Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Multivariate Model of Stalking Behaviours

  • Published:
Behaviormetrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to reveal the variations that exist among stalkers in terms of actual stalking behaviours the range of offence actions that should be examined was derived from theoretical accounts of the differences between offenders. Four distinct thematic foci were hypothesised characterised by sexual, intimate, possessive and aggressive-destructive modes of offender-victim interaction. To test these hypotheses 50 offences were content analysed into 24 behavioural categories. The occurrence of these categories of behaviour across all offences was examined using SSA-I. A modulating facet was proposed, by analogy with previous studies, of violent sexual assaults that reflected the intensity of personal contact the stalker imposes upon the victim, with the most intense being the most differentiated and least frequent. The results lend support to the existence of a intensity facet that modulates all four aspects identified from the published literature, providing further evidence for a radex of criminality. This radex model is used to indicate biases in the current sample of cases by postulating implicit elements for future study. The implication of the radex model of stalking for the management of and interventions in stalking are also considered as the basis for future explorations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Borg, I. & Lingoes, J. (1987). Multidimensional Similarity Analysis, New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Borg, I. & Shye, S. (1995). Facet Theory: Form and Content, London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canter, D. (1994). Criminal Shadows, London: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canter. D. (1995). The Psychology of Offender Profiling, in R. Bull & D. Carsons (Eds.), Handbook of Psychology in Legal Contexts, Chichester: Wiley pp.343-335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canter. D. (2004). Offender Profiling and Investigative Psychology. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 1, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canter, D., Bennell, C., Alison, L.J., & Reddy, S. (2003). Differentiating Sex Offenders: A Be-haviorally Bases Thematic Classification of Stranger Rapes. Behavioral Sciences and Law, 21(2), 157–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canter, D., & Heritage, R. (1990). A Multivariate Model of Sexual Behaviour: Developments in ‘Offender Profiling’ I. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry, 1, 185–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, P.E. et al. (1991). Threatening and Otherwise Inappropriate Letters to Hollywood Celebrities. Journal of Forensic Science, 36, 185–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, R.M., Ferris, K.O., & Gardner, C.B. (1998). On Being Skilled. Social Problems, 45(3), 289–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geberth, V.J. (1992). Stalkers. Law and Order, October, 138–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harmon, R.B., Rosner, R., & Owens, H. (1995). Obsessional Harassment and Erotomania in a Criminal Court Population. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 40(2), 188–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendricks, J.E. & Spillane, L. (1993). Stalking: what can we do to forestall tragedy. The Police Chief, December, 68–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, R.M. (1993). Stalking in America: Types and Methods of Criminal Stalkers. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 9 (4), 317–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamphuis, J.H. & Emmelkamp, P.M.G. (2000). Stalking—a contemporary challenge for forensic and clinical psychiatry. British Journal of Psychiatry, 176, 206–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lingoes, J. (1973). The Guttman-Lingoes Non-Metric Program Series, MA Thesis, University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowney, K.S. & Best, J. (1995). Stalking Strangers and Lovers: Changing Media Typifications of a New Crime Problem. In: Best, J (ed.), Images of Issues: Typifying Contemporary Social Problems, New York: Aldine De Gryter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meloy, R.J. (1996). Stalking (Obsessional Following): a review of some preliminary studies. Aggression and Violent Behaviour, 1(2), 147–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullen, P.E., Pathe, M., Purcell, R., & Stuart, G.W. (1999). Study of Stalkers. American Journal of Psychiatry, 156, 1244–1249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perez, C. (1993). S talking: when does obsession become a crime? American Journal of Criminal Law, 20, 263–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, J.A., Burgess, A.G., Burgess, A.W., Laszlo, A.T., McCrary, G.O., & Douglas, J.E. (1996). A Typology of Interpersonal Stalking. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 11(4), 487–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zona, M.E., Sharma, K.K., & Lane, J. (1993). A Comparative Study of Erotomanic and Obsessional Subjects in a Forensic Sample. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 38(4), 894–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David V. Canter.

Additional information

We are grateful to Deborah Elliot for collecting the data on which this study is based. We also wish to thank the Threat Management Unit (TMU) of the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) for providing access to the data.

About this article

Cite this article

Canter, D.V., Ioannou, M. A Multivariate Model of Stalking Behaviours. Behaviormetrika 31, 113–130 (2004). https://doi.org/10.2333/bhmk.31.113

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2333/bhmk.31.113

Key Words and Phrases

Navigation