Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Interactive Journal of Medical Research

Date Submitted: Apr 14, 2022
Open Peer Review Period: Apr 14, 2022 - Jun 9, 2022
Date Accepted: Jul 7, 2022
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Examining how Ethics in Relation to Health Technology is Described in the Research Literature: Scoping Review

Steerling E, Houston R, Gietzen LJ, Ogilvie SJ, de Ruiter H, Nygren JM

Examining how Ethics in Relation to Health Technology is Described in the Research Literature: Scoping Review

Interact J Med Res 2022;11(2):e38745

DOI: 10.2196/38745

PMID: 35969434

PMCID: 9425162

Examining how ethics in relation to health technology is described in the research literature: A Scoping Review

  • Emilie Steerling; 
  • Rebecca Houston; 
  • Luke J Gietzen; 
  • Sarah J Ogilvie; 
  • Hans de Ruiter; 
  • Jens M Nygren

ABSTRACT

Background:

Given the increased use of technology in healthcare, both in extent and application, the importance of understanding the ethical implications of new health technologies increases. Profound insight into the possible ethical implications of new health technologies enhances research and development of such technologies and the likelihood of eventual successful implementation in clinical practice.

Objective:

The objective of this study was to gain an understanding of how and if researchers focused on health technologies describing actual or possible ethical aspects of their research findings.

Methods:

An established framework for Scoping reviews was used to guide the methodology. Studies published in PubMed over the last ten years were included if studying or referring to ethics in relation to health technology as defined by established frameworks. In total, 14532 articles were screened, 692 were retained for full-text evaluation, and 227 were included for data extraction.

Results:

Most studies were conducted in North America and Europe; literature review studies were dominant. Most studies had no direct reference to any of the four basic ethical principles: beneficence, non-maleficence, autonomy, and justice. In those cases where studies referenced ethical theory, consequentialism dominated.

Conclusions:

When research about technology is published, the predominant focus is on its intent rather than its actual effect on patients. This lack of insight is problematic considering the vast advancement of technology in which ethics cannot keep up with understanding and offer insights on addressing ethical issues. This finding has implications for practice, research, and education.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Steerling E, Houston R, Gietzen LJ, Ogilvie SJ, de Ruiter H, Nygren JM

Examining how Ethics in Relation to Health Technology is Described in the Research Literature: Scoping Review

Interact J Med Res 2022;11(2):e38745

DOI: 10.2196/38745

PMID: 35969434

PMCID: 9425162

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.

Advertisement