Skip to main content
Log in

Interactive effects of nutrient additions and predation on infaunal communities

  • Published:
Estuaries Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nutrient additions represent an important anthropogenic stress on coastal ecosystems. At moderate levels, increased nutrients may lead to increased primary production and, possibly, to increased biomass of consumers although complex trophic interactions may modify or mask these effects. We examined the influence of nutrient additions and interactive effects of trophic interactions (predation) on benthic infaunal composition and abundances through small-scale field experiments in 2 estuaries that differed in ambient nutrient conditions. A blocked experimental design was used that allowed an assessment of direct nutrient effects in the presence and absence of predation by epibenthic predators as well as an assessment of the independent effects of predation. Benthic microalgal, production increased with experimental nutrient additions and was greater when infaunal abundances were lower, but there were no significant interactions between these factors. Increased abundances of one infaunal taxa,Laeonereis culveri, as well as the grazer feeding guild were observed with nutrient additions and a number of taxa exhibited higher abundances with predator exclusion. In contrast to results from freshwater systems there were no significant interactive effects between nutrient additions and predator exclusion as was predicted. The infaunal responses observed here emphasize the importance of both bottom-up (nutrient addition and primary producer driven) and top-down (predation) controls in structuring benthic communities. These processes may work at different spatial and temporal scales, and affect different taxa, making observation of potential interactive effects difficult.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Admiraal, W. 1977. Influence of light and temperature on the growth rate of estuarine benthic diatoms in culture.Marine Biology 19:1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, M. E. 1996. The effect of nutrient loading on benthic microalgal biomass and taxonomic composition. M.S. Thesis, University of North Carolina at Wilmington, Wilmington, North Carolina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloesch, J. andH. Burgi. 1989. Changes in phytoplankton and zooplankton biomass and composition reflected by sedimentation.Limnology and Oceanography 34:1048–1061.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cahoon, L. B. andJ. E. Cooke. 1992. Benthic microalgal biomass in sediments of Onslow Bay, North Carolina, USA.Marine Ecology Progress Series 84:185–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, H. andE. Kanneworff. 1985. Sedimenting phytoplankton as major food source for suspension and deposit feeders in the Oresund.Ophelia 24:223–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colijn, F. 1982. Light absorption in the waters of the Ems-Dollard estuary and its consequences for the growth of phytoplankton and microphytobenthos.Netherlands Journal of Sea Research 15:196–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dauer, M. W., R. W. Ewing, G. H. Tourtellotte, W. T. Harlan, J. W. Sourbeer, andH. R. Baker. 1982. Predation, resource limitation and the structure of lower Chesapeake Bay. Benthic studies of lower Chesapeake Bay I.Internationale Revue der Gesamten Hydrobiologie 17:477–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fauchald, K. andP. A. Jumars. 1979. The diet of worms: A study of polychaete feeding guilds.Oceanography and Marine Biology Annual Reviews 17:193–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, D. B. 1989. The distribution and trophic significance of benthic microalgae in Masonboro Sound, North Carolina. M.S. Thesis, University of North Carolina at Wilmington, Wilmington, North Carolina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granelli E. andK. Sundback. 1985. The response of planktonic and microbenthic algal assemblages to nutrient enrichment in shallow coastal waters, southwest Sweden.Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 85:253–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howarth, R. W.. 1988. Nutrient limitation of net primary production in marine ecosystems.Annual Review of Ecology 19:89–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, M. D. andP. W. Price. 1992. Playing chutes and ladders: Heterogeneity and the relative roles of bottom-up and top-down forces in natural communities.Ecology 73:724–732.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keizer, P. D., B. T. Hargrave, andD. C. Gordon, Jr 1989. Sediment-water exchange of dissolved nutrients at an intertidal site in the upper reaches of the Bay of Fundy.Estuaries 12: 1–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Levinton, J. S. 1982. Marine Biology. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinton, J. S. andT. S. Bianchi. 1981. Nutrient and food limitation of deposit feeders. I. The role of microbes in the growth of mud snails (Hydrobiidae).Journal of Marine Research 39:531–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallin, M. A. 1994. Phytoplankton ecology of North Carolina estuaries.Estuaries 17:561–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallin, M. A., L. B. Cahoon, J. J. Manock, J. F. Merritt, M. H. Posey, T. D. Alphin, andR. K. Sizemore. 1995. Water quality in New Hanover County tidal creeks, 1994–1995. Report to New Hanover County and the Northeast New Hanover Conservancy. University of North Carolina at Wilmington Press, Wilmington, North Carolina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallin, M. A., L. B. Cahoon, J. J. Manock, J. F. Merritt, M. H. Posey, R. K. Sizemore, T. D. Alphin, K. E. Williams, andE. D. Hubertz. 1996. Water quality in New Hanover County tidal creeks, 1995–1996. Report to New Hanover County and the Northeast New Hanover Conservancy. University of North Carolina at Wilmington Press, Wilmington, North Carolina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallin, M. A., L. B. Oahoon, M. P. McIver, D. L. Parsons, andG. C. Shank. 1997. Nutrient limitation and eutrophication potential in the Cape Fear and New River estuaries. Final Report. Water Resources Institute of the University of North Carolina, Raleigh, North Carolina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazurkiewicz, M. 1975. Larval development and habits ofLaeonereis culveri (Webster) (Polychaeta: Nereidae).Biological Bulletin 149:186–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McQueen, D. J., M. R. S. Johannes, J. R. Post, T. J. Stewart, andD. R. S. Lean. 1989. Bottom-up and top-down impacts on freshwater pelagic community structure.Ecological Monographs 59:289–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nearhoof, J. E. 1994. Effects of water depth and clarity on the distribution and relative abundance of phytoplankton and benthic microalgae in North Carolina estuaries. M.S., Thesis, University of North Carolina at Wilmington, Wilmington, North Carolina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearl, H. W., M. A., Mallin, C. A. Donahue, M. Go, andB. J. Peierls. 1995. Nitrogen loading sources and eutrophication on the Neuse River Estuary, North Carolina: Direct and indirect roles of atmospheric deposition. Report No. 291, Water Resources Research Institute of the University of North Carolina, Raleigh, North Carolina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennock, J. R. andJ. H. Sharp. 1994. Temporal alternation between light-and nutrient-limitation of phytoplankton production in a coastal plain estuary.Marine Ecology Progress Series 111:275–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C. H. 1979. Predation, competition, exclusion and diversity in the soft-sediment benthic communities of estuaries and lagoons, p. 233–264.In R. J. Livingston (ed.), Ecological Processes in Coastal and Marine Systems. Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettibone, M. H. 1971. Revision of some species referred toLeptonereis, Nicon, andLaeonereis (Polychaeta: Nereidae). Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology, No. 104, Smithsonian Press, Washington, D. C..

