Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Jun 15, 2017
Open Peer Review Period: Jun 15, 2017 - Sep 1, 2017
Date Accepted: Jan 29, 2018
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Vaccine Images on Twitter: Analysis of What Images are Shared

Chen T, Dredze M

Vaccine Images on Twitter: Analysis of What Images are Shared

J Med Internet Res 2018;20(4):e130

DOI: 10.2196/jmir.8221

PMID: 29615386

PMCID: 5904451

Vaccine Images on Twitter: Analysis of What Images are Shared

  • Tao Chen; 
  • Mark Dredze

ABSTRACT

Background:

Visual imagery plays a key role in health communication; however, there is little understanding of what aspects of vaccine-related images make them effective communication aids. Twitter, a popular venue for discussions related to vaccination, provides numerous images that are shared with tweets.

Objective:

The objectives of this study were to understand how images are used in vaccine-related tweets and provide guidance with respect to the characteristics of vaccine-related images that correlate with the higher likelihood of being retweeted.

Methods:

We collected more than one million vaccine image messages from Twitter and characterized various properties of these images using automated image analytics. We fit a logistic regression model to predict whether or not a vaccine image tweet was retweeted, thus identifying characteristics that correlate with a higher likelihood of being shared. For comparison, we built similar models for the sharing of vaccine news on Facebook and for general image tweets.

Results:

Most vaccine-related images are duplicates (125,916/237,478; 53.02%) or taken from other sources, not necessarily created by the author of the tweet. Almost half of the images contain embedded text, and many include images of people and syringes. The visual content is highly correlated with a tweet’s textual topics. Vaccine image tweets are twice as likely to be shared as nonimage tweets. The sentiment of an image and the objects shown in the image were the predictive factors in determining whether an image was retweeted.

Conclusions:

We are the first to study vaccine images on Twitter. Our findings suggest future directions for the study and use of vaccine imagery and may inform communication strategies around vaccination. Furthermore, our study demonstrates an effective study methodology for image analysis.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Chen T, Dredze M

Vaccine Images on Twitter: Analysis of What Images are Shared

J Med Internet Res 2018;20(4):e130

DOI: 10.2196/jmir.8221

PMID: 29615386

PMCID: 5904451

Per the author's request the PDF is not available.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.

Advertisement