Economie et Statistique / Economics and Statistics n° 500-501-502 - 2018 Housing and housing markets

Economie et Statistique / Economics and Statistics
Paru le :Paru le29/10/2018
Robert J. Hill, Michael Scholz, Chihiro Shimizu and Miriam Steurer
Economie et Statistique / Economics and Statistics- October 2018
Consulter
Sommaire

An evaluation of the methods used by European countries to compute their official house price indices

Robert J. Hill, Michael Scholz, Chihiro Shimizu and Miriam Steurer

Economie et Statistique / Economics and Statistics

Paru le :29/10/2018

Abstract

Since 2012, Eurostat requires the national statistical institutes (NSIs) in all European Union (EU) countries to compute official House Price Indices (HPIs) at a quarterly frequency. Eurostat recommends computing the HPI using a hedonic method. Most NSIs have followed this advice, although they differ in their choice of method. Some NSIs use stratified medians instead of hedonic methods. We evaluate the theoretical and empirical properties of both hedonic and stratified median methods. Of particular concern is the comparability of the HPIs across countries when computed using different methods. Our empirical comparisons use detailed micro-level data sets for Sydney and Tokyo, containing about 867000 actual housing transactions. All the hedonic methods perform better than stratified medians. The hedonic methods generate quite similar results, except when applied to new dwellings in Tokyo. This finding shows that the choice of hedonic method can be important for smaller countries with less data. Also, the widely used hedonic repricing method becomes unreliable when the reference shadow prices are not updated frequently.

Article (pdf, 1 Mo )

Online complements (pdf, 781 Ko )

To cite this article

Hill, R. J., Scholz, M., Shimizu, C. & Steurer, M. (2018). An evaluation of the methods used by European countries to compute their official house price indices. Economie et Statistique / Economics and Statistics, 500-501-502, 221–238.
https://doi.org/10.24187/ecostat.2018.500t.1953