Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison of numerical and biosystematic studies in Haplopappus

  • Published:
Brittonia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Numerical phenetics, based on indiscriminate choice of characters and equal weighting, does not directly reflect cladistic or lineage relationships in some taxa ofHaplopappus. However, the degree to which the lineage and phenetic relationships diverge may be used as an assay of the amount of parallel evolution that has occurred. Several numerical taxonomic methods were employed. For each method a change in the number of characters from 31 to 29, by deletion of two karyotypic characters, yielded a significant change in the results. Uses of numerical techniques for the study of character dines and adaptive character complexes are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Camin, J. H. &R. R. Sokal 1965. A method for deducing branching sequences in phylogeny. Evolution19: 311–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crovello, T. J. 1968a. A numerical taxonomic study of the genusSalix, sectionSitchenses. Univ. California Publ. Bot.44: 1–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crovello, T. J. 1968b. Key communality cluster analysis as a taxonomic tool. Taxon17: 241–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eades, D. C. 1965. The inappropriateness of the correlation coefficient as a measure of taxonomic resemblance. Syst. Zool.14: 98–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Gazzar, A., L. Watson, W. T. Williams, &G. N. Lance 1968. The taxonomy ofSalvia: a test of two radically different numerical methods. Jour. Linn. Soc. London (Bot.)60: 237–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gower, J. C. 1966. Some distance properties of latent root and vector methods used in multivariate analysis. Biometrika53: 325–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiser, C. B., Jr.,J. Soria, &D. L. Burton 1965. A numerical taxonomic study ofSolatium species and hybrids. Amer. Nat.99: 471–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, R. C. 1962. Interspecific hybridization inHaplopappus and its bearing on chromo some evolution in theBlepharodon section. Amer. Jour. Bot.49: 119–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, R. C. 1965. A cytogenetic study of a three-paired race ofHaplopappus gracilis. Amer. Jour. Bot.52: 946–953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, M. W. &A. M. Torres 1965. Numerical analyses of cespitose Zinnias. Brittonia17: 335–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michener, C. D. &R. R. Sokal 1957. A quantitative approach to a problem in classification. Evolution11: 130–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramon, S. 1968. A numerical taxonomic study of certain taxa ofHaplopappus sectionBlepharodon. Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull.47: 863–900.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R. R. &P. H. A. Sneath 1963. Principles of Numerical Taxonomy. San Fransico & London: W. H. Freeman & Co. xvi + 359 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O. 1969. Summary of the conference. pp. 615–627. In: Systematic Biology. Proceedings of an International Conference. Conducted at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, June 14–16, 1967. Sponsored by the National Research Council. Publication 1692, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D. C. xiii + 632 pp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This study was aided in part by NSF grants GB-14827, -7751, and -3071 to R. C. Jackson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jackson, R.C., Crovello, T.J. A comparison of numerical and biosystematic studies in Haplopappus. Brittonia 23, 54–70 (1971). https://doi.org/10.2307/2805842

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2805842

Keywords

Navigation