Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T18:07:14.525Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Femicide and the Palestinian Criminal Justice System: Seeds of Change in the Context of State Building?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

Nadera Shalhoub-Kevorkian
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Despite the criminalization of abuses inflicted upon women, laws are still considered major sources of women's oppression. This article discusses how Palestinian society and its criminal justice system, during a politically formative period of state building, relates to “femicide.” Femicide in this study pertains to the murder of girls or women for allegedly committing “crimes of family honor.” Official statistics, Cassation Court rulings, and six documented cases were analyzed in depth to determine the role played by the penal code, the legal system, and the external sociocultural context in exonerating the perpetrator of femicide and placing the victim on trial. The data reflect a silent masculine conspiracy that empowers sexist and gender-biased legal policies. The article concludes by challenging Palestinian legislators to fight legal discrimination against women. It argues that state-building periods can be a “window of hope,” offering societies such as Palestine's the unique opportunity to reexamine and reconstruct their laws from a gender-sensitive position.

Type
Papers of General Interest
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 36 , Issue 3 , 2002 , pp. 577 - 605
Copyright
Copyright © 2002 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I would like to thank the staff and administration at the Women's Center for Legal Aid and Counseling, particularly the femicide research team: Ahamad Baker, Mahmood Ziadeh, Shireen Shihabi, Musa Najib, and Suad Abu Dayyeh, for their insightful additions to the manuscript and for their help in conducting the study. I am also grateful for the editorial assistance of Helene Hogri.

