Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Aging

Date Submitted: Oct 18, 2021
Open Peer Review Period: Oct 18, 2021 - Dec 13, 2021
Date Accepted: Feb 7, 2022
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Barriers to Telemedicine Video Visits for Older Adults in Independent Living Facilities: Mixed Methods Cross-sectional Needs Assessment

Mao A, Tam L, Xu A, Osborn K, Sheffrin M, Gould C, Schillinger E, Martin M, Mesias M

Barriers to Telemedicine Video Visits for Older Adults in Independent Living Facilities: Mixed Methods Cross-sectional Needs Assessment

JMIR Aging 2022;5(2):e34326

DOI: 10.2196/34326

PMID: 35438648

PMCID: 9066341

Barriers to Telemedicine Video Visits for Older Adults in Independent Living Facilities: A Mixed Methods Cross-Sectional Needs Assessment

  • Alice Mao; 
  • Lydia Tam; 
  • Audrey Xu; 
  • Kim Osborn; 
  • Meera Sheffrin; 
  • Christine Gould; 
  • Erika Schillinger; 
  • Marina Martin; 
  • Matthew Mesias

ABSTRACT

Background:

Despite increasing availability of telemedicine video visits during the COVID-19 pandemic, older adults have greater challenges in getting care through telemedicine.

Objective:

We aimed to better understand the barriers to telemedicine in community dwelling older adults in order to improve their access and experience to virtual visits.

Methods:

We conducted a mixed methods needs assessment of older adults at two independent living facilities (Sites A and B) in Northern California between September 2020 and March 2021. Voluntary surveys were distributed. Semi-structured interviews followed for participants who provided contact information. Surveys ascertained participants’ preferred devices as well as comfort level, support, and top barriers regarding telephonic and video visits. Qualitative analysis of transcribed interviews identified key themes.

Results:

Survey respondents’ (N=249) average age was 84.6 (SD = 6.6) and 77% were female. At site A, 89% had a bachelor’s degree or beyond and 99% listed English as their preferred language. At Site B, 43% had a bachelor’s degree or beyond, and 13% preferred English, while 73% preferred Mandarin. Regarding video visits, 37% of all participants felt comfortable connecting with their healthcare team through video visits. Regarding top barriers, participants at Site A reported not knowing how to connect to the platform (24%), not being familiar with the technology (22%), and having difficulty hearing (15%), whereas at Site B, the top barriers were not being able to speak English well (55%), lack of familiarity with technology and the internet (37%), and lack of interest in seeing providers outside of clinic (35%). Three key themes emerged from follow up interviews (n=15): 1) perceived limitations of video visits; 2) the overwhelming process for learning the technology for telemedicine; and 3) desire for in-person or on-demand help with telemedicine.

Conclusions:

Significant barriers exist for older adults in connecting with their healthcare team through telemedicine, particularly video visits. The largest barriers include difficulty with technology or using the video visit platform, language barriers, and lack of desire to see providers virtually. Efforts to improve telemedicine access for older adults should take into account patient perspectives.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Mao A, Tam L, Xu A, Osborn K, Sheffrin M, Gould C, Schillinger E, Martin M, Mesias M

Barriers to Telemedicine Video Visits for Older Adults in Independent Living Facilities: Mixed Methods Cross-sectional Needs Assessment

JMIR Aging 2022;5(2):e34326

DOI: 10.2196/34326

PMID: 35438648

PMCID: 9066341

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.

Advertisement