نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

گروه تربیت بدنی، واحد شیراز، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، شیراز، ایران

چکیده

هدف این پژوهش کیفی، تدوین الگوی طراحی برنامه درسی برای واحد درسی کارورزی رشته آموزش تربیت بدنی در دانشگاه فرهنگیان بود. در طراحی مطالعه، از راهبرد تثلیث و شاخص‌های اعتبارپذیری، اعتمادپذیری، تأییدپذیری و انتقال‌پذیری به منظور افزایش اطمینان‌پذیری یافته‌های پژوهش استفاده شد. اطلاعات از طریق مصاحبه‌های نیمه‌ساختارمند با ذینفعان دوره‌های کارورزی (13 استاد راهنما، 17 معلّم راهنما، 21 دانشجو معلّم) و تحلیل محتوای اسناد بالادستی و تحولی گردآوری شد. شرکت‌کنندگان با استفاده از نمونه‌گیری هدفمند انتخاب شدند و مصاحبه‌ها تا رسیدن به اشباع نظری ادامه داشت. مصاحبه‌های ضبط شده پس از تبدیل به نوشتار با استفاده از تحلیل محتوای کیفی با رویکرد قیاسی براساس مضامین مدل مبناء (اهداف، محتوا، فعالیت‌های یادگیری و روش‌های ارزشیابی) تحلیل شدند. کدگذاری باز و مقوله‌بندی میانی در فرایند تحلیل محتوا، به استخراج 59 مفهوم اولیه و 11 مضمون میانی منتهی شد که این مضامین در قالب چهار عنصر اهداف (دانشی، نگرشی و رفتاری)، محتوا (پیش‌نیازها، محتوای مبتنی بر دانشگاه و مدرسه)، فعالیت‌های یادگیری (دانشگاه‌محور و مدرسه‌محور) و روش‌های ارزشیابی (زمان، روش و مرجع ارزشیابی) طبقه‌بندی و تشریح شدند. علاوه براین، عوامل اثرگذار بر اثربخشی دوره‌های کارورزی براساس یک پرسش فرعی مورد شناسایی و بحث قرار گرفت (30 مفهوم اولیه در قالب 7 مضمون میانی و 3 مضمون نهایی). یافته‌های پژوهش حاضر بر لزوم کاهش شکاف بین تئوری و عمل، توجه به نیازهای عملی تدریس در کلاس‌های تربیت بدنی و همکاری نزدیک بین مدرسه و دانشگاه در طراحی برنامه درسی کارورزی تأکید دارد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

  1. Aghaei, N., Saffari, M., & Hoseini, F. S. (2017). Recognition of professional competence of physical education teachers with grounded theory approach. Research in Sport Management and Motor Behavior, 14, 71-83. (Persian).
  2. Almeida, V. A. R. D., Correa, C. G., & Brum, F. (2020). Supervised physical education curricular internship: The importance of the school's supervisor teacher for training undergraduate. IOSR Journal of Sports and Physical Education, 7(6), 38-43.
  3. Amaral-da-Cunha, M., Graça, A., Batista, P., & MacPhail, A. (2020). Giving birth to a supervisory identity built upon pedagogical perspectives on teaching: The case of a novice physical education cooperating teacher. European Physical Education Review, 26(2), 353-374.
  4. Becker, E. S., Waldis, M., & Staub, F. C. (2019). Advancing student teachers’ learning in the teaching practicum through content-focused coaching: A field experiment. Teaching and Teacher Education, 83, 12-26.
  5. Belton, S., Woods, C., Dunning, C., & Meegan, S. (2010). The evaluation of a cooperating physical education teachers programme (COPET). European Physical Education Review, 16(2), 141–154. 
  6. Borko, H., & Mayfield, V. (1995). The roles of the cooperating teacher and university supervisor in learning to teach. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(5), 501-518.