    Google Scholar 

  • Posey, M. H.. 1987. Influence of relative mobilities on the composition of benthic communities.Marine Ecology Progress Series 39:99–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posey, M. H. 1990. Functional approaches to soft-substrate communities: How useful are they?Reviews in Aquatic Science 2/3: 343–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posey, M. H., T. D. Alphin, S. Banner, F. Vose, andW. Lindberg. 1998. Temporal variability, diversity and guild structure of a benthic community in the northeastern Gulf of Mexico.Bulletin of Marine Science 63:143–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posey, H., C. Powell, L. Cahoon, andD. Lindquist. 1995. Top down vs. bottom up control of benthic community composition on an intertidal tide flat.Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 185:19–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Power, M. E. 1990. Effects of fish in river food webs.Science 250: 811–814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Power, M. E. 1992. Top-down and bottom-up forces in food webs: Do plants have primacy?Ecology 73:733–746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhoads, D. C. andD. K. Young. 1970. The influence of deposit feeding organisms on sediment stability and community structure.Journal of Marine Research 28:150–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roughgarden, J. 1986. A comparison of food-limited and space-limited animal competition communities, p. 492–516.In J. Diamond and T. J. Case (eds.), Community Ecology. Harper & Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R. R. andF. J. Rohlf. 1981. Biometry. 2nd edition. W. H. Freeman & Co., San Francisco, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stager, J. C. andL. B. Cahoon. 1992. The distribution of microalgae in littoral habitats in Lake Waccamaw, North Carolina.Journal of the Elisha Mitchell Scientific Society 108:117–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsutsumi, H. 1990. Population persistence ofCapitella sp. (Polychaeta; Capitellidae) on a mud flat subject to environmental disturbance by organic enrichment.Marine Ecology Progress Series 63:147–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsutsumi, H., S. Fukunaga, N. Fujita, andM. Sumida. 1990. Relationship between growth ofCapitella sp. and organic enrichment of the sediment.Marine Ecology Progress Series 63:157–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varela, M. andE. Penas. 1985. Primary production of benthic microalgae in an intertidal sand flat of the Ria de Arosa, NW Spain.Marine Ecology Progress Series 25:111–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Virnstein, R. W. 1978. Predator caging experiments in soft sediment: Caution advised, p. 261–273In M. L. Wiley (ed.), Estuarine Interactions, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitney, D. E. andW. M. Darley. 1979. A method for the determination of chlorophylla samples containing degradation products.Limnology and Oceanography 24:183–187.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Jr.,W. H. 1991. Competition and predation in marine soft-sediment communities.Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 21:221–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiltse, W. I., K. H. Foreman, J. M. Teal, andI. Valiela. 1984. Effects of predators and food resources on the macrobenthos of salt marshes creek.Journal of Marine Research 42:923–942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfrath, B. 1992. Field experiments on feeding of European fiddler crabUca tangeri.Marine Ecology Progress Series 90:39–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodin, S. A.. 1976. Adult-larval interactions in dense infaunal assemblages: Patterns of abundance.Journal of Marine Research 34:25–41.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Posey, M.H., Alphin, T.D., Cahoon, L. et al. Interactive effects of nutrient additions and predation on infaunal communities. Estuaries 22, 785–792 (1999). https://doi.org/10.2307/1353111

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1353111

Keywords

Navigation