Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Public Health and Surveillance

Date Submitted: Dec 17, 2021
Date Accepted: Nov 25, 2022
Date Submitted to PubMed: Nov 25, 2022

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

An Assessment of the Predictive Performance of Current Machine Learning–Based Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Models: Systematic Review

Gao Y, Li S, Jin Y, Zhou L, Sun S, Xu X, Li S, Yang H, Zhang Q, Wang Y

An Assessment of the Predictive Performance of Current Machine Learning–Based Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Models: Systematic Review

JMIR Public Health Surveill 2022;8(12):e35750

DOI: 10.2196/35750

PMID: 36426919

PMCID: 9837707

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Assessment of performance of the machine learning-based breast cancer risk prediction model: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Ying Gao; 
  • Shu Li; 
  • Yujing Jin; 
  • Lengxiao Zhou; 
  • Shaomei Sun; 
  • Xiaoqian Xu; 
  • Shuqian Li; 
  • Hongxi Yang; 
  • Qing Zhang; 
  • Yaogang Wang

ABSTRACT

Background:

Background:

Machine learning algorithms well-suited in cancer research, especially in breast cancer for the investigation and development of riTo assess the performance of available machine learning-based breast cancer risk prediction model.

Objective:

Objective:

To assess the performance of available machine learning-based breast cancer risk prediction model.

Methods:

Methods:

As of June 9, 2021, articles on breast cancer risk prediction models by machine learning were searched in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science. Studies describing the development or validation of risk prediction models for predicting future breast cancer risk were included. Pooled area under the curve (AUC) were calculated using the DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model.

Results:

Result: A total of 8 studies with 10 datasets were included. Neural network was the most common machine learning method for the development of risk prediction models. The pooled AUC of machine learning-based optimal risk prediction model reported in each study was 0.73 (95%CI: 0.66-0.80), which was higher than that of traditional risk factor-based risk prediction models (all Pheterogeneity < 0.001). The pooled AUC of neural network-based risk prediction model was higher than that of non-neural network-based optimal risk prediction model (0.71 vs. 0.68). Subgroup analysis showed that incorporation of imaging features risk models had a higher pooled AUC than model of non-incorporation of imaging features (0.73 vs. 0.61; Pheterogeneity =0.001).

Conclusions:

Conclusions:

The pooled machine learning-based breast cancer risk prediction model yield a good prediction performance and promising results.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Gao Y, Li S, Jin Y, Zhou L, Sun S, Xu X, Li S, Yang H, Zhang Q, Wang Y

An Assessment of the Predictive Performance of Current Machine Learning–Based Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Models: Systematic Review

JMIR Public Health Surveill 2022;8(12):e35750

DOI: 10.2196/35750

PMID: 36426919

PMCID: 9837707

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.

Advertisement