  7. Campbell, J. L., Quincy, C., Osserman, J., & Pedersen, O. K. (2013). Coding in-depth semi-structured interviews: Problems of unitization and inter-coder reliability and agreement. Sociological Methods & Research, 42(3), 294-320.
  8. Clarke, A., Triggs, V., & Nielsen, W. (2014). Cooperating teacher participation in teacher education: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 84(2), 163-202.
  9. Davis, J. S., & Fantozzi, V. B. (2016). What do student teachers want in mentor teachers? Desired, expected, possible, and emerging roles. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 24(3), 250-266.
  10. Dicke, T., Elling, J., Schmeck, A., & Leutner, D. (2015). Reducing reality shock: The effects of classroom management skills training on beginning teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 48, 1-12.
  11. Dunning, C., Meegan, S., Woods, C., & Belton, S. J. (2011). The impact of the COPET programme on student PE teachers’ teaching practice experiences. European Physical Education Review, 17(2), 153–165.
  12. Fives, H., Hamman, D., & Olivarez, A. (2007). Does burnout begin with student teaching? Analyzing efficacy, burnout, and support during the student teaching semester. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(6), 916-934.
  13. Farahani, A., Nasr-E-Esfahani, A., & Sharif-Khalif-Soltani, M. (2010). A study method of elementary school teachers training in teacher training center. Technology of Education Journal, 4(4), 287-301. (Persian)
  14. Grudnoff, L. (2011). Rethinking the practicum: Limitations and possibilities. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 39(3), 223-234.
  15. Hascher, T., Cocard, Y., & Moser, P. (2004). Forget about theory - practice is all? Student teachers' learning in practicum. Teachers and Teaching, 10(6), 623-637.
  16. Hodges, C. (1982). Implementing methods: If you can't blame the cooperating teacher who can you blame? Journal of Teacher Education, 33(6), 25-29.
  17. Hoffman, J. V., Wetzel, M. M., Maloch, B., Greeter, E., Taylor, L., DeJulio, S., & Vlach, S. K. (2015). What can we learn from studying the coaching interactions between cooperating teachers and pre-service teachers? A literature review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 52, 99-112.
  18. Iaochite, R. T., & Costa Filho, R. A. D. (2016). Teacher efficacy beliefs during the practicum experiences in physical education classes. Motriz: Revista de Educação Física, 22, 183-189.
  19. Iran Ministry of Science, Research and Technology, Council for Development and Planning in Higher Education (2022). Curriculum in instruction of physical education. Retrieved from: https://cfu.ac.ir/fa/attach/610233
  20. Korthagen, F. A. J. (2010). Situated learning theory and the pedagogy of teacher education: Towards an integrative view of teacher behavior and teacher learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(1), 98-106.
  21. Kwan, T., & Lopez-Real, F. (2005). Mentors' perceptions of their roles in mentoring student teachers. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 33(3), 275-287.
  22. Lamb, P., Lane, K., & Aldous, D. (2013). Enhancing the spaces of reflection: A buddy peer-review process within physical education initial teacher education. European Physical Education Review, 19(1), 21–38. 
  23. Lawson, T., Çakmak, M., Gündüz, M., & Busher, H. (2015). Research on teaching practicum: A systematic review. European Journal of Teacher Education, 38(3), 392-407.
  24. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
  25. Martin, S. D., & Dismuke, S. (2018). Investigating differences in teacher practices through a complexity theory lens: the influence of teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 69(1), 22–39.
  26. Martins, M., Costa, J., & Onofre, M. (2015). Practicum experiences as sources of pre-service teachers’ self-efficacy. European Journal of Teacher Education, 38(2), 263-279.
  27. Masoumpanah, Z., Tahririan, M., Afzali, K., & Alibabaee, A. (2016). A critical needs analysis of practicum courses at Farhangian University: Mentors and students’ perspectives. Iranian Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5(2), 60-82. (Persian)
  28. Mehrmohammadi, M. (1989). The models of curriculum design. Quarterly Journal of Education, 16, 10-28. (Persian)
  29. Meegan, S., Dunning, C., Belton, S., & Woods, C. (2013). Teaching practice: University supervisors’ experiences and perceptions of a cooperating physical education teacher education programme. European Physical Education Review, 19(2), 199–214.