References

Abdo, Nahla (1999) “Gender and Politics under the Palestinian Authority,” 28 J. of Palestine Studies 38–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abu-Lughod, Laila (1991) “Writing Against Culture,” in Fox, Richard G., ed., Recapturing Anthropology: Working in the Present. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
Abu-Odeh, Lama (2000) “Crimes of Honor and the Construction of Gender in Arab Society,” in Ilkkaracan, Pinar, ed., Women and Sexuality in Muslim Society. Istanbul: Women for Women's Human Rights (WWHR), New Ways.Google Scholar
Acker, Joan, Barry, Kate, & Esseveld, Jake (1983) “Objectivity and Truth: Problems in Doing Feminist Research,” 6 Women's Studies International Forum 423–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Afshar, Haleh, ed. (1993) Women in the Middle East: Perceptions, Realities, and Struggles for Liberation. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barakat, Halim (1985) “The Arab Family and the Challenge of Social Transformation,” in Fernea, E. W., ed., Women and the Family in the Middle East: New Voices of Change. Austin, TX: Univ. of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Browning, Christopher Robert (1991) Ordinary Men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the Final Solution in Poland. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Brownmiller, Suzan (1975) Against Our Will: Men, Women, and Rape. London: Secker & Warburg.Google Scholar
Bruner, Edward M. (1993) Introduction. “The Ethnographic Self and the Personal Self,” in Benson, P., ed., Anthropology and Literature. Urbana: Univ. of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
CEDAW (Convention for the Elimination of All Kinds of Discrimination Against Women) (2001) Gap Analyses Report on the Status of Palestinian Women with Reference to CEDAW. Jerusalem/Palestine: Women's Center for Legal Aid and Counseling (WCLAC).Google Scholar
Crenshaw, Kimberle (1991) “Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence Against Women of Color,” 43 Stanford Law Rev. 1241.Google Scholar
Dajjani, Muhammad (1998) “The Palestinian Authority and Citizenship in the Palestinian Territories.” Web site at http://www.pna.org/.Google Scholar
Dara'awi, Dahoud, & Zhaika, Maher (2000) Mahkamat Amn al-Dawla: Bayn al-Darura Wa'l-Mashrueiyah (The state security court: Between necessity and legality). Ramallah: al Damir.Google Scholar
Dower, John (1986) War Without Mercy: Race and Power in the Pacific War. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Dwairy, Marwan (1998) Cross-Cultural Counseling: The Arab-Palestinian Case. New York: Haworth Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, Susan (1981) Female Sexuality and the Law. Oxford: Martin Robertson.Google Scholar
Engel, David (1999) “Making Connections: Law and Society Researchers and Their Subjects,” 33 Law & Society Rev. 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatu, Hisham, & Nashashibi, Shukri (1987) Mabade'e Mahkamat al-Tamiiz al-Urduniah (The principles of the Jordanian Cassation Court). Amman: Jordanian Bar Association.Google Scholar
al-Haq (1989) Punishing a Nation. Ramallah, West Bank: al-Haq (Law in the Service of Man).Google Scholar
Jacobson, Neil, & Gottman, John (1998) When Men Batter Women: New Insights into Ending Abusive Relationships. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Khader, Asma (1998) Al-Qanoun Wa Mustaqbal al-Mar'a al-Filistinyyeh (Law and the future of the Palestinian woman). Jerusalem: Women's Center for Legal Aid and Counseling (WCLAC).Google Scholar
al-Khayyat, Sana'a (1990) Honour and Shame: Women in Modern Iraq. London: Saqi Books.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine (1982) “Feminism, Marxism, Method, and the State: An Agenda for Theory,” 7 Signs 515–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine (1983) “Feminism, Marxism, Method, and the State: Towards Feminist Jurisprudence,” 8 Signs 535–668.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine (1987) Feminism Unmodified: Discourse on Life and Law. Boston: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Mahoney, Martha (1991) “Legal Images of Battered Women: Redefining the Issue of Separation,” 90 Michigan Law Rev. 1.Google Scholar
Mernissi, Fatima (1982) “Virginity and Patriarchy,” 5 Women's Studies International Forum 183–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merry, Sally E. (1995) “Gender Violence and Legally Engendered Selves,” 2 Identities 49–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messerschmidt, James (1993) Masculinities and Crime. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Moghaizel, Fadi, & al-Satar, Marian Abd (1999) Crimes of Honor: Legal Study (Arabic). Beirut: Joseph & Laure Moghaizel Institution.Google Scholar
Moghaizel, Laure (1985) Al-Mar'a ft al-Tashri' al-Lubnani (Women in the Lebanese legislation). Beirut: Muassaset Nawfal.Google Scholar
Moghaizel, Laure (1986) “The Arab and Mediterranean World: Legislation Towards Crimes of Honor,” in Schuler, M., ed., Empowerment and the Law: Strategies of Third World Women. Washington, DC: OEF International.Google Scholar
Otnow Lewis, Dorothy (1998) Guilty by Reason of Insanity: A Psychiatrist Explores the Minds of Killers. New York: Fawcett Columbine.Google Scholar
al-Rais, Naser (2000) Al Qada'a Fi Falastin Wama'uqat Tataworeh (The justice system in Palestine and obstacles to its development). Ramallah, West Bank: al-Haq.Google Scholar
Ruggi, Suzanne (1999) “Honor Killing in Palestine: Commodifying Honor in Female Sexuality,” Middle East Report, Spring.Google Scholar
al-Saadawi, Nawal (1990) Dirasat A'an al-Mara'a Wa-Alrajul Fi al-Mujtama'a al-Arabi (Studies on men and women). Beirut: al-Mua'sasa al-Arabiya Lil Dirasat Wa al-Nashr.Google Scholar
Moghaizel, Laure (1993) “Women's Resistance in the Arab World and in Egypt,” in Haleh, Afshar, ed., Women in the Middle East: Perceptions, Realities, and Struggles for Liberation. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
al-Samman, Ghada (1976) “The Sexual Revolution and the Total Revolution,” in Fernea, E. & Bezirgan, B., eds., Middle Eastern Muslim Women Speak. Austin, TX: Univ. of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Sayigh, Rosemary (1992) “Palestinian Women: A Case of Neglect,” in Najjar, Orayb Aref & Warnock, Kitty, eds., Portraits of Palestinian Women. Salt Lake City: Univ. of Utah Press.Google Scholar
Shalhoub-Kevorkian, Nadera (1999a) “The Politics of Disclosing Female Sexual Abuse: A Case Study of Palestinian Society,” 23 Child Abuse & Neglect 1275–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shalhoub-Kevorkian, Nadera (1999b) “Towards a Cultural Definition of Rape: Dilemmas in Dealing with Rape Victims in Palestinian Society,” 22 Women Studies International Forum 157–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shalhoub-Kevorkian, Nadera (1999c) “Law, Politics, and Violence Against Women: A Case Study of Palestinians in Israel,” 21 Law & Policy 189–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shalhoub-Kevorkian, Nadera (2000a) “Mapping and Analyzing the Landscape of Femicide in Palestine.” A research report submitted by the Women's Center for Legal Aid and Counseling, Jerusalem, to UNIFEM, January.Google Scholar
Shalhoub-Kevorkian, Nadera (2000b) “The Efficacy of Israeli Law in Preventing Violence Within Palestinian Families Living in Israel,” 7 International Rev. of Victimology 47–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smart, Carol (1995) Law, Crime and Sexuality: Essays in Feminism. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Stanko, Elizabeth (1985) Intimate Intrusions: Women's Experience of Male Violence. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Taraki, Lisa (1997) “Contemporary Realities and Trends,” 12 Birzeit Univ. Women 's Studies Program Report.Google Scholar
Timimi, S. Basel (1995) “Adolescence in Immigrant Arab Families,” 32 Psychotherapy 141–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warnock, Kitty (1990) Land Before Honour. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welchman, Lynn (1999) “Extracted Provisions from the Penal Codes of Arab States Relevant to 'Crimes of Honor,'” Roundtable on Strategies to Address Honour Crimes. London: (CIMEL).Google Scholar
Wing, Adrien Katherine (1994) “Customs, Religion, and Rights: The Future Legal Status of Palestinian Women,” 35 Harvard International Law J. 149–200.Google Scholar