Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Results of a questionnaire survey for symptom of late complications caused by radiotherapy in breast conserving therapy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The present study aimed to determine the prevalence of subjective symptoms of late complications mainly caused by radiotherapy in breast-conserving therapy (BCT), and to identify patients and treatment factors that may predict such complications.

Materials and Methods

A cross-sectional survey was conducted on 247 patients who had had early breast cancer and who were free of recurrence after BCT. Self-administered questionnaires were mailed to the 247 patients. Patient and treatment factors were analyzed.

Results

Responses were received from 193 of the 247 patients. Common perceptions of late complications included shrinking in size (85%), pain (73%), firmness (65%), thickening of the arm (34%), and changes in skin color (19%). However, high-grade toxicity (above Grade 2) was perceived in only 0.52–7.8% of patients. In multivariate models, shrinking in size was associated with age (P=0.020), pain was associated with additional boost irradiation (P=0.015), and firmness was associated with time after surgery (P-0.004).

Conclusions

Late complications as perceived by the patient herself after BCT are common, but tend to be of minimal severity. Most predictive factors are inevitably associated with late complications. However, the boost irradiation may not be indicated for every patient from a QOL perspective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fujishiro S, Mitsumori M, Kokubo M et al: Cosmetic results and complications after breast conserving therapy for early breast cancer. Breast Cancer 7:57–63, 2000.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wazer DE, DiPetrillo T, Schmi dt-Ullrich R et al: Factors influencing cosmetic outcome and complication risk after conservative surgery and radiotherapy for early-stage breast carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 10:356–363, 1992.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Early breast cancer trialists’ collaborative group: Effects of radiotherapy and surgery in early breast cancer. N Engl J Med 333:1444–1455, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fisher B, Anderson S, Redmond CK et al: Reanalysis and results after 12 years of follow-up in a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy with lumpectomy with or without irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 333:1456–1461, 1995.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Stanton AL, Krishnan L, Collins CA: Form or function? Part 1. Subjective cosmetic and functional correlates of quality of life in women treated with breast-conserving surgical procedures and radiotherapy. Cancer 91:2273–2281, 2001.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Krishnan L, Stanton AL, Collins CA et al: Form or function? Part 2. Objective cosmetic and functional correlates of quality of life in women treated with breast-conserving surgical procedures and radiotherapy. Cancer 91:2282–2287, 2001.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Pavy JJ, Denekamp J, Letschert J et al: EORTC Late Effects Working Group. Late Effects toxicity scoring: the SOMA scale. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 31:1043–1047. 1995

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fehlauer F, Tribius S, Holler U et al: Long-term radiation sequelae after breast-conserving therapy in women with early-stage breast cancer: an observational study using the LENT-SOMA scoring system. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 55:651–658, 2003.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hoeller U, Tribius S, Kuhlmey A et al: Increasing the rate of late toxicity by changing the score? A comparison of RTOG/EORTC and LENT/SOMA scores. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 55:1013–1018, 2003.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Whelan TJ, Levine M, Julian J et al: The effects of radiation therapy on quality of life of women with breast carcinoma. Cancer 88:2260–2266, 2000.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bartelink H, Horiot JC, Poortmans P et al: Recurrence rates after treatment of breast cancer with standard radiotherapy with or without additional radiation. N Engl J Med 345:1378–1387, 2001.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Borger JH, Kemperman H, Smitt HS et al: Dose and volume effects on fibrosis after breast conservation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 30:1073–1081, 1994.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Johansson S, Svensson H, Denekamp J: Dose response and latency for radiation-induced fibrosis, edema, and neuropathy in breast cancer patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 52:1207–1219, 2002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pierquin B, Mazeron JJ, Glaubiger D: Conservative treatment of breast cancer in Europe: report of the Groupe Europeen de Curietherapie. Radiother Oncol 6:187–198, 1986.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Johansen J, Overgaard J, Blichert-Toft M et al: Treatment of morbidity associated with the management of the axilla in breast-conserving therapy. Acta Oncol 39:349–354, 2000.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Markiewicz DA, Schultz DJ, Haas JA et al: The effects of sequence and type of chemotherapy and radiation therapy on cosmesis and complications after breast conservation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 35:661–668, 1996.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiromichi Ishiyama.

About this article

Cite this article

Ishiyama, H., Niino, K., Hosoya, T. et al. Results of a questionnaire survey for symptom of late complications caused by radiotherapy in breast conserving therapy. Breast Cancer 13, 197–201 (2006). https://doi.org/10.2325/jbcs.13.197

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2325/jbcs.13.197

Keywords

Navigation