  30. Mena, J., Hennissen, P., & Loughran, J. (2017). Developing pre-service teachers' professional knowledge of teaching: The influence of mentoring. Teaching and Teacher Education, 66, 47-59.
  31. Moen, K. M., & Standal, Ø. (2016). Practicum in physical education teacher education: An educational partnership? SAGE Open, 6(1), 1-10.
  32. Moen, K. M., & Standal, Ø. F. (2014). Student teachers’ perceptions of the practicum in physical education teacher education in Norway. Nordic Studies in Education, 34, 111-126.
  33. Mordal-Moen, K. M., Green, K. (2012). Physical education teacher education in Norway: The perceptions of student teachers. Sport, Education & Society, 19, 806-823.
  34. Mortazavizadeh, H., & Nasr-Isfahani, A. R. (2017). Studying the problems concerning the internship course from the Farhangian University students' point of view. Journal of Educational Research, 34, 60-74. (Persian)
  35. Natow, R. S. (2020). The use of triangulation in qualitative studies employing elite interviews. Qualitative Research, 20(2), 160-173.
  36. Richter, D., Kunter, M., Lüdtke, O., Klusmann, U., Anders, Y., & Baumert, J. (2013). How different mentoring approaches affect beginning teachers' development in the first years of practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 36, 166-177.
  37. Ronfeldt, M., & Reininger, M. (2012). More or better student teaching? Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(8), 1091-1106.
  38. Saadvandi, M., & Abbasi, E. (2021). Curriculum Design Patterns. Encyclopedia of Technical Education and Training, (1), 324-329. (Persian)
  39. Sato, T., Haegele, J., Saito, M., & Sawae, Y. (2022). The professional socialization of Japanese graduate students during adapted physical education practicum experiences. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 69(2), 594-608.
  40. Spatz, V., Wilhelm, T., Hopf, M., Waltner, C., & Wiesner, H. (2019). Teachers using a novel curriculum on an introduction to Newtonian mechanics: The effects of a short-term professional development program. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 30(2), 159-178.
  41. Standal, Ø. F., Moen, K. M., & Moe, V. F. (2014). Theory and practice in the context of practicum: The perspectives of Norwegian physical education student teachers. European Physical Education Review, 20(2), 165-178.
  42. Taliaferro, A. R., & Bulger, S. M. (2020). A Delphi study of effective adapted physical education practicum experiences. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 37(1), 20-40.
  43. Tekel, E., Bayır, Ö. Ö., & Dulay, S. (2022). Teaching practicum during the Covid-19 pandemic: A comparison of the practices in different countries. International Journal of Progressive Education, 18(2), 71-86
  44. Tolgfors, B., Backman, E., Nyberg, G., & Quennerstedt, M. (2021). Between ideal teaching and ‘what works’: The transmission and transformation of a content area from university to school placements within physical education teacher education. European Physical Education Review, 27(2), 312–327.
  45. Tsuda, E., Wyant, J., Sato, T., & Haegele, J. A. (2019). Pre-service physical education teachers’ practicum experiences teaching PREK children. International Journal of Kinesiology in Higher Education, 3(4), 128-140.
  46. Velija, P., Capel, S., Katene, W., & Hayes, S. (2008). Does knowing stuff like PSHE and citizenship make me a better teacher? Student teachers in the teacher training figuration. European Physical Education Review, 14(3), 389-406.
  47. Yilmaz, I., & Koca, F. (2017). Investigation the effects of field-based practicum experience on pre-service physical education teachers' self-efficacy beliefs. International Journal of Eurasia Social Sciences, 8(30), 1686-1695.
  48. Zhu, Q., Shen, H., & Chen, A. (2020). Can practicum teaching change pre-service physical education teacher value orientations? Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 40(3), 450-459.