Attitude and Community Participation in The Provision and Utilization of Green Open Spaces of The Yard in Palembang

The existence of private green open spaces of the yard which involves community participation in the provision and utilization of green open space has not been synergized with the city government program for the achievement of green open spaces mandated by the statutory regulations. With the statutory regulations on community involvement, this research aims to examine the community attitudes and participation in the provision and utilization of green open space of the yard in Palembang by region with certain density. Data analysis used in this research is a quantitative analysis based on questionnaires which collected from respondents whom have private home yard. Non-parametric statistical tests using the Mann-Whitney test to analyze the differences between the regions. Statistical tests of correlation Spearman rank and Somers'd used to analyze the relationship between variables. The results showed the high score of community attitude, while the participation of the community belong in the low score. There is a significant difference between community in low density regions with community in high density regions as shown in the correlation between the level of community attitudes toward community participation in the provision and utilization of green open space.


Introduction
The city of Palembang with all the complex problems continues to make development in all fields. New developmentsometimesalso giving new problem. One of the misuban environmental problems, whichis the availability and functionality of green open space that has not yet reached its effectiveness, as a result, flood and the hightemperatures is notcount as new environmental problem/issues [1]. Environmental  This research aims to examine community attitudes and participation in the provision and utilization of green open spaces of the yard in Palembang [1]; [5]. As for the goal, necessary targets as follows: identified attitudes toward existence of green open spaces of the yard based on the region with the largest and smallest density, identified criteria of community participation in the provision and utilization of green open spaces of the yard based on the region with the largest and smallest density, the correlation between the level of attitude toward community participation in the provision and utilization of green open spaces of the yard in Palembang.

Materials and Method
This research was carried out in two districts named Gandus Subdistrict (region 1: regions with the smallest density) and Ilir Timur 1Subdistrict (region 2: the region with the highest density). Each sub-district had selected by purposive two subdistrict with the highest number of house hold and the lowest number. In Gandus Subdistrict, selected Gandus district and Karang Jaya district, and in Ilir Timur 1 Subdistrict, selected 21 Ilir D1 district and 16 Ilir district. The community that became a sample is the Household Heads or represents it with the inclusion criteria, which has the green open spaces of the yard, can read and write and is willing to be a respondent. Based on these criteria in Region 1 and Region 2 obtained 102 respondents with a proportion of 50:50.Data collection was carried out from March until April 2018.
The data collected using questionnaire instrument thathas beendonethevalidity and reliability test instrument. Data was tabulated and analyzed with descriptive and statistics. Statistical analysis was done using the Mann-Whitney test to analyze the differences between the regions. Statistical tests of correlation Spearman rank and Somers' d wasdoneto analyze the relationships between variables. The variables in this study i.e. the variable of community attitude and participation. The attitude variable consists of 7 (seven) attitude statements, whereas the variable of community participation consists of 6 (six) criteria of community participation. Each criterion be quantified by using the Likert scale score.

Community Attitudes Toward the Existence of the Green Open Space of the Yard
Attitudes evaluations of objects including good or bad, desirable or undesirable. Attitudes can evaluate people, behaviors, events, or any object, whether specific or abstract [4]. Attitudes, defined by social psychology as "favorable or unfavorable evaluations of and reactions to objects, people, situations, or any other aspects of the world," also enable us to predict and change people's behavior [5]. Table 1 presents the attitude of two groups of people who live in regions with high density and low density toward the existence of the Green Open Space of the Yard.  Community groups in the region 2 (Ilir Timur 1 Subdistrict) tend to have a better attitude than community groups in region 1 (Gandus Subdistrict) in the statement of beingpleasedwiththe presence of green open spaces of the yard, supporting the existence of the development of green open spaces of the yard, granting of education and training, as well as the granting of technical assistance and incentives. The overall attitudes of the community region 2 are likely better than the attitudes of the community in the region 1.
The difference in attitude wasaffected by the difference in knowing about green spaces between groups of community. Communities in the Region 2 knows more about green open spaces better than communities in region 1. Based on the results, there are significant differences betweencommunitiestounderstand that the green open space havevariousfunctions and benefits, as example, actsaswater absorption and the oxygenproducer, owningtheneighbourhood park, and the necessity to have a yard in each residential house.
The attitude which states agree or not with the existence of green open space of the yardwere relatedto theperson's subjectivetoward the existence of green open spaces of the yard oritmeans the feeling of self-belonging against something. The statement in linewhichstatedby Rensis Likert [1] with the frame of thought that a person's attitude towards an object is a feeling of support (favorable) or feeling does not support (unfavorable)on the object. The attitude has 3 (three) components as stated by [6], one of which is the affective component.

Community Participation in the Provision and Utilization of Green Open Spaces of the Yard
General terms of participation of the community contains the notion of community participation or actively took part in an activity [1]. Arnstein proposing the participation is based on the distribution of power between community and the government, whichcommunity participation is synonymous with the power of community (citizen participation is the citizen power) [1]. Further [7] stated the main kinds of participation that warrant major concern are participation in decision-making, participation in implementation, participation in benefitand participation in evaluation [2] and have defined the participation as a voluntary contribution by the people in one or another of the public programme or in criticizing its contents [3]. Table 2 presents the community participation in the provision and utilization of green open spaces of the yard from two groups of community who live in regions with high density and low density. Data presented illustrates significance different of community participation criteria among community groups region 1 and region 2.
Based on table 2, the difference is only shown on the criteria for participation in improving environmental quality in residential area in terms of planting plants. It looks that communitygroups Region 2 is better than Region 1 in terms of participationto improve the quality of the environment in residential area in terms of planting plants. On the criteria of providing counselling, making absorption wells, waste management, optimizing the land yards, berm, other vacant land with various types of plants, as well as activelyparticipate in community lovers of green open spaces there is no significant difference between groups of community.

