Abstract
The morphologically identical species of treefrogs,Hyla chryoscelis andH. versicolor, differ in the pulse-rate of the mating call, as established by previous workers, but there is much more overlap in the ranges of variation of the two species than has been realized. Individuals of both species may utter calls at from about 25 to 35 pulses per second, so within this range the influence of tempeerature must be considered in arriving at a specific determination.Hyla chrysoscleis is recorded for the first time from Delaware (sympatric withH. versicolor) and New Jersey. The northern range limit of this species on the Atlantic Coast is at approximately 390 North latitude, so far as presently known.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature Cited
BLAIR, W. F. 1958. Mating call in the speciation of anuran amphibians.Amer. Nat. 92(862): 27–51.
HOFFMAN, R. L. 1946. The voice ofHyla versicolor in Virginia.Herpetologica 3(4): 141–142.
—, and H. I. KLEINPETER. 1948. Amphibians from Burkes Garden, Virginia.Amer. Midl. Nat. 39(3): 602–607.
JOHNSON, C. 1959. Genetic incompatibility in the call races ofHyla versicolor Le Conte in Texas.Copeia 1959(4): 327–335.
— 1963. Additional evidence of sterility between call-types in theHyla versicolor complex.Copia 1963(1): 139–143.
— 1966. Species recognition in theHyla versicolor complex.Tex. J. Sci. 18(4): 361–364.
LITTLEJOHN, M. J., M. J. FOUQUETTE, JR., and C. JOHNSON. 1960. Call discrimination by female frogs of theHyla versicolor complex.Copeia 1960(1): 47–49.
NOBLE, G. K., and W. G. HASSLER. 1936. Three Salientia of geographic interest from southern Maryland.Copeia 1936(1):63–64.
RALIN, D. B. 1968. Ecological and reproductive differentiation in the cryptic species of theHyla versicolor complex (Hylidae).Southwest. Nat. 13(3): 283–299.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zweifel, R.G. Distribution and mating call of the treefrog,Hyla chrysoscelis, at the northeastern edge of its range. Chesapeake Science 11, 94–97 (1970). https://doi.org/10.2307/1350483
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1350483