Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Dermatology

Date Submitted: Oct 18, 2021
Date Accepted: Jan 30, 2022
Date Submitted to PubMed: Aug 26, 2023

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Treatments for Primary Delusional Infestation: Systematic Review

Lu JD, Gotesman RD, Varghese S, Fleming P, Lynde CW

Treatments for Primary Delusional Infestation: Systematic Review

JMIR Dermatol 2022;5(1):e34323

DOI: 10.2196/34323

PMID: 37632851

PMCID: 10334903

Treatments for primary delusional infestation: a systematic review

  • Justin Di Lu; 
  • Ryan D Gotesman; 
  • Shawn Varghese; 
  • Patrick Fleming; 
  • Charles W Lynde

ABSTRACT

Background:

Delusional infestation (DI) is a rare delusional disorder characterized by the fixed belief that one is infested with parasites, worms, insects, and other organisms. Although DI is a psychiatric condition, patients often consult dermatologists with skin findings, and it is currently unclear what treatments are recommended for this disorder.

Objective:

To systematically review and describe the treatments and management of patients presenting with primary DI.

Methods:

A systematic search was conducted using Ovid on MEDLINE, Embase, PsychInfo, and the Cochrane Register of Clinical Trials. Relevant data including treatment, dosage, response, adherence, and side effects were extracted and analyzed.

Results:

A total of 15 case series were included, comprising 280 patients (53.3 mean age, 65.4% female) with DI. Overall, aripiprazole had the highest complete remission (CR) rate of 78.6%. Based on drug classes, selection serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) were the most effective with a 57.1% CR and 42.9% partial remission (PR) rate in patients with comorbid depression, anxiety, or trichotillomania. Furthermore, atypical antipsychotics were more effective than typical antipsychotics (54.4% vs. 47.9% CR rate) with similar PR rates of 35%.

Conclusions:

Atypical antipsychotics appear to be more effective than typical antipsychotics for the treatment of primary DI. Larger studies and randomized controlled trials are needed to evaluate the efficacy of pharmacological therapy for DI.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Lu JD, Gotesman RD, Varghese S, Fleming P, Lynde CW

Treatments for Primary Delusional Infestation: Systematic Review

JMIR Dermatol 2022;5(1):e34323

DOI: 10.2196/34323

PMID: 37632851

PMCID: 10334903

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.

Advertisement