Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Medical Education

Date Submitted: Nov 8, 2023
Open Peer Review Period: Nov 8, 2023 - Nov 22, 2023
Date Accepted: Jan 28, 2024
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Development of a Clinical Simulation Video to Evaluate Multiple Domains of Clinical Competence: Cross-Sectional Study

Shikino K, Nishizaki Y, Fukui S, Yokokawa D, Yamamoto Y, Kobayashi H, Shimizu T, Tokuda Y

Development of a Clinical Simulation Video to Evaluate Multiple Domains of Clinical Competence: Cross-Sectional Study

JMIR Med Educ 2024;10:e54401

DOI: 10.2196/54401

PMID: 38421691

PMCID: 10940988

Development of a Clinical Simulation Video to Evaluate Multiple Domains of Clinical Competence: A Cross-sectional Study

  • Kiyoshi Shikino; 
  • Yuji Nishizaki; 
  • Sho Fukui; 
  • Daiki Yokokawa; 
  • Yu Yamamoto; 
  • Hiroyuki Kobayashi; 
  • Taro Shimizu; 
  • Yasuharu Tokuda

ABSTRACT

Background:

Medical students in Japan undergo a two-year postgraduate residency program to acquire clinical knowledge and general medical skills. The General Medicine In-Training Examination (GM-ITE) assesses postgraduate residents’ clinical knowledge.

Objective:

This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between GM ITE scores and residents’ diagnostic skills by having them watch a clinical simulation video (CSV) and to explore residents’ perceptions of the CSV’s realism, educational value, and impact on their motivation to learn.

Methods:

The participants included 56 postgraduate medical residents who took the GM ITE between January 21 and January 28, 2021, watched the CSV, and then provided a diagnosis. We compared the CSV and GM ITE scores and examined the validity of the simulations using discrimination indices wherein ≥0.20 indicated high discriminatory power and >0.40 indicated a very good measure of the subject’s qualifications. Additionally, we administered an anonymous questionnaire to ascertain participants' views on the realism and educational value of the CSV, and its impact on their motivation to learn.

Results:

A total of six participants (10.7%) provided the correct diagnosis, and all were from the second postgraduate year. All domains indicated high discriminatory power. The (anonymous) follow-up responses indicated that the CSV format was more suitable than the conventional GM ITE for assessing clinical competence. The anonymous survey revealed that 52.2% of the participants found the CSV format more suitable than the GM-ITE for assessing clinical competence, 78% affirmed the realism of the video simulation, and 74% indicated that the experience increased their motivation to learn.

Conclusions:

The findings indicated that CSV modules simulating real-world clinical examinations were successful in assessing examinees’ clinical competence across multiple domains. The study demonstrated that the CSV not only augmented the assessment of diagnostic skills but also positively impacted learners’ motivation, suggesting a multifaceted role for simulation in medical education.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Shikino K, Nishizaki Y, Fukui S, Yokokawa D, Yamamoto Y, Kobayashi H, Shimizu T, Tokuda Y

Development of a Clinical Simulation Video to Evaluate Multiple Domains of Clinical Competence: Cross-Sectional Study

JMIR Med Educ 2024;10:e54401

DOI: 10.2196/54401

PMID: 38421691

PMCID: 10940988

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.

Advertisement