##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

In Algeria, the debate on the role of higher education is flourishing; it is very much concerned with meeting the needs of the labor market, youth unemployment rates, and promoting knowledge transfer between university and industry.

Our study offered an overview of higher education system in Algeria, and tried to evaluate the influence of entrepreneurship courses taken at university and outside it on supporting student entrepreneurial intention.

This study was applied at the faculties of Business and Economics, in three Algerian universities, from November 2019 to January 2020, on a sample of 293 comprised students of the 1st to 3rd year.

By conducting the ASTEE questionnaire which contained 57 questions covering multiple dimensions including demographic questions, we confirmed that there were significant differences in all dimensions between Algerian entrepreneurially educated students and European entrepreneurially also non-entrepreneurially educated respondents, which explain the crucial role of university in promoting entrepreneurship. Our results affirmed that, unlike males, females tend to be innovative employees than being entrepreneurs.    

Despite of the satisfactory result, Algeria is invited to be keener in the use of modern methods and in the use of specialized frameworks in teaching entrepreneurship, In addition Algeria should pay more concern to generalize entrepreneurial education in other specializations of university.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. A.Lanero, J. Vazquez, & C. Aza, “Social cognitive determinants of entrepreneurial careerchoice in universitystudents,”International Small Business Journal, vol. 34, no. 8, pp. 1053–1075, 2016.
     Google Scholar
  2. C. Carrier, “Intrapreneurship in smallbusiness: An exploratorystudy,”EntrepreneurshipTheory and Practice, vol. 21, no, 1, pp.5–20, 1996.
     Google Scholar
  3. C.J. Sanchez, “The impact of an entrepreneurshipeducation program on entrepreneurial competencies and intention,”Journal of Small Business Management, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 447–465, 2013.
     Google Scholar
  4. D. Cooper, W. Peake, &W. Watson, “Seizingopportunities: The moderatingrole of managerialcharacteristics on the relationshipbetweenopportunity-seekingand innovation efficacy in small businesses,” Journal of Small Business Management, vol. 54, pp.1038–1058, 2016.
     Google Scholar
  5. D. Karlan, and M. Valdivia, “Teachingentrepreneurship: Impact of business training on microfinance clients and institutions”, Working paper, 2006.
     Google Scholar
  6. D.F. Kuratko, “The emergence of entrepreneurshipeducation:Development, trends, and challenges”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, vol. 29, no, 5, pp. 577-598, 2005.
     Google Scholar
  7. D. Rae, “Entrepreneurial learning: A narrative basedconceptual model. Journal of Small Business & Enterprise Development, vol. 12, no,3, pp.232–335, 2006.
     Google Scholar
  8. European Commission, “Entrepreneurshipeducation in Europe:Fosteringentrepreneurial mindsetsthrougheducation and learning”, Final Proceedings of the Conference on Entrepreneurship Education in Oslo, 2006.
     Google Scholar
  9. E. Kubberød, & I.B. Pettersen, “Exploringsituatedambiguity in students' entrepreneurial learning,”Education and Training, vol.59, no, 3, pp.265–279, 2017
     Google Scholar
  10. F. Liñán, &Y.W. Chen, “Testing the entrepreneurial intention model ona two-country sample. Document de Treballd’economiadell’empresa, num. 06/7. UniversitatAutonoma de Barcelona, 2006.
     Google Scholar
  11. K. Hockerts, “Determinants of social entrepreneurial intentions,”Entrepreneurship:Theory and Practice, vol.41, no,1, pp.105–130, 2017.
     Google Scholar
  12. M. Cardon, &C. Kirk, “Entrepreneurial passion as mediator of the self-efficacy to persistence relationship,”Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, vol. 39, no, 5, 2015.
     Google Scholar
  13. G. Nabi, & F. Liñán, “Graduateentrepreneurship in the developingworld: Intentions, education and development. Education & Training, vol. 53, no,5, pp.325–334, 2006.
     Google Scholar
  14. OECD. (2009). Evaluation of programmesconcerningeducation for entrepreneurship. Report by the OECD Working Party on SMEs andEntrepreneurship, OECD, Paris.
     Google Scholar
  15. S. Coleman, & D. Kariv, “Deconstructing’ entrepreneurial self-efficacy: A gendered perspective on the impact of ESE and community entrepreneurial culture on the financialstrategies and performance of new firms,” Venture Capital, vol. 16, pp.157–181, 2014.
     Google Scholar
  16. S. Kerrick, D. Cumberland, &N. Choi, “Comparingmilitaryveterans and civiliansresponse to an entrepreneurship education program,” Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, vol. 19, no, 1, pp.9–23, 2016.
     Google Scholar
  17. S.C. Parker, “The Economics of Self-Employment and Entrepreneurship”, Cambridge, U.K., Cambridge UniversityPress, 2004.
     Google Scholar
  18. S. Shane, & S. Venkataraman, “The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research,” Academy of Management Review,vol.25, no, 1, pp. 217–226, 2000.
     Google Scholar
  19. W.B. Gartner, “A conceptualframework for describing the phenomenon of new venture creation,”Academy of Management Review, vol. 10, pp. 696–706, 1985.
     Google Scholar
  20. W. Nowiński, M.Y. Haddoud, D. Lančarič, D. Egerová, & C. Czeglédi, 2017, “The impact of entrepreneurshipeducation, entrepreneurial self-efficacy and gender on entrepreneurial intentions of universitystudents in the Visegrad countries. Studies in Higher Education. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1365359.
     Google Scholar