Remark: * Significant value P <0,05 means that there is a difference in attitude between groups
The assessment on a scale of 1 to 3 for the criteria of participation, obtained an average score of providecounselling on the criteria included in the low category, both in region 1 and region 2. Itisbecause community generally reluctant to give counselling about the role of private green open spaces in the improvement of environmental quality. Attitude and behavior based on the assumption that the house's yard is the privacy of the people who ownit and itcanbe interfered [8]. Average score for criteria participatein improving environmental quality in residential area in terms of making the absorptionwellsbelongtolowcategory. The community generally do not know the technical manufacture of absorption wells. Although the procedures for planning the rainwater absorption wells to yards contained in the SNI: 03-2453-2002. The information was not fully accepted by community,it isalsoneedeedcostmaking. Communities are more likely to drain the rainwater on the lowerland or drain iton existing drainage.
The criteria take part in improving the quality of the residential environment in terms of waste management by category low. Generally, the community in handlingthe waste does not do anysorting, transporting, even processing waste [9]. The community generally accommodate garbage in a single container for all different types of trash households, then handed itover to waste transport officer and then the waste dumped into Landfills.
Recycle things such bottles, buckets of used as potted plants are rarelyfound in thisplace. The lowest point ison community participant criteria to actively provides counseling in community of green open space lovers,amountof 1.06 in region 1 or region 2, with a low category. The community generally have not start toform the non-profit community, a small part of the community who loves green open space and actively involved in the community are those who have the opportunity and the willingness to improve the knowledge of green open space [10].
Based on the above graph (Figure 2), highly participation is thecriteria tofill as optimal as possible the yards, berm and other vacant land with various types of plants directly in soil or in pots,followedwiht the criteria to take part in improving the quality of the residential environment in terms of planting plants.Itisbecause community generally encouraged the existence of mutual system in force in the community. In addition to the local government encourages ofgreeninenvironmental rateneighbourhood,hamlet or urban village. These motifs influence the attitudes and behavior of the plundering of the community towards the yards house owned. The community fillas optimal as possible of land yards with the encouragement of doing planting can add to the aesthetic value of the home, accustomed to the environment of lush, airy and comfortable, and are affected by seeing the neighbor's yards are decorated with different types of plants.
Measurement of the level of community participation in the provision and utilization of green open space of the yard in Palembang with sum average score of 6 criteria, the results obtained by the level of community participation is included in the low category, both in region 1 and region 2. Table 3 below presents a correlation between the level of attitude toward community participation in the provision and utilization of green open spaces of the yard from two groups of community who live in regions with high density and low density. Data presented illustrates the correlation of the level of the community's attitude on each of the participation criteria among community groups region 1 and region 2. Table 3. Correlation between Level of Attitude toward Community Participation **Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed) *Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed) Based on table 3 shows the relationship of the level of the community's attitude towards community participation in the provision and utilization of green open spaces of the yard, there is a significant difference between the group of community in region 1 with the group community in the region2. On the region 1 based on correlation of Spearman and Somers'd there is a positive relationship level attitude toward community participation in improving environmental quality in housing in terms of planting plants with a value of 0.347 Spearman correlation with the weak closeness relationship. On the region 2, the highest-level attitude toward community participation in the planting plants with a value of 0.508 Spearman correlation with closeness relationship are strongly enough. Thus, the correlation of level attitude towards community participation on the criterion of planting plants in the region of 2 larger than the region 1 [11].

The Correlation between Level of Attitude toward Community Participation
The correlation between the level of the community's attitude with the participation of fill as optimal as possible of land yards, bermand other vacant land with various types of plants directly and/or on potted plants showed a significant difference between community groups in region 1 with region 2. On the region 1 has the value of the Spearman correlation 0.299 with weak closeness relationship, whereas on the region 2 has correlation Spearman 0.555 with closeness relationship is strongly enough. Thus, the relationship between the level of attitude toward community participation on these criteria in the region 2 larger than the region 1.
Community participation on the criteria provide counselling role of private green open spaces in the improved quality of the environment, participation in improving the quality of the environment in terms of the to make of the absorption well, waste management, and participate actively in the community of lovers ofgreen open space almost no significant correlation with the level of attitudes [12].

Conclusion
The difference in attitude between communitywhomlivesin the region withhigh density and with low density region is affected by the knowledge gapsofgreen open space between communitygroups. Communities in high density region knowsbetter than the community in the regionof low density. Significant difference on the understanding that the green open spacehavefunctions and benefits as water absorption and the oxygen producer,owns the neighbourhood park, and the necessity to have a yard in each residential house.The difference oncommunity participation only shown on the criteria of participation whomimprove the quality of the environment in terms of planting plants,that community groups in the region with high densitydo better than region with low density. There is a significant difference between the community groups in region of low density with community groups in high density regions in termsof correlationonthe level of the community's attitude and participatein the provision and utilization of green open spaces of the yard. The correlation between the attitudelevel toward community participation to fill as optimal as possible land of yards, bermand other vacant land with various types of plants directly and/or on potted plantsshow the difference significant, as well as on the criteria of participation improves the quality of the environment onresidential area in terms of planting the plant.