Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research
Date Submitted: May 13, 2022
Date Accepted: Jul 20, 2022
Is the Pen Mightier than the App: Cross-sectional Survey of Willingness to use Internet-based vs. Bibliotherapy Interventions in a U.S Representative Sample
ABSTRACT
Background:
Self-help interventions have the potential to increase access to evidence-based mental health care. Self-help can be delivered via different formats, including print media or digital mental health interventions (DMHIs). However, we do not know which delivery format is more likely to result in higher engagement.
Objective:
The aims of this study were to identify if there is a preference for engaging in print media vs. DMHIs and whether there are individual differences in relative preferences.
Methods:
Participants were 423 adults between the ages of 18 and 82 years old (48% female) recruited on Prolific to be a nationally representative sample of the US population (Non-Hispanic White=69%, Non-Hispanic Black=12%, Asian 7.3%, Hispanic=5.9%, Other=5.2%). We provided individuals with psychoeducation on different self-help formats and measured their willingness to use print media vs. DMHIs. We also measured participants’ demographics, personality, and perception of each format’s availability and helpfulness and used these to predict individual differences in the relative preferences.
Results:
Participants reported being more willing to engage with print media than DMHIs (B=.41, SE=.08, t=4.91, P<.001, d=.24, 95% CI=.05–.43). This preference appeared to be influenced by education level (B=.22, SE=.09, t(422)=2.37, P=.02, d=.13, 95% CI=-.06–.32), perceived helpfulness (B=.78, SE=.06, t(12)=13.66, p < .001, d=.46, 95% CI=.27–.66), and perceived availability (B=.20, SE=.58, t(12)=3.25, P=.001, d=.12, 95% CI=.07–.30) of the self-help format.
Conclusions:
This study suggests an overall preference for print media over DMHIs. Future work should study whether receiving mental health treatment via participants’ preferred delivery format can lead to higher engagement.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.