.2006.06.008Search in Google Scholar
[10] Surman O.S., The ethics of partial-liver donation, N. Engl. J. Med., 2002, 346, 1038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJM20020404346140210.1056/NEJM200204043461402Search in Google Scholar
[11] Berg J., Appelbaum P.S., Lidz C.W., Parker L.S., Informed Consent: Legal Theory and Clinical Practice, 2nd ed., Oxford University Press, New York, 2001 Search in Google Scholar
[12] Kallich J.D., Merz J.F., The Transplant Imperative: Protecting Living Donors from the Pressure to Donate, 20 J. CORP. L., 1995, 139 Search in Google Scholar
[13] Caplan A., Biomedical Technology, Ethics, and the Law: Am I My Brother’s Keeper? 27 Suffolk University Law Review, 1993, 1195 Search in Google Scholar
[14] Laura A., Siminoff. The Fallacy of the Gift of Life, Hastings Center Report, 1999, 29, 6, 31–41 10.2307/3527870Search in Google Scholar
[15] Fox R.C., Swazey J.P., The Courage to Fail: A Social View of Organ Transplants and Dialysis, 2nd ed., rev., University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 345–375, 1978 Search in Google Scholar
[16] Ashraf H., Doctor and patient groups vote for presumed consent, Lancet, 1999, 354, 230 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66303-910.1016/S0140-6736(05)66303-9Search in Google Scholar
[17] Fox R.C., Swazey J.P., Spare parts: organ replacement in American Society, Oxford University Press, New York, 1992 Search in Google Scholar
[18] Ekholm I., Kidney Donors Don’t Regret, Transplantation, 2000, 69, 2067–2070 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00007890-200005270-0001610.1097/00007890-200005270-00016Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[19] Beauchamp T. L., Childress J. F., Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 5th ed., Oxford University Press, New York, NY, 2001 Search in Google Scholar
[20] DeMarco J.P., Principlism and moral dilemmas: a new principle, J. Med. Ethics, 2005, 31, 101–105 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jme.2004.00785610.1136/jme.2004.007856Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[21] Trianosky G., Velazco Y., What is Virtue ethics All About? American Philosophical Quarterly, 1990, 27, 335–44, reprinted in Statman, 1997 Search in Google Scholar
[22] Nolan M.T., Ethical dilemmas in living donor organ transplantation, J. Transpl Coord., 1999, 9, 225–9 10.7182/prtr.1.9.4.p724081835344u31Search in Google Scholar PubMed
© 2008 Versita Warsaw
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
